Popular Indiana Democratic U.S. Senator Evan Bayh announced that he was quitting the Senate. Yahoo News gave this account:
"In an interview on MSNBC this morning, newly retiring Sen. Evan Bayh declared the American political system "dysfunctional," riddled with "brain-dead partisanship" and permanent campaigning. Flatly denying any possibility that he'd seek the presidency or any other higher office, Bayh argued that the American people needed to deliver a "shock" to Congress by voting incumbents out in mass and replacing them with people interested in reforming the process and governing for the good of the people, rather than deep-pocketed special-interest groups."In short, Senator Bayh got tired of being a prostitute for the corporate lobbyists who rule the U.S. As Shamus Cooke noted the same day, in the last election, voters gave the Democrats a super majority in the mistaken belief that Democrats would remove U.S. policy from the corporate/neocon grip, only to find that the result was a surge in America's wars of aggression.
There are grounds for hope in the fact that some of the Tea Party people understand that Americans have been betrayed and abandoned by both parties.
Medina makes the valid point that the property tax is a permanent government lien on a person's home. A person never owns his home even after the mortgage is paid off, because he has to continue paying government for the right to live in his home.
Many elderly people have found that a lifetime of inflation and rising real estate assessments have pushed up the tax on their homes so much that it accounts for a large percentage of their retirement incomes. In Alexandria, Virginia, for example, the local government has a program by which the elderly can avoid property tax in exchange for letting the government inherit the property. It is the heirs who are dispossessed.
If Medina is a real representative of the people, she comprises a threat to the oligarchy. The oligarchy will go after her with every known dirty trick. Will Texans stand by her?
Grounds for hope are not easy to come by, but plentiful are the grounds for despair. My recent article, "It Is Official: The U.S. Is Now A Police State," also received confirmation on February 16 with the appearance of Pulitzer prize-wining American journalist Chris Hedges' interview with Russia Today on Information Clearing House.
Asked about the Fahad Hashmi case, Hedges pointed out that Hashmi is a U.S. citizen whose every constitutional right has been violated just as if he were an "enemy combatant," a designation used to justify holding non-Americans in indefinite detention.
Moreover, Hedges reported that Hashmi is not being prosecuted for committing or planning an act of terror. He is being prosecuted "for what he believes," or to be more precise Hashmi is being prosecuted for expressing dissent.
The government's evidence against him is tape recordings of speeches he made at Brooklyn College as a student activist denouncing U.S. policies.These tapes will be played to a patriotic jury likely to convict him for being a Muslim and an anti-American.
The rapidity with which the U.S. is being transformed into a police state is astonishing. It has occurred under the guise of "the war on terror," itself a product of 9/11. Americans were told that the police state regime was only for terrorists, but like RICO's asset freezes, which were only for the Mafia, and the war on drugs' asset forfeitures, which were only for drug lords, the suspension of constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties now extends to all.
Americans regard such warnings as hyperbole. They think they are safe as long as they are not doing anything wrong. In other words, they think that anyone the government picks up must be guilty. This view shows a remarkable ignorance of the 20th century.
Nazi concentration camps and the Soviet Gulag were full of people who had done nothing wrong. Many were people demonized for being of the wrong race and class. Others were people reported by envious neighbors or by someone settling a score. The system didn't care, because it existed independently of any concerns about justice or security.