Thirty Pieces of Silver: Fact or Fantasy?

In the Film Resistance, the character portraying the French mime and Jewish Resistance fighter Marcel Marceau answers a fellow WWII resistance fighter's question about why Jews have been so persistently hated. His answer was stark: "Because for centuries, they were told we killed Jesus."

That accusation of the collective responsibly of all Jews for the suffering and death of Jesus has echoed through nearly two millennia of Western history. Although officially repudiated by many Christian churches, it continues to reverberate beneath the surface and periodically reemerges, often intensifying passions surrounding contemporary events involving Israel.

Central to this deicide charge are the Gospel accounts of Judas-- a Jewish disciple portrayed as betraying Jesus by delivering him to the Jewish authorities, setting in motion the events that culminated in his trial and crucifixion. The Judas story has become one of history's most enduring symbols of betrayal. Yet a careful examination of these narratives raises significant questions about their historical plausibility.

According to the Gospels, the chief priests and other religious authorities were looking for an opportunity to arrest Jesus. They avoided doing so publicly because they feared the reaction of the large crowds (sometimes called multitudes) who admired him: "And the chief priests and scribes sought how they might kill him; for they feared the people"(Luke 22:2).

The story of a clandestine meeting that required an informant bears a striking resemblance to the classical Greek dramatic device known as deus ex machina-- the introduction of an improbable plot element to advance a preferred narrative, rather than one that arises naturally from the preceding events.

The Gospels indicate that the Jewish authorities had ample opportunities to arrest-- or, if they had wished, even kill-- Jesus during or after his many public appearances, as the preceding citation suggests. Against this background, the claim that they needed Judas to identify one of the most recognizable figures in Jerusalem, and then chose to arrest, try, and condemn him during preparations for or at the height of the Passover festival, strains credulity. If the authorities truly regarded Jesus as a threat serious enough to warrant his execution, why wait until the city was crowded with pilgrims celebrating Passover, when any attempt to arrest him publicly could have provoked unrest? The circumstances raise important questions about the historical plausibility of the Gospel account.

Moreover, if the authorities genuinely feared that Jewish crowds might come to Jesus' defense, how did the later claim arise that "the Jews killed Jesus"?

The account of Judas' role also invites suspicion.

According to the Gospel of John, when the arresting party arrived at Gethsemane and asked for Jesus, he stepped forward and declared, "I am he" (John 18:4-8). If Jesus identified himself voluntarily, Judas' kiss appears unnecessary.

Even if one accepts the Synoptic Gospels' account of Judas's identifying kiss, another question immediately arises. Jesus was hardly an obscure fugitive. He had been teaching publicly in Jerusalem, attracting large crowds, debating in the Temple courts, and openly challenging the religious leadership for days. If he truly stood at the top of the authorities' "most wanted" list, why would they need a paid informer merely to identify him? It defies common sense that officials who had been monitoring his every move did not know what he looked like.

And if the arresting party somehow could not distinguish Jesus from his disciples in the darkness, why not arrest the entire group? As his devoted followers, they presumably shared-- and would continue to spread-- the same alleged "blasphemous" teachings. The authorities of the period were hardly restrained by modern notions of civil liberties or due process.

The ruthless methods used to suppress threats by Jewish, as well as Roman authorities, is illustrated by the actions of Herod Archelaus, who succeeded his father, King Herod the Great, as ruler of Judea. During the Passover festival, a massive uprising erupted in Jerusalem against his newly established rule.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).