Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 4/27/19

Establishment and Exercise

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   6 comments
Author 1890
Message Paul Cohen

Bill of Rights Pg1of1 AC.
Bill of Rights Pg1of1 AC.
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ...

So begins the Bill of Rights. This First Amendment to our Constitution guarantees these two rights in what are often called its establishment clause and its free exercise clause; significantly, their placement at the start of the very first amendment suggests how important these rights must have seemed in the early days of our country. The words are simple and we mostly think we understand what these clauses mean, but as with other parts of the Constitution, the courts and even ordinary citizens can and do disagree; for example, what do the terms, establish and free exercise, actually mean. But we might also, and much more fundamentally, ask what religion should mean in the context of the Constitution.

Wikipedia observes that there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion. How to interpret the word "religion" may not be clear but the importance of its interpretation within the Constitution is quite important. The legal meaning of a word is often broader than the common usage would suggest; a well-known example is the inclusion of corporations within the legal notion of "person".

- Advertisement -

Elsewhere, Wikipedia does offer the opinion that a religion is a set of beliefs that is passionately held by a group of people that is reflected in a world view and in expected beliefs and actions. I might add a simple additional qualification that a belief system that is universally believed or universally disbelieved is not a religion; for example, physics surely is not a religion even though the fundamentals of physics surely constitutes a (nearly) universally system of belief and that system is passionately believed. But attempts to add some additional constraints to narrow the definition of religion would seem to risk omitting what are some widely recognized religions and some do not revolve around gods or spirits.

But from another point of view, what surely motivated putting religious rights at the very start of our Bill of Rights very likely were memories of the oppression and the wars that had been fought in Europe in the name of one or another religion. Putting religious rights at the very start of the First Amendment must have in part come from a desire to insulate this country from this kind of damage and divisiveness. These religious rights were surely formulated at least in part as a plea for tolerance. The First Amendment was likely written in the hope that differing belief systems, especially when passionately held, would not become a cause for dispute, for war or for oppression.

Times have changed and it seems that wars of the current era are more commonly fought over economics than over religious doctrine. So perhaps our understanding of the First Amendment should be broadened and we should now consider capitalism as just one more example of a religion. Capitalism surely meets the Wikipedia definition as a belief system that is passionately held. Communism and socialism (and even classical competitive small-business capitalism) show capitalism not to be universally held.

- Advertisement -

Moreover, the world has experienced oppression and war as a battle between capitalism and communism. We return to the earlier question--does it now make sense that, at least for the purpose of interpreting the First Amendment, capitalism should be considered to be a religion? If so, has it in fact become an established religion of the United States in violation of the establishment clause? Has our government, in violation of the free exercise clause, prohibited the free exercise of economics?

If the answers are yes, then in all fairness we have to consider alternatives to capitalism such as socialism or communism to be also treated as religions. They surely should, though these alternatives are today very distant from being a religion established by our government.

If we are to consider capitalism and socialism to be religions, then the notion of fairness should take an historical perspective in much the same way that affirmative action tried to compensate for the historical wrongs inflicted by slavery. So long as these alternative economic systems have not gained a dominant position, efforts like encouraging unions or worker co-ops should not be interpreted as steps toward the establishment of a state religion, but rather as an effort to correct past wrongs done to unions and cooperatives because of the history of our government tilting the scales in favor of private corporations through lavish subsidies, favorable legislation and lucrative tax treatments. But likewise, to continue such supports even after a system of beliefs becomes dominant clearly suggests that that system has become a belief system (religion) established by the government.

If economic systems are to be interpreted as religions so as to fall under the first clauses of the First Amendment then should any other systems of belief be likewise included? The more general question is whether our our Constitution should be guided by the more general principle of fairness? Should we expect that it should avoid putting its heavy hand on the scale in any system of belief that falls well short of universal acceptance?

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Paul Cohen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A concerned citizen and former mathematician/engineer now retired and living in rural Maine.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Pays Taxes?

Liberate Yourself from the Mainstream Media

Who Pays Taxes II

Rethinking Which Voting System is Best

Conservatives Without Conscience

Can Less be Better?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments


Paul Cohen

Become a Fan
Author 1890

(Member since Jun 15, 2006), 3 fans, 59 articles, 26 quicklinks, 1177 comments, 12 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Generally, when I used the term "capitalism" in this article I was thinking of the kind of monopoly capitalism we are familiar with today; another alternative to that is the kind of competitive capitalism that Adam Smith had in mind where government oversight to avoid the formation of monopolies.

These two, very different forms of capitalism exist side-by-side, much as the different forms of Christianity or of Islam do.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:13:24 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 21 fans, 3 articles, 17261 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Yes, we "should be guided by "the more general principle of fairness".

As for religion why not use:

"I know it when I see it."

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 3:00:23 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Paul Cohen

Become a Fan
Author 1890

(Member since Jun 15, 2006), 3 fans, 59 articles, 26 quicklinks, 1177 comments, 12 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to BFalcon:   New Content

Sure, I'm not saying I expect this to happen soon but it surely will never happen if there is no public demand for expanding the definition. In turn, that demand is not going to come about unless the idea is discussed.

We're not accustomed to thinking of capitalism as a religion, but at least to me, it doesn't seem to fall far from that target. I'd say that the idea of a corporation being a person with constitutional rights falls much further from its target except perhaps to lawyers.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 4:52:39 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 21 fans, 3 articles, 17261 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Paul Cohen:   New Content

Throughout history there were 'accusations' that some people have money as their god. And any ideology is 'half-religion'.

Let us not "establish" nor "prevent free exercise of" any "organized thought".

I could live with that. I love individual thinking.

Submitted on Sunday, Apr 28, 2019 at 12:07:57 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

William WAUGH

Become a Fan
Author 505853

(Member since Jun 8, 2016), 71 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

No.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:49:18 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Paul Cohen

Become a Fan
Author 1890

(Member since Jun 15, 2006), 3 fans, 59 articles, 26 quicklinks, 1177 comments, 12 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to William WAUGH:   New Content

William,


I was hoping that this article would generate some discussion, so thank you for that concise response. But maybe you could elaborate.

Submitted on Sunday, Apr 28, 2019 at 12:46:33 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment