Do we need to say that the BBC reported several of the alleged hijackers alive and well within a week or so of 9/11? One was shocked to hear what he was alleged to have done. (See my comment, "The One Era in Human History...," below, on Osama bin Laden and numerous other anomalies.)
President Bush already had orders to invade Afghanistan ready for signing on his desk by 9/11.
The cabinet immediately discussed invading Iraq within a few days of 9/11 even though it was alleged that the whole event was orchestrated from a cave in Afghanistan. Newly-appointed Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill told CBS that regime change in Baghdad was topic A in the National Security Council right from day one.
Before I give you the bottom line here, if I have your attention (and I thank you for reading this far), I want to apologize to all Muslims who have been blamed, racially-profiled, and stigmatized for the events of 9/11. As far as I can see, 9/11 had nothing to do with you. You again were innocent victims.
What is the bottom line here? The bottom line is that there is no “war on terrorism” unless you could consider the people who staged 9/11 the terrorists. That would make George Bush and Dick Cheney terrorists. Certainly their behavior since then shows them to be so.
You must understand me. I mean that you can go out in the sunshine today and say "The war on terrorism is a fraud." If you didn't mind getting thrown in the clink, you could tell that to the next policeman you meet at the airport.
The bottom line is that there are no reasons of “national security” for hiding all the details of 9/11. There is only “fear of impeachment.”
Every time you hear a terrorist alert go off, you are being snowballed.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
