Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 90 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds      

What's wrong with S 1487? Let us count the ways...

By       (Page 17 of 22 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Teresa Hommel
Message Teresa Hommel
The EAC will accredit laboratories which can do certification testing. If the EAC revokes, terminates, or suspends the accreditation of a laboratory, or has "credible evidence of significant security failures" at a lab, the EAC shall notify Congress, the chief State election official of each State, and the public.[52]

Wrong!

Full payment for testing only upon completion of tests can prevent small labs from doing this work.

It is unclear what purpose is served by secrecy regarding which lab is testing which product.

The EAC has to provide notification of evidence of security failures only if, in the EAC's discretion and judgment, the evidence is "credible" and the failure is "significant."

Solution

The law should require partial payment to small labs at milestones in testing.

The law should require the EAC to post notification on its web site of any evidence of security failures, because the credibility and significance often can be evaluated only in hindsight after patterns become clear.

16. Absentee Voting

States shall permit any persons to vote by absentee, and process their ballots as absentee ballots under State law, starting 1/1/08.[71]

Wrong!

Whether or not to implement "no-fault" absentee voting is a decision that each state should make, and this decision should not be imposed by federal law.

No-fault absentee voting may increase the number of ballots that are not included in the election-night tallies and that are counted much later than on election day.

Extra security precautions and citizen observers would be needed to provide security for increased numbers of absentee ballots, which historically have been a favored target for various types of fraud.

Solution

Federal law should leave the decision to implement no-fault absentee voting to the states. This section should be eliminated.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Teresa Hommel Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Teresa Hommel is a voting activist in NY and chair of the Task Force On Voting Integrity, Community Church of New York.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's Not Too Late! Push Hillary for Recount in 6 Key States

What Can We Do Now To Protect the November Election

What's wrong with S 1487? Let us count the ways...

ACTION ALERT! Amend HR811--contact your members of Congress ASAP

HAVA and HR 811 - Voting Machines' Impact on Minority Communities

New Yorkers, help pass Resolution 2236, to KEEP OUR LEVER MACHINES!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend