Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

What's wrong with S 1487? Let us count the ways...

By       (Page 14 of 22 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Message Teresa Hommel
The bill should explicitly require Ballot Definition Files to be publicly available without limitation.

10. Communications Capability

Voting systems shall not use wireless, power-line, or concealed communications (except for infrared technology if certified with the voting system) but all other kinds of communications capability can be used.[39]

Wrong!

At the least, the exemption for infrared needs to be reworded to exempt only infrared, and not exempt a system with infrared from the prohibition against all other wireless, powerline, or concealed communications.

At best, infrared should not be an exception, since its use is not required for any election-related function and its use is an arbitrary choice of a vendor to load ballot definition files via infrared despite the availability of other simple methods for loading such files.

The entire prohibition is weak, because all forms of communications are easy entry-points for tampering. The focus on specific types of communications (wireless, power-line, and concealed) betrays an unhistorical and superficial understanding of computers, which were subject to break-ins via the older telephone line/modem technology long before wireless and power-line came into use. The listing of specific types of communications will make this section obsolete soon. Nevertheless, if a list is used it should include "dial-up modem networking" or "telecommun-ications" or "connections to the public switched telecommunications network", as well as ultra- or sub-sonic audio transmission.

Solution

The law should ban all communications devices and technologies, known or to be developed, in all voting and vote-tabulating equipment.

11. Internet Connections

Voting machines shall not be connected to the internet, but Election Management Systems and vote tabulating equipment may be connected to the internet.[40,41]

Wrong!

There is no reason whatsoever to allow internet connections to any Election Management System (EMS) or vote tabulating equipment. This paragraph allows EMS, which are used to program ballot definitions, and tabulators to be internet-connected, thus facilitating tampering and denial-of-service attacks.

For example: many jurisdictions do not require poll workers to print and post tally reports PRIOR TO connecting their DREs or optical scanners via telephone line or other technologies to their central tabulator (or EMS system if it functions as the central tabulator) to send in the day's tallies. This paragraph allows tamperers to connect to the central tabulator and put in malicious code so that when individual DREs or optical scanners connect to the tabulator to transmit their tallies, the central tabulator ALTERS their tallies first, then lets them send in the altered tallies. Then the poll workers print the tally reports in the poll site-but the tallies have already been falsified.

This may have been what Clint Curtis was talking about when he testified before a Congressional panel and was asked, if tallies in the central tabulator are altered, won't people notice that the tallies in the poll sites are different? He replied, "Not if I did it!"

Solution

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Teresa Hommel Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Teresa Hommel is a voting activist in NY and chair of the Task Force On Voting Integrity, Community Church of New York.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's Not Too Late! Push Hillary for Recount in 6 Key States

What's wrong with S 1487? Let us count the ways...

What Can We Do Now To Protect the November Election

ACTION ALERT! Amend HR811--contact your members of Congress ASAP

HAVA and HR 811 - Voting Machines' Impact on Minority Communities

New Yorkers, help pass Resolution 2236, to KEEP OUR LEVER MACHINES!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend