Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 3/8/17

We Are the Enemy.

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   44 comments
Author 86186
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert De Filippis
Become a Fan
  (29 fans)


(Image by Thad Zajdowicz)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

There's a very damaging transformation in our country's narrative today. It's the quickness with which we can shut off another person's point of view by labeling them. For instance, if I think reasonable government regulations are a good thing, I can be labeled a moon bat liberal who wants to install communism tomorrow. Or if I object to unnecessary regulations I can be labeled a heartless conservative who doesn't care about the environment.

By confusing simple-mindedness for clarity, we can automatically dismiss the totality of another person's ideas by hearing one opinion we disagree with. Since when did human beings become so simple that we can hear one utterance and know exactly how they feel about everything?

We can't. And this is not critical thinking. It's a visceral reaction that emerges from believing that an opposing opinion automatically disqualifies our own--makes us wrong. It doesn't.

- Advertisement -

Dialoguing with conflicting ideas is what brings about better solutions. But we have this crazy winner-take-all attitude and just know that everything will be better when our side is in power. Well, I don't know about you, but I don't think it's working very well.

Case in point. Now the Dems are out, and the GOP is in. Eventually, this will turn around, and the opposite will be true. Neither party can hold onto power forever. So, we're caught in this merry go round country with so much uncertainty we can cut it with a knife.

We've killed the social dialectic. In classical philosophy, a dialectic is a form of reaching a consensus based on dialogue composed of arguments and counter-arguments. One side is advocating propositions (theses) and the other side is advocating counter-propositions (antitheses). The outcome of such a dialectic at best would be a synthesis or a combination of the opposing propositions.

- Advertisement -

In simpler terms, thesis, antithesis, synthesis equals better solutions. This is generally how social systems progress in civil society. But in this political environment, we never get to synthesis because we're busy shouting our certainties at their certainties. And to make it worse we disqualify the other's propositions before they even present them because they are (fill in the blank).

The first step might be to just listen to the other's proposition with the intention of understanding and not disqualifying. We can always disqualify later. But first, let's understand each other. This would be an enormous improvement.

You see, I think this president is doing us a vital service. He's exposing in deep and broad relief, the fault lines in our country. He didn't create them. He's just shining a light into them so we can see who fell in and has been hiding there all along.

This exposure to the real ugliness that resides among us is a gift and a warning. It's a gift that allows us to know our societal faults. It's a warning that highlights the dangers of a political polarized national narrative.

The good news is we can fix it. If we're going to do that and improve everyone's quality of life, we need to take some advice from Pogo. "We've met the enemy, and it's us."

Robert De Filippis

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 11   Must Read 7   Supported 7  
Rate It | View Ratings

Robert De Filippis Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Author, columnist, and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I've authored and published seven books: "You, Your Self and the 21st Century,"The Flowers Are Talking to Me," and "Faith (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth