Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Pentagon's Great Wall of Impotence

By       Message Pepe Escobar     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 4   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/7/16

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (175 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from RT

South China Sea patrol Fleet.
South China Sea patrol Fleet.
(Image by kougun2007, Channel: kougun2007)
  Permission   Details   DMCA


- Advertisement -
No one ever lost money betting on the Pentagon refraining from exceptionalist rhetoric.

Once again the current Pentagon supremo, certified neocon Ash Carter, did not disappoint at the Shangri-La Dialogue -- the annual, must-go regional security forum in Singapore attended by top defense ministers, scholars and business executives from across Asia.

Context is key. The Shangri-La Dialogue is organized by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which is essentially a pro-Anglo-American think tank. And it takes place in the privileged aircraft carrier of imperial geostrategic interests in South East Asia: Singapore.

- Advertisement -
As expressed by neocon Carter, Pentagon rhetoric -- faithful to its own estimation of China as the second biggest "existential threat" to the US (Russia is first) -- revolves around the same themes; US military might and superiority is bound to last forever; we are the "main underwriter of Asian security" for, well, forever; and China better behave in the South China Sea -- or else.

This is all embedded in the much ballyhooed but so far anemic "pivoting to Asia" advanced by the lame duck Obama administration -- but bound to go on overdrive in the event Hillary Clinton becomes the next tenant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Real threats are predictably embedded in the rhetoric. According to Carter, if Beijing reclaims land in the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, "it will result in actions being taken by the both United States and ... by others in the region."

What's left for China, in Pentagonese, is just to be a member of a hazy "principled security network" for Asia -- which will also help protect the East against "Russia's worrying actions." Carter mentioned "principled" no less than 37 times in his speech. "Principled" cheerleaders so far include Japan, India, the Philippines, Vietnam and Australia.

So here's an instant translation: we do a NATO in Asia; we control it; you will answer to us; and then we encircle you -- and Russia -- for good. If China says no, that's simple. Carter proclaimed Beijing will erect a "Great Wall of self-isolation" in the South China Sea.

- Advertisement -

If this is the best Pentagon planners have to counteract the Russia-China strategic partnership, they'd better go back to the classroom. In elementary school.

Navigate in freedom, dear vassals

Predictably, the South China Sea was quite big at Shangri-La. The South China Sea, the throughway of trillions of US dollars in annual trade, doubles as home to a wealth of unexplored oil and gas. Stagnated and increasingly irrelevant Japan, via its Defense Minister Gen. Nakatani, even advanced the Japanese would help Southeast Asian nations build their "security capabilities" to deal with what he called "unilateral" and "coercive" Chinese actions in the South China Sea. Cynics could not help to draw similarities with Imperial Japan's Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.

The Beijing delegation kept its cool -- to a point. Rear Admiral Guan Youfei stressed, "The US action to take sides is not agreed by many countries." Youfei -- the head of the Chinese office of international military cooperation -- did not refrain though from condemning a "Cold War mentality" by the usual suspects.

As for Japan, China's Foreign Ministry detailed that "countries outside the region should stick to their promises and not make thoughtless remarks about issues of territorial sovereignty." Japan has absolutely nothing to do with the South China Sea.

Beijing's reclamation work on reefs in the South China Sea naturally put it in direct conflict with Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. So US meddling -- under the convenient cover of "freedom of navigation" -- had to be inevitable. "Freedom of navigation" operations are a silly intimidation game in which a US Navy ship or plane passes by a Chinese-claimed island in the South China Sea.

It was up to Admiral Sun Jianguo, Deputy Chief of the Joint Staff Department of China's Central Military Commission, to cut to the chase, stressing "the provocation of certain countries" and adding that "selfish interests" have led to the South China Sea issue becoming "overheated." He slammed the Pentagon for double standards and "irresponsible behavior." And he slammed the Philippines for taking the conflict to a dubious UN arbitration court after breaching a bilateral agreement with China; "We do not make trouble but we have no fear of trouble."

U.S. Secretary of Defence Ash Carter meets with South Korea's Minister of Defence Han Minkoo (R) and Japan's Minister of Defence Gen Nakatani for a trilateral at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore June 4, 2016.
U.S. Secretary of Defence Ash Carter meets with South Korea's Minister of Defence Han Minkoo (R) and Japan's Minister of Defence Gen Nakatani for a trilateral at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore June 4, 2016.
(Image by Secretary of Defense)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

The Chinese position prefers dialogue and cooperation -- and Jianguo re-stressed it, calling for ASEAN to make a move. In fact China has already reached what is called a four-point consensus with Brunei, Cambodia and Laos on the South China Sea two months ago. The Philippines are a much harder nut to crack -- as the Pentagon is taking no prisoners to lead Manila "from behind."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 6   Well Said 4   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?