68 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/7/16

The Pentagon's Great Wall of Impotence

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   3 comments
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (190 fans)

Even Vietnam, via Deputy Defense Minister Nguyen Chi Vinh, made it clear -- in the same plenary session as Admiral Jianguo -- that Vietnam prefers solutions via the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as well as negotiation between China and ASEAN.

Bend over to our rules -- or else

After Shangri-La's rhetorical excesses, the action moved to Beijing, the site of the 8th China-US Strategic and Development Dialogue. That's the annual talkfest launched in 2009 by Obama and then Chinese President Hu Jintao.

Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Zheng Zeguang painted a rosy picture, stressing the exchange of "candid, in-depth views on important and sensitive issues of shared concern." Chinese Ambassador to the US Cui Tiankai once again needed to point out that the relationship is just "too important" to be "hijacked" by the South China Sea. And yet this is exactly the Pentagon's agenda.

Beijing though won't be derailed. As State Councilor Yang Jiechi put it, ASEAN-China dialogue is progressing via what Beijing calls the "dual-track" approach, according to which disputes are negotiated between the parties directly involved. That implies no Washington interference.

Beyond what is discussed either at Shangri-La or at the China-US dialogue, the Big Picture is clear. "Exceptionalistan" planners have molded a narrative where China is being forced to make a choice; either you bend over to "our" rules -- as in the current unipolar geostrategic game -- or else.

Well, Beijing has already made its own choice; and that entails a multipolar world of sovereign nations with no primus inter pares. The Beijing leadership under Xi Jinping clearly sees how the so-called international "order," actually disorder, is a rigged system set up at the end of WWII.

Wily Chinese diplomacy -- and trade -- knows how to use the system to advance Chinese national interests. That's how modern China became the "savior" of global turbo-capitalism. But that does not mean a resurgent China will forever comply with these extraneous "rules" -- not to mention the morality lessons. Beijing knows "Exceptionalistan" would not agree even to divide the spoils in a geopolitical spheres-of-influence arrangement. Plan A in Washington is containment -- with possibly dangerous ramifications. There is no Plan B.

The bottom line -- thinly disguised by the somewhat polite responses to Pentagon threats -- is that Beijing simply won't accept anymore a geopolitical disorder that it did not create. The Chinese could not give a damn to the New World Order (NWO) dreamed up by selected "Masters of the Universe." Beijing is engaged in building a new, multipolar order. No wonder -- alongside with strategic partner Russia -- they are and will continue to be the Pentagon's top twin threat.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 6   Well Said 4   Valuable 4  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend