Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 17 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 3/27/19

Russia-gate is over. But what happened?

By       (Page 1 of 4 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   7 comments
Author 26331
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Reginald Johnson

Finally, some truth has emerged in the long-running Russia-gate scandal.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, after an exhaustive, two-year investigation, concluded that there was no conspiracy between Donald Trump and the Russian government to influence the 2016 presidential election.

The Mueller investigative team employed dozens of attorneys and interviewed more than 500 witnesses. They issued 2800 subpoenas, executed 500 search warrants and issued 230 orders for communications records, according to a statement by U.S. Attorney General William Barr.

On the issue of possible obstruction of justice by Trump, both Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein --- who had originally ordered the Russia probe ---- said they found insufficient evidence in the Mueller report to prove that President Trump had illegally tried to impede the investigation.

The report is clearly a vindication of Trump, who has maintained all along that the claims about collusion with Russia were a hoax.

While Trump and his family still face legal jeopardy from investigations into other matters, the culmination of the Mueller probe marks the effective end of the Russia-gate scandal.

That began in the summer of 2016, when claims were made that Russia had hacked Democratic Party computers and gained information damaging to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in order to undermine her campaign and throw the election to Trump.

About the same time, word of a secret dossier emerged, a document written by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, which claimed that Trump had connections with the Russian government and was doing their bidding. Steele was paid by a firm doing opposition research for the Clinton campaign.

On July 31, 2016, the FBI began an investigation of the Trump campaign.

A McCarthyistic hysteria took over Washington, with pundits, former intelligence officials and lawmakers accusing Trump and his family of being traitors and secretly helping the Russian government and Vladimir Putin.

The frenzy continued unabated for two years, and, after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, ostensibly for his improper handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe, there were bi-partisan demands that a special counsel be set up to look at Russian election interference and possible collusion by Trump.

Mueller, who had been the FBI director for years prior to Comey, was then appointed to conduct the probe.

Although Democratic members of Congress vow to continue the Russia investigation, with several leaders saying they are not satisfied with Mueller's conclusions, it is hard to see how these committee probes will lead anywhere, and more importantly, why the American people would take them seriously.

Polling by USA Today done just before the Mueller report was issued, showed that 50% of the American people agreed with Trump that the Russia collusion investigation was a "witch hunt." Now that the report is out --- essentially clearing Trump --- it is likely that a majority of Americans would be skeptical about the purpose of any further investigations. The House inquiries could in fact turn into a political liability for Democrats heading into the 2020 election season.

While the result of the Mueller investigation has settled the issue of collusion, it did nothing to answer a number of other crucial questions. Just what was the basis for suspecting Trump was compromised by Russia in the first place? Was the Steele dossier a legitimate basis for the FBI launching an investigation? Who was pushing the campaign to paint Trump and his family as traitors?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Reginald Johnson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reginald Johnson is a free-lance writer based in Bridgeport, Ct. His work has appeared in The New York Times, BBC-Online, the Connecticut Post, his web magazine, The Pequonnock, and Reading Between the Lines, a web magazine affiliated with the (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Downgrading Ed Schultz

The UK Poisoning Case: Truth or Fiction?

A Travesty of Reporting

Cut the military budget, fund social needs!

U.S. Foreign Policy: Relentless War

WBAI in Crisis

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: