Send a Tweet
- Advertisement -
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 8/16/19

Cut the military budget, fund social needs!

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 26331
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Reginald Johnson

120712-D-VO565-005
120712-D-VO565-005
(Image by U.S. Department of Defense Current Photos)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Democrats fight for a lot of good things --- steps to combat climate change, a saner immigration system, a more equitable tax system, rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, ending racism and controlling guns. Check, check, check.

But where Democrats keep falling down is on the question of whether to cut the bloated military budget. Many, including presidential candidates, vacillate on this crucial issue. They talk of possible cuts, but don't take a strong public stand. They sidestep critical votes. Others actually support massive increases in the war budget, and back President Trump's outlandish increases in Pentagon spending.

Senate Democrats recently gave strong support for a record $738 billion defense budget outline, backed by President Trump. Democrats voted 38-5 for the plan, which won passage in the Senate. Self-described "Democratic Socialist" presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said previously he would vote against the budget, but did not bother to return to D.C. to actually cast a vote against it. Candidates Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker and Kamala Harris also were absent for the vote on the bill.

- Advertisement -

Why didn't they go back to Washington, blast this wildly excessive budget and cast their votes in opposition? These people are going around the country demanding that we rebuild our infrastructure, invest in education, fund health care and build more affordable housing. They denounce Trump for not addressing critical social needs. But the huge amount of spending on the military siphons billions of dollars away from funding domestic programs. In fact, the massive outlays for the military year in and year out make it impossible for domestic needs to be adequately addressed.

People like Sanders and Warren have to know this fact. But apparently, out of fear they'll be labeled as "weak" on national security or afraid they'll lose votes and contributions from defense contractors and their workers, they hedge on the issue of cutting the military budget.

In some cases, major figures in the party, either running for president or leading the charge to get Trump removed from office, are in fact voting in favor of Trump's reprehensible military-spending plan. Presidential candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, for instance, voted in favor of the Trump budget.

- Advertisement -

And freshman Congress Member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has been in the headlines continuously for the past year -- condemning Trump's immigration policies and calling for the president's impeachment -- voted for the Trump war budget, which passed the House overwhelmingly. Apparently she doesn't care enough to vote "no" on this obscene budget, even though it steals money from domestic needs like education and housing, which are vitally important to the constituents in her mostly poor Bronx-Queens district.

You expect Republicans to go along with sky-high 'defense' spending proposals, year in and year out. You wouldn't think Democrats would be so supportive.

But they are, and this support undermines the pledge by Democrats they will create a government that is more compassionate and addresses domestic needs.

Democrats have to overcome this contradiction, otherwise they cannot continue to claim they are "the party of the people."

The U.S. military budget is by far and away the largest of any country in the world. In fact, American defense spending exceeds the combined total military spending by the next seven countries on the list of the top military spenders.

That list includes China, Russia, France and England, Saudi Arabia, India and Japan.

- Advertisement -

Russia -- often referred to in the American press as a dangerous "enemy" with malevolent intentions towards the U.S. -- has a military budget of about $70 billion, based on 2017-18 figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Our military budget should be cut by at least 30 percent. There won't be the slightest fall-off in U.S. security.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Reginald Johnson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reginald Johnson is a free-lance writer based in Bridgeport, Ct. His work has appeared in The New York Times, BBC-Online, the Connecticut Post, his web magazine, The Pequonnock, and Reading Between the Lines, a web magazine affiliated with the (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Downgrading Ed Schultz

The UK Poisoning Case: Truth or Fiction?

A Travesty of Reporting

U.S. Foreign Policy: Relentless War

WBAI in Crisis

Demanding Action on Fukushima

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   



You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments  Post Comment


Mohammad Ala

Become a Fan
Author 8028

(Member since Oct 1, 2007), 9 fans, 21 articles, 28 quicklinks, 861 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Wars are profitable not peace. Military establishments have brought in billions of dollars to the USA, so wars have not been so bad.

Military cuts will not happen because of its strong lobby group(s).

It is unfortunate that many countries such as Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen to name a few have been destroyed and for MANY years their lands will not be cleaned up so their people will continue to suffer so that military's establishments may continue to bring in billions of dollars.

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:08:25 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Reginald Johnson

Become a Fan
Author 26331

(Member since Nov 14, 2008), 1 fan, 30 articles, 46 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Mohammad Ala:   New Content

I agree. But I think a consensus will be reached to make cuts

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:45:43 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment