Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 5/9/10

Rekers exposed -" another crusader for morality goes down

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   8 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Carol Everhart Roper
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
While there's no dearth of people in all walks of life who end up disappointing those who look up to them, it does seem that extremist Christian Crusaders win the Public Fall from Grace Award with extraordinary frequency.

This time it's Family Research Council cofounder and avowed anti-gay activist George Alan Rekers who happens to be " uh" gay. Make that actively, carelessly, desperately, enthusiastically gay. This is the man who was paid over $60,000 to testify in a case designed to prohibit gays from adopting children.

This time the gay male associate, "Lucien" whose real name is being hidden as his family doesn't or didn't know he is gay, is being called a "travel assistant" hired after Rekers' saw nude photos of him on the website, where apparently he appeared sufficiently able to handle Rekers bags. By the way, Rentboy isn't a travel assistant website, it's a place for men to hire men for sex, and there's nothing modest about it. I suggest a visit to the "must be 18 or older to enter" website for an idea of exactly what Mr. Rekers found impressive.

Rekers claimed he couldn't carry his luggage himself, but was captured on film being the one of the couple who was managing the suitcases, while his young "assistant' stood idly by waiting for an elevator.

After no one bought that line, Rekers then claimed he'd hired the male prostitute to teach him about Jesus Christ. It's certainly possible that the words "Jesus Christ" were uttered, but I'm not sure who converted whom in this one.

In necessary seriousness, I firmly believe any person's sexuality is a private matter. I do not believe anyone should be judged on the gender of their sexual and love partner(s). I find it offensive to read news articles about a person's sexuality. I long for a return to a time when such information was indeed deemed private, and was never considered fodder for any news, not even the prurient rags. It wasn't all that long ago that we had no idea that President Kennedy, for example, had experiences outside the oval office. And other than from a historical perspective, we didn't need to know, as long as it did not interfere with the administration of his duties as President.

However, I believe it is important to 'out' hypocrites. I am, first of all, against crusaders who make stopping queers their life's work in any case, because I believe they are wrong. When they're complete hypocrites about it they must be called to task. Shakespeare had it right "The [gentleman] doth protest too much, methinks!" I believe such people have given up their right to privacy by their antagonistic behavior towards an innocent group of people. Their blatant hypocrisy needs to be exposed, and the issue of pro and anti gay rights needs to be discussed. This sort of thing is truly evidence that sexuality is not a choice, it is how one is born. I am willing to bet that Rekers was consumed with guilt and fear as he was unable to resist fulfiling his natural desires. What a tragedy that THAT is how it was expressed, that he felt forced to hide what was so compelling in his life that he risked, and now has lost, everything. Why does society, why do WE, do this to people?

I hope that the American people and our lawmakers will soon awaken to the fact that this endless parade of "Secretly Gay Crusaders against Homosexuality" is the real abomination, and inspire lawmakers to make sexuality irrelevant when considering things like adoption, marriage, jobs, etc. There are numerous websites like Equality Forum devoted to attaining equality for GLBT people - join them, read about their goals and their lives. They're no different than you, except they happen to love people of the same gender.

The definition of EQUALITY does not have a subcategory of exceptions not gender, not sexuality, not belief, not color, not even intellectual capacity. Nor should we.

Elevator photo: NY Daily News.

Rekers portrait:

Equality Forum Logo:

Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Carol Everhart Roper Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Carol is a writer - The Philadelphia Science Examiner -, and the Philadelphia Freethought Examiner; a painter and (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is there such a thing as an ex-atheist?

Neanderthal genome - our red-headed, muscle-bound siblings live on within us

Neutrino mass disparity may modify the Standard Model of Particle Physics

Gulf Oil Spill- Is BP ignoring a green solution? PART III - the Armageddon scenario

Creationist Kent Hovind's PhD thesis is a jumble of juvenile jabber

Gulf oil spill - Is BP ignoring a green solution? Part II - Like a bird in oil

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend