Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 7/6/19

Political Correctness Is Getting Out of Hand

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   4 comments
Author 512261
Message Chris Wright

Called
Called 'Life of Washington' the mural depicts Washington's slaves picking cotton at Mount Vernon
(Image by sfrichmondreview.com)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

On June 28, the New York Times published an article by Bari Weiss that wasn't moronic.

Titled "San Francisco Will Spend $600,000 to Erase History," it was about the school board's unanimous decision to destroy a New Deal-era mural by the famous Communist painter Victor Arnautoff that's painted on the walls of a local high school. Called "Life of Washington," the mural depicts Washington's slaves picking cotton at Mount Vernon as a group of colonizers walks past a dead Native American. The painting is clearly meant to oppose the sanitized versions of American history that are taught in most schools.

So you'd think "progressives" would support it. Instead, some of them, at least, find it so offensive they want it gone. "A grave mistake was made 80 years ago to paint a mural at a school without Native American or African-American input," the school board's vice president told Weiss. "For impressionable young people who attend school to have any representation that diminishes people, specifically students from communities that have already been diminished, it's an aggressive thing. It's hurtful and I don't think our students need to bear that burden."

- Advertisement -

It seems that most students object to the mural's removal, though a number of community members support the board's decision. "We know our history already," a recent high school graduate and member of the Tohono O'odham tribe said. "Our students don't need to see it every single time they walk into a public school."

Predictably, Weiss's article confines itself to admonishing liberals and leftists for being "un-American" snowflakes, failing to point out that conservatives are typically far more eager to censor than the left is. Bashing hyper-sensitive leftists seems to be Weiss's favorite activity, aside from hyper-sensitively complaining about supposed instances of anti-Semitism that are usually nothing more than criticisms of Israel's horrifying militarism and near-genocidal policies towards Palestinians. (I didn't see her write a column bewailing what a "snowflake" Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti was for advocating the destruction of an "anti-Semitic" mural in L.A. that depicts Israel as the Grim Reaper.)

But leaving aside Weiss, who's nothing but a vulgar propagandist, her column does raise an important issue. Censorship, the destruction of art, and the sanitizing of history are appropriate agendas for reactionaries and establishment-types like Weiss; progressives and radicals should certainly oppose them. And yet, in the age of "political correctness," there's a disturbing tendency for those on the left to adopt the repressive tactics of their enemies.

- Advertisement -

Whether on social media, on university campuses, or in cultural spaces of whatever sort, people are shunned, shamed, and silenced for not adhering wholeheartedly to a party line. A whiff of dissent brings down the wrath of the mob; a statement or an image that someone, somewhere, might find hurtful is enough to end your career or ruin your life. Magazine editors are fired for defending "cultural appropriation," as in 2017 when an editor in Canada lost his job for the crime of defending the right of white authors to create characters from other backgrounds. Safe spaces, trigger warnings, microaggression reporting systems, call-out culture, and other such devices become ever more ubiquitous, threatening to neuter culture and intimidate even fellow leftists into silence.

In the end, all this excess reaches truly farcical extremes: political correctness eats itself, as a wonderful old mural that tells a people's history of the United States is destroyed for being "degrading." A paradigm of identity politics that celebrates and weaponizes victimhood brings forth practitioners who claim they're being victimized by having to be reminded of their history as victims. In the name of "empowerment," they want to whitewash a mural whose existence is a blow against whitewashed history, which is the very thing to which identity politics indignantly objects. Political correctness chokes on itself and coughs up self-refuting paradoxes.

In this grotesque autosarcophagy we see the reductio ad absurdum of this whole mode of aggressive liberalism: it becomes a kind of void, a black hole of infinitely dense inhumanity, the postmodern left's version of cultural totalitarianism. It becomes kitsch, virtually without content except to prevent members of "vulnerable" groups from ever feeling the slightest pang of discomfort. That's the universal standard, the standard of acceptable art, acceptable speech, acceptable politics, and acceptable thought. And if you stray outside the bounds of acceptable thought, we'll "cancel" you, hopefully most aspects of your identity: career, social life, public life, especially internet life, since the beautiful anonymity and atomization of the internet are what allow us to besiege you and call out your transgressions against orthodoxy. Ultimately it isn't permittedor at least it's testing our good willeven to state manifest truths, such as that men on average are taller and physically stronger than women, or that, e.g., women tend to be attracted to male dominance (e.g., men taller than they) and the dominant male. No such truths we consider insulting to "marginalized" people can be acknowledged.

Now, as I said, these totalitarian trends are only the reductio ad absurdum of political correctness, and do not invalidate the entire phenomenon known as PC culture. Historically, this multicultural politics that emerged from the radical movements of the 1960s and '70s has had very constructive effects on society. It has been integrally tied to the collective recognition of real history, the history of Native Americans, African-Americans, immigrants, women, and European colonialism. In educational curricula, it has effectively challenged the supremacy of the Western canon of white male writers, such that students now encounter voices from many different cultures and traditions.

Feminism has raised consciousness to a far more civilized level than in the 1960s, when Betty Friedan could write about "the feminine mystique" that dehumanized women. The MeToo moment is just the latest front in a long war to advance women's rights. Similarly, we have identity politics to thank for the historic victories of the gay rights movement, which have at long last made homophobia disreputable.

Even the much-derided concept of "microaggressions" denotes a real situation that minorities and women face. Nathan Robinson of Current Affairs gives examples. When a female physician wearing a stethoscope is repeatedly mistaken for a nurse, that surely gets irritating and can be seen as offensive. When a white woman clutches her purse as a black or Hispanic man approaches, that's a racist microaggression. A particularly egregious example is the time when a black student asked her academic advisor for information about majoring in biology and, "without being asked about her academic record (which was excellent), was casually directed to 'look up less-challenging courses in African American Studies instead.'" Whatever the Supreme Court thinks, the U.S. is still saturated with racism, and unconscious racism is constantly revealing itself in trivial interactions in every social context.

- Advertisement -

Identity politics and political correctness are far from being the unmitigated evils Donald Trump and Bill Maher apparently think they are. And it's true that in popular movements, excess is inevitable. From the French Revolution to the New Leftand now to the new New Leftpopular enthusiasm has been apt to get out of control and become absurd and even violent (as with Antifa). But that doesn't mean the excess shouldn't be fought when it becomes truly damaging. When a mode of politics starts to ruin the lives of innocent people, discourage independent and honest thinking, and advocate the destruction of valuable works of art, it's time to rein it in.

One of the most striking features of the extreme fringe of political correctnessa fringe that seems to dominate culture more and moreis one of the least talked about: often, it is just a sublimation of the very conditions of neoliberal capitalism that leftists hate. Interpersonal atomization and alienation, gleeful cruelty, schadenfreude run amok, censorship and suppression of dissent, a universal leveling that valorizes groupthink as the highest virtue, and surveillance of daily life and every interaction: these tendencies of late capitalism are somehow refracted into left-wing forms and concerns. The mechanism, actually, of this ironic 'refraction' is probably quite simple: society has become so inhuman and depersonalized, so bureaucratized and anonymized, that people all across the political spectrumnot only leftistsare made pettier, more insecure, sensitive to perceived slights, and mean-spirited (especially online).

We see the "Other" as oppressing ushowever each of us defines the Otherand we lash out to punish it or those who we think manifest it at any given moment. This punitive mentality at least gives us little malicious pleasures that partly compensate for the indignities we're constantly suffering.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Chris Wright Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Necessity of "Lesser-Evil" Voting

Political Correctness Is Getting Out of Hand

An Ode to Chomsky

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments


Daniel Geery

Become a Fan
Author 1198

(Member since Jul 9, 2009), 70 fans, 337 articles, 3538 quicklinks, 16291 comments, 180 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Just gave high ratings, but recommend double checking Chomsky on his 9/11 "ideas."

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 6, 2019 at 4:23:33 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Kenneth Lee

Become a Fan
Author 6860

(Member since Jul 8, 2007), 3 fans, 5 articles, 1 quicklinks, 242 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

All these actions, i.e., removal of statues of historical characters, destroying murals depicting 'offensive' behavior, stifling 'offensive' speech or signs, etc. do NOTHING but limit or totally eliminate DISCUSSION. Without discussion and diversity of opinion there will never be any advancement of this culture. I frequently think that is, in fact, the goal and that many of us are simply being led to believe that we are 'good liberals' if we show enough outrage at the aforementioned expressions of art and thought. I fear no words, statues or paintings because they are not acting UPON me, they are simply stimuli for further thought, quite the opposite of a bullet coming out of a gun pointed at my head.

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 6, 2019 at 8:02:09 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Zef Rose

Become a Fan
Author 94870

(Member since Aug 2, 2014), 4 fans, 99 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Consider how much we know about the past because we are able to observe the things they left behind, like their art and literature, and accounts of our history written by the actual witnesses.

Consider that invading armies destroy paintings, statuary, whole libraries, as a means of wiping out the spirit of a civilization. And it has to start over from scratch.

Consider how often we have repeated that atrocity. We must learn from the past, through their vestiges. If we destroy our own art and literary history, we are depriving our future of anything they can learn from what is now our present.

When you get rid of certain things that carry certain ideas, there is no longer anything to discus. It may seem on the surface wise to destroy the things you find offensive, but are you sure you are wise enough to make that call? Are you certain that yours is the proper attitude? Have you considered all the ramifications? Without evidence of the past, communication is cut off, and though the fighting continues, nobody knows why anymore.

You can't sanitize a culture that is unsanitary at its heart by removing the extant evidence of the history that has made it so; you only destroy history, and doom your descendants to an incomplete and incorrect record of their past.

We learn from our history, and that is why conquering armies always destroy the evidence of said history first, and replace it with their own version.

Political correctness is the battle cry of the invading army, spawned right here at home, that will scrape away layer by layer all of the clues to how we can improve our civilization. Anyone who advocates the removal of art, statuary, books, articles, videos, sentences, words and paragraphs, just in order to make sure nobody's feelings get hurt, can not possibly have any interest in creating or maintaining a healthy society.

All we will have left after they implement their final solution is a limited collection of selected historical "facts" written by the despots of the time. And we as a society will have to start all over again. Again and again.

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 6, 2019 at 8:52:48 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Kenneth Lee

Become a Fan
Author 6860

(Member since Jul 8, 2007), 3 fans, 5 articles, 1 quicklinks, 242 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Every statue torn down, every mural painted over or book(s) BURNED at the very least destroys the opportunity for teaching moments, and at the very worst removes actual history in order to supplant it with manufactured history. I STRONGLY recommend viewing Season-4 Episode-23 of STAR TREK: VOYAGER entitled " Living Witness". It will bring this home to you far better than can I.

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 6, 2019 at 9:02:35 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment