Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 3/30/19

Here's the Real Trump-Russia Hoax

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   14 comments
Author 90177
Message David Corn
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

From Mother Jones

- Advertisement -

It's Trump defenders and lefty Russia-gate skeptics claiming there is no scandal.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergei Kislyak meets US President Donald Trump in Washington, DC. on May 10, 2017.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergei Kislyak meets US President Donald Trump in Washington, DC. on May 10, 2017.
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Sputnik)
  Details   DMCA

There has been much crowing from Trumpsters on the right and Russia-gate skeptics on the left about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report. That is, the three-and-a-half-page letter Attorney General Bill Barr sent to Congress summarizing Mueller's work. (The report itself remains secret and is reportedly over 300 pages.) Pointing to Barr's citation of a single, partial sentence from the report ("[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities"), Trump and his partisans, as well as the small number of lefty Russia-gate deniers, have declared that because Mueller found no direct collaboration, the Trump-Russia scandal is kaput. Some have even declared it was a hoax -- and a gargantuan media con job -- from the start.

- Advertisement -

These critics are wrong. And here's an easy way to tell whether they are engaging in honest discourse.

Two fundamental facts were established long before Mueller completed his investigation. First, the Russians attacked an American election in order to sow chaos, hurt Hillary Clinton, and help Donald Trump. Second, Trump and his top advisers during the campaign repeatedly denied this attack was underway, echoing and amplifying Moscow disinformation (the false claim that Russia was not attacking). Whether or not the Trumpsters were directly in cahoots with the Russian government, they ran interference for Vladimir Putin's assault on the United States, and they even did so after the intelligence community had briefed Trump on Russia's culpability.

So to determine if the Barr triumphalists are acting in good faith, you need only ask them a simple question: do you accept these basic facts and acknowledge the profound seriousness of each one?

- Advertisement -

The Russian attack on the 2016 election was an attempt to subvert the foundation of American society: the democratic process. How can Americans have faith in their government, if elections are undermined by secret schemers, including a foreign government? It is certainly arguable that the Russian intervention -- particularly the stealing and drip-drip-drip dumping of the John Podesta emails across the final four weeks of the election -- was one of several decisive factors in a contest that had a narrow and tight finish. Consequently, there is a strong case that Moscow helped shift the course of US history by contributing to the election of Trump. (And recognizing this is not the same as defending Hillary Clinton or concocting an excuse for the Democrats' embarrassing loss to Trump.)

During the campaign and afterward, some Trump backers and some critics on the left, including columnist and media scold Glenn Greenwald, questioned whether the Russians indeed engaged in such skulduggery. (The Nation, where I once worked, published an article -- promoting a report that claimed the Russians did not hack the Democratic National Committee -- and then had to backtrack when that report turned out to be bunk.)

For many of these scandal skeptics, it hasn't seemed to matter that the charge against Moscow has been publicly confirmed by the Obama administration, the US intelligence community (which concluded that Putin's operation intended to help Trump), both Republicans and Democrats on the congressional intelligence committees, and Robert Mueller, who indicted a mess of Russians for participating in this covert operation. True, there often is cause to question officialdom and government sources. Yet anyone citing the Mueller report, as it is narrowly capsulized by Barr, must also accept his key finding: Russia attacked the United States and intervened in the election. (They must also accept that, as the Barr letter disclosed, Mueller found evidence suggesting Trump obstructed justice but did not reach a final judgment on this question.)

Moscow's intervention was an outrageous action, and concern about this should unite right and left and anyone in between. There is nothing more important in this whole affair than the attack itself. Those who are not profoundly distressed about the consequences and implications of that assault -- including those who instead focus more on distractions, such as conspiracy theories about the Deep State or the role of the Steele dossier -- should answer this question: Is it because you don't truly care this happened, or is it because acknowledging this reality interferes with your ideological or partisan loyalties? Or is it both? It is hard to see how a possible misuse of wiretapping authority by the Obama administration (an unproven assertion hurled by Republicans) or possible overstatements from Democrats or liberal pundits about Trump-Russia connections (which leftist skeptics have cited) could be more important than an attack on the US political system that was a factor in the outcome of the election.

Back to the second fundamental fact. On Tuesday, Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, responding to the Barr letter, proclaimed, "The idea that any of us, and me as a campaign manager, would cheat, steal, lie, cut corners, talk to Russians, was an insult from the beginning." Her statement was a lie about lying.

The public record is undeniable: Trump campaign people communicated with Russians during the campaign numerous times. Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner met with a Russian emissary who they were informed would slip them dirt on Hillary Clinton as part of a secret Kremlin plot to help Trump's campaign. Manafort, while serving as Trump's campaign chairman, secretly met with a Ukrainian-Russian business associate named Konstantin Kilimnik who was a go-between with Oleg Deripaska, a Putin-friendly Russian oligarch. Manafort handed Kilimnik private campaign polling data and discussed a so-called peace-plan that presumably would involve lifting sanctions on Russia. (According to Mueller, the FBI has concluded that Kilimnik was associated with Russian intelligence.)

- Advertisement -

Not to mention that through much of the summer of 2016, Trump foreign policy aide George Papdopoulos, according to Mueller, was trying to set up an "off the record" meeting with Putin's office. Carter Page, another foreign policy adviser, spoke with Russian officials in Moscow, where he made a speech assailing the West's tough stance against Putin for his violent intervention in Ukraine.

All of this occurred while Russia was attacking the United States. (Manafort met with Kilimnik and Papadopoulos reached out to Putin's office after it had been reported that Russia was the likely culprit in the hack-and-dump operation seeking to influence the US election.) And these contacts happened as Trump and his campaign -- most notably, Trump Jr. and Manafort -- were also publicly denying that any such attack was underway.

These denials had no basis in fact and ran counter to what cyber-security experts were saying -- but they precisely echoed what the Russians were saying: It ain't us! The combination of public denials and private contacts could only have been read as encouragement by Moscow. Trump at one point even called on Russia to hack Clinton's emails, and, according to a Mueller indictment, Russian government hackers attempted to do so that very evening.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

David Corn Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

David Corn is  Mother Jones ' Washington bureau chief. For more of his stories,  click here . He's also  on  Twitter  and  FacebookRSS  |    David is (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why the Bombshell Trump Letter Could Be a Big Problem for Donald Trump Jr.

Can Obama Disrupt the Shutdown Narrative?

Note to Robert Mueller: Hope Hicks Was Part of the Cover-Up

House Dems Already Have Their List of Trump Scandals to Investigate. Here It Is.

Here's the Real Trump-Russia Hoax

Why the Scooter Libby Case -- and Trump's Pardon -- Really, Really Matter

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

10 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments


Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 2379 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

YYAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWNNNNNNN.

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 30, 2019 at 4:23:26 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
 
Indent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jun 2, 2011), 44 fans, 70 articles, 3232 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Devil's Advocate:   New Content

(Image by Unknown Owner) Details DMCA

Submitted on Monday, Apr 1, 2019 at 1:01:10 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 2379 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to John Rachel:   New Content

Exactly! I just didn't want to waste the energy finding a pic. (So tired!)

Submitted on Monday, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:20:57 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Al Hirschfield

Become a Fan
Author 512932

(Member since Jan 20, 2019), 2 articles, 14 quicklinks, 15 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Thank you, David! Such lucidity and rationality in this day and age are in short supply...

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 30, 2019 at 11:55:24 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

David Pear

Become a Fan
Author 500873

(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 46 fans, 73 articles, 294 quicklinks, 3207 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

"Mother" Jones must be rolling over in her grave. The publishers, The Foundation for National Progress, and David Corn must be CIA fronts.

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:30:12 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (8+)
Help
 
Indent

Eric Arnow

Become a Fan
Author 503158

(Member since Jul 27, 2015), 8 fans, 597 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to David Pear:   New Content

Aaron Mate, Max Blumenthal and their colleague, Ben( forgot his last name) have an hour long dissection of the Russiagate hoax, directly challenging Corn and Mother Jones as well as several other fake left/ imperialist socialist organizations/media outlets. Include Democracy Now and some writers on the Nation . I dropped my subs to all of those years ago for that reason.


But this coopting of Left organizations has been going on since there has been a Left or any variant of socialism or even real democracy.

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:18:36 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (8+)
Help
 
Indent

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784

(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 38 fans, 1 articles, 13 quicklinks, 5084 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to David Pear:   New Content

Yes, one more outrage in an endless list of them by the national security state. David Corn is controlled opposition. It galls me that he has a platform on OpEd.

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 30, 2019 at 8:11:54 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jun 2, 2011), 44 fans, 70 articles, 3232 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Lois Gagnon:   New Content

I'm glad David Corn gets published here. It gives us an opportunity to see how a bright mind goes off the rails, without having such a noxious character in the same room with us.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:53:17 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Brenda Schouten-Beckett

Become a Fan
Author 506668
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Sep 11, 2016), 7 fans, 810 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to David Pear:   New Content

I can't understand how such a nasty little fingernail paring of an article managed to show up on OpEdNews. I only glanced at it because YOU commented so it showed up in my IN box.

Russia "interfered" in our "democracy" to "hurt Clinton"???

Good thing I haven't had lunch yet or it would be all over my keyboard.

Submitted on Sunday, Mar 31, 2019 at 9:20:31 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jun 2, 2011), 44 fans, 70 articles, 3232 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Brenda Schouten-Beckett:   New Content

I caught it too late. I upchucked all over my laptop. Now it's like typing in clam chowder.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:54:29 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Fred W

Become a Fan
Author 8452

(Member since Oct 30, 2007), 1 fan, 172 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I agree with the above comments, and, beside that, want to say one more thing:

No, I really don't care whether the Russians tried to influence our elections! In a perfect world of one person, one vote, such things wouldn't happen, but, given that the US massively interferes with the elections of others, and given that other countries interfered much more in the 2016 election than the Russians are even accused of doing, and given that the Democrats played a big part in some of that interference by other countries, and given that I wish the DNC's emails had been given a lot more coverage and that I'm grateful for any agency that may have helped that exposure, I couldn't care less about any small effect the Russian government may have had. And, furthermore, I think using loaded words like "attack" and "outrageous" are inflammatory and do a great disservice to the cause of peace and cooperation between the US and Russia, and I condemn it.

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 30, 2019 at 6:27:37 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
 

Vernon Huffman

Become a Fan
Author 89433

(Member since Aug 14, 2013), 6 fans, 2 articles, 289 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

It is preposterous to pretend that US elections would be just fine if not for Russian interference! They stand accused of using social media bots to sow confusion (we all know there would be no confusion in social media without those bots) and publishing internal Democratic Party emails.


Can we talk for a moment about what was in those emails, which nobody at DNC has claimed were not theirs? Can we recognize that they disclosed cheating to favor big money's nominee over the popular choice? But the system would work fine if we could just keep those nasty details hidden.


Both corporate parties cheat, but the Republicans cheat better. As an international election observer, I can easily claim that US elections would fail to be certified as free and fair on at least three grounds:

1. The commercial media is seriously biased;

2. Campaign funding is unfairly distributed; and

3. Tally methods lack transparency.


If you're worried about international interference in elections, please check out Israel's influence in US elections or US influence everywhere, including Russia.

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 30, 2019 at 8:54:17 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (7+)
Help
 

Frank Inbun

Become a Fan
Author 79861

(Member since Jun 30, 2012), 3 fans, 232 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

OPED needs to ban Corn.

Submitted on Sunday, Mar 31, 2019 at 12:31:05 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jun 2, 2011), 44 fans, 70 articles, 3232 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Frank Inbun:   New Content

I encourage expressions of idiocy to appear here. David Corn makes the rest of us look like geniuses and saints.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:55:58 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment