Why I like my theory more than other.
I deliberately placed several pretty weird events from the timeline at the head of the article. Why the Hell would Atta spend the day before the act in Portland, ME and then fly(!!!) out off it in the morning to Boston? Why would Bush sit as a sitting duck for about 20 minutes endangering everyone around him? Why would the Israeli company receive a message about a possible terrorist attack in NY and not call at least Rudy Guiliani? Why would the authorities in the Newark Airport let the Flight 93 to take off in the midst of the hijacking( the FAA grounded all the flights at (9:17 am) and why would the terrorists in it wobble back and forth? There are thousands of such questions. I gave explanations to some of them as I saw it but not to all. I just can’t. But neither can other two theories: Osama did it (official one) and It was a total conspiracy, an inside job ( the conspiracy theory).
The official theory is so full of holes that you can make a Swiss cheese of it. But its fundamental flaw is that if we assume it to be the truth then we have to conclude that the whole National Security system of the US was and is either unbelievably negligent or unbelievably corrupt. There were so many signals about the upcoming threat as well as about Atta and others that unless Allah himself protected them they sure as Hell could not handle that alone. Not a chance. But to imagine the whole system to be so dysfunctional is equally unrealistic.
The conspiracy theory relies heavily on the precedent, the burning of Reichstag. In 1933 Goering organized an arson and accused communists which made it possible for the Nazis to destroy the democracy. The idea is that it happened in the same way in the Y2001 to promote war and give special powers to Bush (which he obtained). Although I would not argue with the driving forces here I would argue about the relevancy. The conspiracy theory assumes that the conspirators in our government are monsters- they planned the murder of thousands of the US citizens. That’s unlikely. They are SOBs but not monsters. Even during the Reichstag burning nobody was hurt. Surely, our evil folks are not as evil as Nazis, wouldn’t you think?
To plan mass murder it is not enough to be an SOB. You have to be a professional monster. Such people are made, they do not appear. Professional terrorists are like that, also dictators. Monsters are always SOBs. But not all SOBs are monsters. It is inconceivable to me that even our criminals in power ( although they surely can kill millions in wars) would concoct a plan of such an attack. I sincerely doubt that they are Drs Evils.
As such I like my theory because it is the most humanly plausible in my opinion. Yes, there was a plan. It presumed a great show. But the SOBs were outsmarted by the true evil. That happened many times before. Permit me to be biased.
Weird Things and Smart Cop.
I deliberately placed several pretty weird events from the timeline at the head of the article. Why the Hell would Atta spend the day before the act in Portland, ME and then fly(!!!) out off it in the morning to Boston? Why would Bush sit as a sitting duck for about 20 minutes endangering everyone around him? Why would the Israeli company receive a message about a possible terrorist attack in NY and not call at least Rudy Giuliani? Why would the authorities in the Newark Airport let the Flight 93 to take off in the midst of the hijacking( the FAA grounded all the flights at (9:17 am) and why would the terrorists in it wobble back and forth? There are thousands of such questions. I gave explanations to some of them as I saw it but not to all. I just can’t. Long ago in one of the detective stories I read that the victim of murder prayed for the smart cop. That’s what we needed from the start. We did not need all those commissions. We needed a forensic investigation on the international level, we needed people subpoenaed under oath, we needed blueprints off those buildings sealed as well as the design documents of the similar skyscrapers, we needed an International Trial. But then, of course, we would not have our war. And so great was the push to that war that when in the Y2003 Columbia Shuttle perished that national tragedy did not stop Bush and his masters. Off we went to Iraq to kill more people and the stench of the dead behind us added itself to the stench in front of us. The smart cop, we still need him, where is he?
Why am I publishing this.
I do not claim my theory to be the right one, just a plausible one. The 9/11 event is one of those which define history and I am sure, some Bard from the 23rd Century will write a terrific play ‘The Plot of the Doomed’ or something. The light sometimes is seen from far away. In 1989 Russian engineer A. Chystakov by reexamining the official versions of the 1905 marine battle of Tzusima between the Russian fleet and the Japanese proved beyond any doubt that the Russians lost not because of the genius of the Japanese admiral Togo (as it was an official version for 84years) or because of the stupidity of the Russian Admiral- in – Chief Rozhestvesnky but only due to the design flow in the Russian artillery missiles, the explosive damage yield of which was at total 14 times lower compared to the Japanese ones. Moreover, he proved that the famous ‘Togo maneuver’ still praised in all the Western textbooks was in fact an evasive act trying to escape from an artful trap designed by Rozhestvensky into which Togo brought the whole fleet of his. Chystyakov mentioned that information enough to come to his conclusion was there always, it was open but, ‘people really are more prone to blame other people than to agree that some technical aspect might have decided the whole fate.’
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
