Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 61 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 9/20/09  

Spy vs. Spy—Redacting The Last 8 Years

By       (Page 3 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment

William R Castlelich
Message William R Castlelich

So, what we're basically saying is the only words in 23 pages (albeit short pages) that are not a threat to national security are "Interrogators are required to sign a statement certifying they have read and understand the contents of the folder?"

Really?

And now the evil doers know there's a statement these guys have to sign. Can't the evil doers now say before we start kicking them in the groin, or tying their testicles to electrical wires, or pretending to kill them, or playing loud dentist office music "hey, let me see that paper you signed?" If this is not something to keep secret, I'm not sure what would be. Who are these censors anyway? We need to talk.

Did no one use "the" in 23 pages? I mean in the clause that was permitted "the" is used twice and for the next 23 pages it's never used?

Really?

Was there not another instance in the entire 23 pages where there's a chance to indict the interrogators for not adhering to the guidelines they signed and not reading the folder?

Really?

And "and" was never used? No use of "it?" Not a single "then?"

Really?

I don't mean to nitpick, but this is what Culp would do in I Spy. He and Cosby would have some case they were working on and they'd be bantering good-naturedly back and forth while their nemesis would be executing his plan to destroy the world and Culp and Cosby weren't bantering at all. They were actually nitpicking, nitpicking, nitpicking until "ah ha, I've got it."

So, as an intelligence technique nitpicking is hard to beat.

I nitpick. It's what nitpickers do. So in 23 pages we have only 18 words that are not a threat to national security and we can allow everyone to read?

Really?

"A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls." GW Bush, 43rd President of the United States

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

William R Castlelich Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A writer for over 30 years and political satirist. Of course without a single published piece of merit, which makes me your average American blogger.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why the US Postal Service Will Not Survive

I'd rather be Blowing Sailors than be Banking

The Perfect Republican Argument

My War On Christmas

When Oil Spills Go Nuclear

If it doesn't go in very far, are you still getting screwed?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend