II. And Given that NIST agrees: Free fall is impossible in a building crumpling or collapsing naturally due to structural resistance (Shyam Sunder, NIST);
III. Therefore, NIST understands that it requires no structural resistance for a building to free fall.
IV. Given that NIST showed WTC7 was in free fall;
V. And Given that the only way free fall can occur is to remove all structural resistance at once and that can only be done with a controlled demolition;
VI. Therefore, the free falling WTC7 was a controlled demolition.
(The following follows logically from the above):
Given that it takes at least weeks to plan and prepare a building like WTC7 for a controlled demolition; and given that there is no reason to believe anyone other than "insiders" could have carried out the advanced preparation and actual execution of the controlled demolition of the secure WTC7 ("CIA Building"); therefore the controlled demolition of WTC7 was carried out by "insiders."
Given that WTC7 was brought down on 9/11; and given that there could be no reason to demolish WTC7 other than to be included with the other events on 9/11; therefore, "insiders" also planned and executed the other events on 9/11, i.e., 9/11 was an inside job/false flag event.
Note: I came up with nothing new. David Chandler and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth have been saying the same thing for a long time. I simply reduced it all to the shortest and simplest form to be given to anyone. No need to debate or argue with anyone about all of the many other things that show the official story to be absolutely ludicrous. Just give them the proof and say, disprove it. And even if you do not know anything about 9/11, you can still say to anyone that you have the proof 9/11 was an inside job/false flag event...
(I invite anyone to try to disprove this -- perhaps I do not know what I am talking about. And please, if anyone knows how I could better write the proof, please let me know.)
(Article changed on April 11, 2018 at 21:45)