398 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 83 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Third Constitution of the United States--Latest Revision, September 7, 2012

By       (Page 11 of 12 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   7 comments

Roger Copple
Message Roger Copple
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

Income tax laws should be simplified in ways that do not allow clever people to cheat the government.     

ARTICLE XVII: How this Third Constitution Can Be Modified, or Amended, and How It Can Be Abolished When a Fourth Constitution Is Desired.  

The United States government can be modified or changed through amendments added to the Third Constitution.   It can also be changed when Congress passes new federal laws.   But to change the federal government completely and to abolish this Third Constitution, there has to be a Constitutional Convention to rewrite a new constitution.   

To change the federal government by merely adding amendments to the Third Constitution, the United States Congress must pass any proposed amendment to the Third Constitution with a 60% majority.   Ratification by state legislatures is not required as it was under the second constitution.     

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land.   As mentioned in the first paragraph of this Article, a radically new constitution and government can be formed through a Constitutional Convention.   It can be achieved in a fair, orderly, and nonviolent way.   The American people have a right to make a new constitution, through their chosen representatives, and they have a right to approve or ratify a newly proposed constitution.   Therefore, the decision to create a new supreme civil document will be considered by the American people at every presidential election.  

If at least 60% of the American voters request a Constitutional Convention at the time a new president is elected, then every citizen eligible to vote for a U.S. president shall register with a national political party.   Websites such as www.politics1.com have comprehensive directories of U.S. political parties, so that citizens can study the platforms and political philosophies of various political parties.  

The Constitutional Convention will start meeting the first Tuesday in November, approximately one year after the previous presidential election.   The Constitutional Convention delegates will meet at the Capitol Building in Washington D.C.   There will be 435 delegates chosen from the federal legislative districts using the system of Proportional Representation.   Delegates must live in the states they represent.   The delegates will choose within 30 days one of their own attending delegates to be the Chair Person of the Constitutional Convention, based on a system of Instant Run-off voting.  

Formal discussions and debates of the Convention will use parliamentary procedure, and delegates will strive for consensus decision-making.   The spoken and written words of the delegates must be publicized, and citizens will be allowed to voice their own opinions in the process.

The Convention delegates will work on several revisions of the newly proposed Constitution, in the constant effort to get 51% of the delegates to accept it.   In fact, since the delegates will meet for a maximum of 6 months, they may use all of that time in order to get a higher percentage of approval than 51%, after hearing the arguments of delegates and citizens who disapprove of the newly proposed document. Two years after the previous presidential election, the American people will vote on the latest proposal of the Constitutional Convention delegates.   But if the delegates themselves could not agree on a new, supreme civil document with at least a 51% majority, then the constitution that is currently in place will continue to be officially valid.  

If the proposed constitution is ratified by the American people, it will not be implemented until two years later when new presidential and national congressional terms of office begin, unless 51% of the state legislatures want to implement the newly ratified constitution sooner.  

In summary, once the American voters decide they want a Constitutional Convention, they will have one year to pick national political party delegates that will attend the Constitutional Convention.    The Constitutional Convention delegates will have a maximum of 6 months to create a new Constitution that is approved by at least 51% of the delegates.   Then at the beginning of the next presidential term of office, the new constitution will be implemented.   This allows two years to prepare the infrastructure of the new government.  

The US Congress, the President, and the US Supreme Court will not have the right to control a Constitutional Convention.   They can, however, express their opinions and recommendations in the process.   This concludes ARTICLE XVII and the Third Constitution of the United States.  

Postscript:

Democracy-loving citizens who approve of this Third Constitution may wisely inquire, how can it be ratified according to the Article V specifications of our current Constitution?   Article V of our current Constitution only addresses how amendments can be added to the Constitution.   Article V does not address how to have a Constitutional Convention.    However, Article XVII of the Third Constitution above could be the basis for a new Twenty-Eighth Amendment that could be added to our current constitution.   The new amendment would totally revise Article V of our current Constitution which describes two cumbersome methods for amending the Constitution.

If a Twenty-Eighth Amendment, modeled after Article XVII in the Third Constitution above, was passed, it would permit our current members of Congress to pass new amendments with a 60% majority (in both the House and the Senate) without needing the previously required additional ratification by - of the state legislatures.   That might be a scary thought to many.   However, it would establish a mechanism for the American people to have a Constitutional Convention in the future using a system of Proportional Representation.  

Without a safe, orderly, and fair way in place to have a Constitutional Convention, there could be widespread, violent insurrection in the streets, if and when masses of American people stop tolerating a government of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich.   If that ever happens, the government will simply implement martial law, and that could be the beginning of a new world order, not by our consent.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Roger Copple Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

February 11, 2023 I grew up in a church that said you had to speak in tongues to get saved and go to heaven. I often prayed fervently starting at the age of 5 for the experience in the prayer room at church, where people would cry and wail, (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is COVID-19 a Biological Warfare Weapon?

Integrating Karl Marx and Abraham Maslow

Veganism: Why Doctors Don't Recommend It

The Earth Constitution Is Not Similar to Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum

Extinction Rebellion--Arguments For and Against

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend