In the wake of Brazil's horrific flooding, Australia's monsoon plight, Japan's death toll and California's houses falling into swollen rivers, let's make it clear that nobody ever dies from overpopulation. Let's call into question accelerating "climate destabilization' on a global scale.
Let's assume and accept that burning 84 million barrels of oil every single day of the year must not be causing any change in the biosphere--forget about "carbon footprint'! It's sheer balderdash! Acidified oceans via carbon overload, www.350.org . Not happening! Anywhere from 80 to 100 species suffering extinction 24/7 around the globe because of human encroachment! Can't be happening!
In a stunning article, the late Garrett Hardin wrote a piece about our accelerating predicament, " Nobody Ever Dies of Overpopulation."
You may find this piece at www.TheSocialContract.com .
"Those of us who are deeply concerned about population and the environment -- "eco-nuts," we're called, -- are accused of seeing herbicides in trees, pollution in running brooks, radiation in rocks, and overpopulation everywhere," said Hardin. "There is merit in the accusation.
"I was in Calcutta when the cyclone struck East Bengal in November 1970. Early dispatches spoke of 15,000 dead, but the estimates rapidly escalated to 2,000,000 and then dropped back to 500,000. A nice round number: it will do as well as any, for we will never know. The nameless ones who died, "unimportant" people far beyond the fringes of the social power structure, left no trace of their existence. Pakistani parents repaired the population loss in just 40 days, and the world turned its attention to other matters.1
"What killed those unfortunate people? The cyclone, newspapers said. But one can just as logically say that overpopulation killed them. The Gangetic Delta is barely above sea level. Every year several thousand people are killed in quite ordinary storms. If Pakistan were not overcrowded, no sane man would bring his family to such a place. Ecologically speaking, a delta belongs to the river and the sea; man obtrudes there at his peril.
"In the web of life every event has many antecedents. Only by an arbitrary decision can we designate a single antecedent as "cause." Our choice is biased -- biased to protect our egos against the onslaught of unwelcome truths. As T.S. Eliot put it in Burnt Norton:
go, go, said the bird: human kind
Cannot bear very much reality.
"Were we to identify overpopulation as the cause of a half-million deaths, we would threaten ourselves with a question to which we do not know the answer: How can we control population without recourse to repugnant measures? Fearfully we close our minds to an inventory of possibilities. Instead, we say that a cyclone caused the deaths, thus relieving ourselves of responsibility for this and future catastrophes. "Fate" is so comforting.
"Every year we list tuberculosis, leprosy, enteric diseases, or animal parasites as the "cause of death" of millions of people. It is well known that malnutrition is an important antecedent of death in all these categories; and that malnutrition is connected with overpopulation. But overpopulation is not called the cause of death. We cannot bear the thought.
"People are dying now of respiratory diseases in Tokyo, Birmingham, and Gary, because of the "need" for more industry. The "need" for more food justifies over-fertilization of the land, leading to eutrophication of the waters, and lessened fish production -- which leads to more "need" for food.
"What will we say when the power shuts down some fine summer on our eastern seaboard and several thousand people die of heat prostration? Will we blame the weather? Or the power companies for not building enough generators? Or the eco-nuts for insisting on pollution controls?
"One thing is certain: we won't blame the deaths on overpopulation. No one ever dies of overpopulation. It is unthinkable."
The late Garrett Hardin wrote that piece over 40 years ago. Today, we see our predicament growing by adding 1 billion humans every 13 years to this finite planet. Yet, you will see most countries and all American leaders push for human growth, expansion and development. You will hear about "smart growth'; "slow growth'; "managed growth' and "sustainable development'.
You will not hear anything about "stabilizing human population' in order to live within the carrying capacity of this planet. Why? Because no one ever dies from overpopulation! It's unheard of, unthinkable and totally impossible! Amen!