Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

Divine Justice, but not for us, if Avante wins this lawsuit

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 2483
Message Rebecca Mercuri
Permission granted to OpEdNews to post the following in its entirety
with attribution to Rebecca Mercuri:

Colleagues,

I am writing to draw your attention to the Avante lawsuit that stands
poised to derail much of the VVPAT legislation that many have worked so
hard to put in place for the upcoming election cycles. In particular,
the Avante filing includes a request for damages, injunctive relief, a
jury trial, and asks that the Court enter a judgment that includes
(among other requested remedies):

1) Permanently enjoining the sale of all infringing equipment produced
by Diebold, Sequoia, and ES&S;
2) Recalling all infringing equipment;
3) Destroying or delivering to Avante the infringing equipment;
4) Awarding infringement damages to Avante including treble damages for
willful infringement.

Details can be found at:
http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/avante/avante_complaint.pdf
http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/avante/avante_complaint_exhibit_a.pdf
http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/avante/avante_complaint_exhibit_b.pdf

The suit alleges that the infringements include both DREs and Opscan
equipment. Specifically mentioned are the Diebold AccuVote TS, AccuVote
TSX and AccuVote OS, the Sequoia AVC Edge, VeriVote Printer, AVC
Advantage, Optical Scan 400C and Optech Insight, and the ES&S iVotronic,
iVotronic LS, Real Time Audit Log, AutoMARK, Model 100 Precinct Ballot
Counter and the Model 650 Central Ballot Counter.

The ramifications of this lawsuit are such that VVPATs may not be
available in time to comply with the state laws, that the defendant
vendors may allow this lawsuit to further delay their certification
processes for the add-on ballot printers or other updated equipment, and
that municipalities might need to prepare for the possibility that their
opscan and DRE equipment may be decommissioned. I hope that you will
take the time to digest and disseminate this important information. If
further details are needed, I am available for comment.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Mercuri
mercuri (at) acm (dot) org
www.notablesoftware.com

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Rebecca Mercuri Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Rebecca Mercuri has been in the forefront of the voting integrity movement since 1989. She provides expert witness services for elections and other forensic computing matters.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

FBI vs. Apple: Fake Fight?

National Popular Vote Returns to California

Homebuyer Stimulus Plan -- Won't Work -- Do the Math

Connecting the Dots? Rush Holt, HR 811, and Avante International

COTS and Other Electronic Voting Backdoors

Hawai'i's Instant Runoff Legislation -- Veto Needed

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: