Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 6/30/19

Why Impeach President Trump? (Part 1)

Author 513708
Message Dagmar Honigmann

Broken water bottles
Broken water bottles
(Image by EliPalu)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Although there has been much discussion among Democrats about impeaching President Trump, there has been amazingly little agreement about the grounds - because the President's behavior has broken so many different norms, and because the White House's secrecy has naturally led to suspicions that the reason is to conceal all manner of bad things.

Many of the President's actions are seen as far more serious and harmful than President Clinton's denial that he engaged in oral sex with an intern, and as undermining democracy itself. However, for a President to be removed, two things are necessary: he must have proven himself unsuited for his office, by committing an offense that warrants his removal for the good of the country... and enough members of his own party must agree that he needs to be removed, despite the political harm to their party and their ability to carry out the policies they believe in.

The focus so far has been on what best meets the first requirement - such as the ten or more attempts to obstruct justice that were documented by Robert Mueller's FBI investigation and that over 1,000 federal prosecutors agreed would result in felony charges for anyone other than a sitting President who couldn't be charged. Ten felonies do seem reasonable - and sufficient - grounds for impeachment. However, even if enough Congressional Republicans were to vote yes, a mostly party-line vote still seems likely - so accusations by President Trump that it was being done for political purposes, and therefore yet another "illegal coup attempt", seem downright inevitable. That would be echoed on Fox News and elsewhere, so that many of the President's supporters would merely hear that side of the argument over and over. It's hard to imagine a good outcome if impeachment is on those grounds, or many of the others that have been raised - and in a worst-case scenario, the damage to our country could be severe.

- Advertisement -

For that not to be the case, the grounds for impeachment would probably need to be very different. For example, consider the efforts by Border Patrol agents that I outlined in a previous column: two large-scale efforts to cause the deaths of migrants, undoubtedly including children. Those efforts have involved destroying probably tens of thousands of water jugs left by good Samaritans in desert areas where thousands of deaths had occurred, and arresting those good Samaritans for leaving the water. The water-jug hunts by rogue agents had been occurring under President Obama but were not revealed by the good Samaritans until shortly after President Trump took office, and the first of their arrests occurred hours afterward.

Since then, both efforts have been well publicized. From what I can tell, however, the officials appointed by President Trump (including the various heads of Customs and Border Protection and of Homeland Security) have made no effort to put a stop to either of those efforts by their staff - and President Trump's own response to thousands of murder attempts by federal agents has also been to simply let them continue. (In fact, the President jokingly agreed when a supporter proposed killing migrants directly rather than indirectly; he seemed to find the idea of even more migrant deaths amusing even though the death toll is already over 700 a year... Wouldn't hearing of such public statements in fact seem likely to encourage those rogue Border Patrol agents even further?)

It is true that President Trump has not publicly supported the efforts in question. However, he has apparently tolerated them for years. And even if we assume that was only because all of his officials concealed the news from him, there is still a big problem. Selecting one bad apple could happen to anyone, but when every relevant official responds to charges that their employees are working to commit mass murder, even of babies, with the same shocking silence and inaction, it's hard not to see a pattern in the President's selections. Are those both reasonable grounds for impeachment? If so, we have a very different type of offense... The President's toleration of those activities is harder to write off as normal presidential behavior, and an impeachment attempt is also harder to write off as just a politically motivated attack.

- Advertisement -

Instead, impeachment would represent an attempt to save many lives - and to state that we do not wish to be complicit in mass killings. Even if impeachment couldn't take place until the last day of President Trump's term, wouldn't the latter justify a "yes" vote by every member of Congress - because wouldn't a "no" vote, or refusal to conduct a vote, make our entire nation (and not just those Border Patrol agents and their superiors all the way up to President Trump) guilty of many murders?

I'm not arguing that it's necessarily the best alternative grounds for impeachment - but it shows that there are options that may prove much less devastating for our country. And Congress will probably prepare a list of charges rather than an isolated one, so it could make a good candidate for that list. If others like it show a pattern, that would just make the case for the President being removed more compelling. (And I will mention a similar example in my next column, to prove how a pattern could be shown...)

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Dagmar Honigmann Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dagmar Honigmann is in her sixties and has worked as a writer and educator. She is the daughter of German refugees who made separate middle-of-the-night escapes from East Germany after World War II, in her mother's case with help from an American (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Last of Three Climate Change Perils No One Is Talking About

How Much Harm Might Justice Kavanagh's Confirmation Process Have Caused?

The Second of Three Climate Change Perils No One Is Talking About

Why Impeach President Trump? (Part 1)

What Women Could Have Learned from the Kavanaugh Confirmation Process

The First of Three Climate Change Perils No One Is Talking About

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 99 quicklinks, 4258 comments, 213 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

"Why"? - we can't. So far, Pelosi says "he's not worth it" and the Democrat House Majority are respecting her "political decision" ("off the table" for W Bush) - and no "impeachment hearings" are being held by Nadler in the Judiciary Committee or any other Committee in the House or Senate.

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 30, 2019 at 6:57:20 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

John Jonik

Become a Fan
Author 10030

(Member since Jan 16, 2008), 15 fans, 38 articles, 2162 comments, 6 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Impeachment will no more remove Trump than it did Clinton. It will not withhold or require pay-back, to the tax-paying public, of Trump's salary despite his failures to do his sworn job duties to "preserve, protect and defend" the US Constitution.

We the people are paying Trump to NOT do what he's required to do.

We have better protections from landscapers who take payment but fail their contractual job duties to mow our lawns...and lawn mowing contractors don't swear on a Bible.

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:45:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment