Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 1/30/20

Trump's EPA Is A Huge Cancer Risk

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 15430
Message Sam Pizzigati
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

From Other Words

Industry-friendly regulators are letting chemical companies flood the country with toxins. It should be a scandal.

Chemicals in the Environment
Chemicals in the Environment
(Image by YouTube, Channel: NV atCEPImperial)
  Details   DMCA

This January, President Trump claimed credit for new figures from the American Cancer Society showing "the sharpest one-year drop in cancer death rate ever recorded" between 2016 and 2017.

The society politely pointed out that the Trump administration had nothing to do with this encouraging decline. The new numbers, chief Gary Reedy explained, "reflect prevention, early detection, and treatment advances that occurred in prior years."

Media outlets rushed to relate this latest Trump Twitter flap. But this story doesn't deserve to end there. Something is shaking on the cancer front that needs our full attention.

The Trump White House has packed the Environmental Protection Agency's top echelons with free-market fundamentalists who've set about "freeing" chemical companies from regulations designed to limit the presence of cancer-causing chemicals in our nation's air, water, and soil.

These appointees, Lerner's reporting documents, are working hand in glove with chemical manufacturers, which have spent $1.4 billion on lobbying over the past dozen years.

Those lobbying dollars paid off. Chemical companies now have their pals running the regulatory show and more Americans, as a result, will find themselves fighting cancer.

Americans like Angela Ramirez, a mother in Illinois who traces her personal cancer to a carcinogen known as ethylene oxide. Two years ago, EPA scientists tagged ethylene oxide a clear and present danger and, writes Lerner, proposed a new safety threshold "30 times more sensitive than previous estimates."

Dow Chemical a huge ethylene oxide producer pushed back. Now, the Trump EPA's political appointees are abandoning the standards their own scientists are seeking.

This is "only one of the changes made under the Trump administration," notes Lerner, "that promise to weaken protections for Americans' health, many of which were intended specifically to stave off cancers."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Well Said 1   News 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Sam Pizzigati Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Veteran labor journalist and Institute for Policy Studies associate fellow Sam Pizzigati co-edits Inequality.org, the Institute's weekly newsletter on our great divides. He also contributes a regular column to OtherWords, the IPS national nonprofit editorial service.

Sam, now retired from the labor movement, spent two decades directing the publishing program at America's largest union, the (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Stop a Tax Plan Rigged for the Rich

Getting Granular on America's Income Distribution

The Flacks for Plutocrats Need a New Analogy

Trump's EPA Is A Huge Cancer Risk

New York, New York, What a Less than Wonderful Town

Billionaires Won't Save the World, Just Look at Elon Musk

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


John Jonik

Become a Fan
Author 10030
(Member since Jan 16, 2008), 15 fans, 38 articles, 2391 comments, 6 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Where to find info on economic links EPA officials have to Private Corporate polluters?

That info (which corporations, which officials, how much money involved, etc.) is crucial....essential....basic...and inexplicably missing from environmentalist/progressive rhetoric.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 31, 2020 at 4:56:33 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

John Jonik

Become a Fan
Author 10030
(Member since Jan 16, 2008), 15 fans, 38 articles, 2391 comments, 6 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Same for the FDA...


(Image by Unknown Owner) Details DMCA

Submitted on Friday, Jan 31, 2020 at 5:30:09 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment