Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is running out
of rhetorical ammunition in the US's Holy War
against Syria. Perhaps it's the strain of
launching a NATO war bypassing the UN Security
Council. Perhaps it's the strain of being eaten
for breakfast routinely by Russian Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov.
Hillary has just called on "Western powers" and their Arab stooges -- the NATOGCC compound  that passes for the "international community" -- to "make it clear that Russia and China will pay a price because they are holding up progress" regarding weaponized regime change in Syria.
Howls of laughter in the corridors of the Kremlin and the Zhongnanhai notwithstanding, this shows how desperate the NATOGCC compound is to force regime change in Syria as a stopover in cutting off Iran's privileged connection with the Arab world. And this while Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan -- leading NATO's eastern flank -- itches to attack Syria but can't find a way to sell it to Turkish public opinion.
Into this incandescent context plunges WikiLeaks -- releasing a batch of very embarrassing emails against the Assad system and the NATO rebels as well. A possible side effect will be to inspire waves of so-called progressives all across the West to start supporting the Holy War on Syria. A realistic effect will be to show how unsavory both sides -- the police state Assad system and the armed opposition -- really are.
It's useful to examine what price Washington itself, not to mention its NATO subjects, could be paying for this Holy War branch-out fought with -- who else -- the same bunch of "terrorists" who until yesterday were about to destroy Western civilization and turn it into a giant Caliphate.
Washington, London and Paris have tried -- twice -- to twist the UN Security Council into yet another war. They were blocked by Russia and China. So plan B was to bypass the UN and launch a NATO war. Problem is NATO has no stomach - and no funds -- for a very risky war with a country that can actually defend itself.
Thus plan C is to bet on a prolonged civil war, using the Far-from-Free Syrian Army (FSA), crammed with mercenaries and jihadists, and the band of opportunistic exiles known as the Syrian National Council (SNC).
The SNC has actually called for a Libya-style no-fly zone over Syria -- shorthand for a NATO war. Turkey also formally asked NATO for a no-fly zone. NATO commanders may be inept -- but they have a certain amount of experience with major embarrassment (see Afghanistan). They flatly refused it.
The SNC -- and the FSA -- could not be more un-representative. The "Friends of Syria" -- as in Hillary and the Arab stooges -- barely acknowledge the existence of the National Coordination Body for Democratic Change (NCB), the main indigenous opposition movement in Syria, composed of 13 political parties, mostly from the Left, Arab nationalists and including one Kurdish party. The NCB firmly denounces any form of militarization and totally dismisses the FSA.
For months everybody knows that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) of al-Qaeda-linked Abdul Hakim Belhaj has been active in Syria -- as well as remnants of al-Qaeda in Iraq now responsible for car bombings even in Damascus.
In the event of a post-Assad Syria dominated by hardcore Sunnis infiltrated by Wahhabis and Salafi-jihadists, guaranteed blowback will leave Afghanistan after the 1980s anti-Soviet jihad looking like a ride on Disneyland Hong Kong.
We accept yuan and rubles