Meals On Wheels? Sorry, ma'am, we have no proof it .works..
(Image by seniorconcerns.org) Details DMCA
By Bob Gaydos
I think I have the White House game plan figured out. Actually, there are two of them. Make that three:
- The NIC (narcissist-in-chief) thrives on chaos. He will keep as many balls in the air -- as many ridiculous charges, outrageous statements and out-and-out lies -- as possible to keep everyone's eyes off his efforts to milk the presidency for as much money as possible for his and his family's business interests. It's always about the buck with the Donald. The fact that he also happens to be an ignorant, racist, misogynist, bully only helps to camouflage his motivation: Greed.
- The Republican Party, which controls Congress, wants to use the NIC as a smokescreen for the fact it has no idea how to actually govern and really wants to only do what it always wants to do -- reduce taxes for the rich and reward its corporate contributors, for as long as it can manage to keep the NIC in office.
- The Destroy-the-Government Gang. As its name implies, this is the really dangerous one, a combination of Steve Bannon followers and Tea Party fanatics who have grabbed the Republican Party by the throat and said, "Listen up, we're in charge now." It combines dumb and venal, a deadly combination which also exists in game plan Number 2. Plus, it throws in just plain rotten.
Since all three are working together for separate goals, they share a mutual interest in fomenting chaos. The media have to decide daily what to focus on: The Russians? The wiretaps? The Wall? The travel ban? The budget? The conflicts of interest? The Trump/Ryan health care plan?
The only way for the rest of us to maintain sanity is to take it in digestible pieces. or, as is the case here, indigestible pieces. I offer two examples from the past week of what I think are the dumb and venal thinking that drive Republican policy today. One involves the budget, the other health care.
First, the budget. Mike Mulvaney, the NIC's budget director, in defending his boss's (Bannon's) proposed 2017 budget, which mercilessly slashes social spending to further beef up the most powerful military on the planet and close the nation's borders, defended the elimination of federal funds for the Meals on Wheels program because it "doesn't work."
He said it was "compassionate" to eliminate funds to feed homebound, low-income senior citizens because it wasn't fair to ask single mothers to pay for something for which there was no proof of success. He also said the same thing about free school lunches and after-school programs for poor children.
This is dumb on steroids because, as reported in The Washington Post, numerous studies show that Meals-on-Wheels programs that feed more than a million homebound seniors every week "significantly improve diet quality, increase nutrient intakes, and reduce food insecurity and nutritional risk among participants. Other beneficial outcomes include increased socialization opportunities, improvement in dietary adherence, and higher quality of life." It also reduces costs involved with taking care of the elderly in costly nursing homes.
Plus, what kind of country doesn't want to fund programs that allow volunteers to bring meals to senior citizens with limited income or to feed hungry kids? That's just rotten.
For the record, Mulvaney is a Tea Party loyalist. His nomination by the NIC was approved by the Senate, 51-49, with Republican John McCain joining all 48 Democrats in voting no. McCain said his vote was based on Mulvaney's previous votes to cut defense spending. Interesting, now that he's the NIC's budget chief and not just another congressman, Mulvaney is OK with pumping up a bloated military budget by adding $54 billion, even if it means poor kids and older citizens go without food. Dumb, venal and rotten personified.
Now, health care. The GOP plan has been almost universally described as a disaster. We'll save that for a later time. But if you're looking for the kind of genius that went into writing it, let's look at an exchange that took place in the House of Representatives in the middle of the night.
As the Energy and Commerce committee discussed the bill, Rep. Michael Doyle (D-Pa.) asked Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) what he meant when he said premiums were "skyrocketing" in his state "because of the mandates from Obamacare." What was he talking about, Doyle wondered. What did he object to? "Certainly not " pre-existing conditions, or caps on benefits or letting your child stay on the policy until 26, so I'm curious what is it we're mandating?"
"What about men having to purchase prenatal care?" spoke up Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.). "Is that not correct? And should they?"
"There's no such thing as a la carte insurance, John," Doyle replied.
"That's the point," Shimkus answered. "We want the consumer to be able to go to the insurance market and be able to negotiate on a plan."
"There's not a single insurance company in the world that does that," said Doyle. "You're talking about something that doesn't exist.''
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).