Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/3/20

The DNC's Move to Accommodate Bloomberg Stirs Outrage in Iowa

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   5 comments
Author 29155
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Nichols
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

From The Nation

Candidates, members of Congress, and activists are outraged over debate rule changes that bow to a billionaire.

Michael Bloomberg
Michael Bloomberg
(Image by Gage Skidmore)
  Details   DMCA

Grinnell, Iowa -- Michael Moore could barely contain his fury.

After the Democratic National Committee signaled Friday that it would abandon a grassroots-funding requirement that ensured candidates had to prove their appeal by attracting tens of thousands of small donations, Moore told a crowd of 2,500 that had packed into a cavernous concert hall near Des Moines, "You had to show you had a certain number of Americans that would give you a buck, that's all the rule said, to show you have support. And that's how they determine who would be on the debate stage. Today they removed that rule because [of] Mike Bloomberg, the billionaire, the Republican Mayor of New York City."

As Moore described the rule change, his rage was echoed by the crowd, which booed the DNC and cheered the filmmaker's stark assessment of the party's motivation.

"He doesn't have to show he has any support among the American people, he can just buy his way onto the debate stage, and I'm going to tell you what's so disgusting about this.

"I watched the debate in Iowa here two weeks ago -- the all-white debate -- and the fact [is] that the Democratic, the DNC will not allow Cory Booker on that stage, will not allow Julian Castro on that stage, but they are going to allow Mike Bloomberg on the stage? Because he has a billion f*cking dollars!"

A roar of progressive populist outrage shook the venue.

Moore's been an enthusiastic surrogate for Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in Iowa, where Monday's caucuses officially launch the race for delegates to nominate the party's 2020 candidate. Since the news broke Friday, there has been widespread objection to the rule changes, which will allow candidates to gain a place on the stage of the February 19 debate in Nevada by registering at least 10 percent support in four qualifying national, Nevada, or South Carolina polls -- or 12 percent in a pair of qualifying polls from the two states. They can also qualify if they win convention delegates with a good finish in Monday's Iowa caucuses or the February 11 New Hampshire primary.

But the requirement that candidates show an ability to raise significant amounts of money from small donors which DNC chair Tom Perez once defended by saying, "You can't win the presidency in the modern era if you can't build relationships with the grassroots" -- are being scrapped.

The DNC now says it has better measures, in the form of polls and caucus and primary results. But Bloomberg has declined to campaign in Iowa and other states where the process begins. Instead, he is spending heavily -- almost $200 million by the end of 2019 and much more since then -- on a national advertising campaign (including a $10 million Super Bowl ad) that aims at upping his poll numbers in time for later contests in delegate-rich states. Bloomberg's numbers are rising, and there is mounting speculation that with the rule change he will make it into the Nevada debate.

No one wants to exclude Bloomberg from the debates. In fact, there has been real concern about the lack of scrutiny faced by the wealthiest candidate. While other contenders have been required to prove themselves as policy-makers, fundraisers, and grassroots campaigners, Bloomberg has been able to surf a free-spending broadcast, cable, and digital media campaign into contention.

There are plenty of Democrats who want to see whether Bloomberg can manage on a debate stage -- and plenty who suggest he would have a hard time holding his own in fall debates with Republican Donald Trump, who has already begun to refer to Bloomberg as "Mini Mike." But there is anger at the prospect that Bloomberg could get on the debate stage without playing by the rules that others -- including another wealthy self-funding candidate, Tom Steyer -- struggled to follow.

"The DNC didn't change the rules to ensure good, diverse candidates could remain on the debate stage," declared Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, who like Sanders has been a stark critic of the influence of big money on politics. "They shouldn't change the rules to let a billionaire on. Billionaires shouldn't be allowed to play by different rules -- on the debate stage, in our democracy, or in our government."

Former housing secretary Julia'n Castro, a candidate who dropped out and is now backing Warren, noted, "When [New Jersey Senator] Cory Booker led an effort to change the debate thresholds, the DNC refused -- saying they couldn't benefit any candidate. It seems the only candidate they're willing to benefit is a billionaire who's buying his way into the race. Total mess."

In a race that began with the most diverse field in American history, candidates who embodied that diversity, including Castro and Booker, have now left the competition -- leading to complaints that debate rules were creating an "all-white" competition. But the DNC has refused to bend in the face of demands for a loosening of the rules -- or to calls by grassroots groups for issue-focused debates on the climate crisis and poverty.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

John Nichols Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written the Online Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Paul Ryan? Seriously?

Scott Walker's Austerity Agenda Yields 'Worst Job Losses in US'

What the Hell Is Wrong With Paul Ryan?

The Koch Brothers, ALEC and the Savage Assault on Democracy

GM's Plant Closures Confirm the President is a Liar and a Fool

The Deafening Silence of the Republican Field in the Wake of the Planned Parenthood Shooting

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments


shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282
(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 25 fans, 66 articles, 18 quicklinks, 3491 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Ho...Ho...Ho. They can see us when we are sleeping, which is all of the time apparently. They know when we are awake...really? Perverts. Are we awake? Perhaps wakening? Nyet. Not yet.


Submitted on Monday, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:23:52 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

Stephen Fox

Become a Fan
Author 4578
(Member since Jan 21, 2007), 32 fans, 492 articles, 933 quicklinks, 3631 comments, 14 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to shad williams:   New Content
Great article, eh?


Bloomberg couldn't do it the hard way, because he was probably still deciding with lots of money he gets to turn corners and do it the easy way.


I will say one thing for him: when we had the tax on soda election last year to pay for 1000 preschool Santa Fe to have a PreK course totalling $8 Million, Bloomberg donated $1 million to get that done. The voters voted it down, but at least his heart was in the right place.


Strange effects will soon come in the backfiring of this plan. No one will abandon Bernie, no more than .5% if that, and he will just end up fracturing the rest of the vote, probably taking away fron Biden more than anyone. What do you thinK?


Bernie Rally: Michael Moore Slams DNC Rule Change That Allows Bloomberg to Dem Debate | NowThis 'They're gonna let Mike Bloomberg on the stage 'cause he's got a billion f*cking dollars!' -- Listen to Michael Moore slam the DNC for changing the debate rule
(Image by YouTube, Channel: NowThis News)
Details DMCA

Submitted on Monday, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:06:10 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jan 22, 2008), 40 fans, 71 articles, 569 quicklinks, 6218 comments, 48 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Let's be aware that Bloomberg has donated $300,000,000 to the DNC and another $800,000,000 to the Democrat Grassroots program. While that isn't illegal it certainly shows how the "system" the Democrats want to keep and they will use anything they can, legal or illegal, unethical, undemocratic.

Also, be reminded that Bloomberg endorsed Bush for his 2nd term. How much of a "Democrat" is he? Or doesn't that matter nowadays?

Submitted on Monday, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:01:01 PM

  Recommend  (3+)
Help
Indent

lila york

Become a Fan
Author 11671
(Member since Feb 18, 2008), 99 fans, 74 articles, 133 quicklinks, 2889 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Dennis Kaiser:   New Content

correct. It doesn't matter to the duopoly war party machine.

Submitted on Tuesday, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:36:50 AM

  Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jan 22, 2008), 40 fans, 71 articles, 569 quicklinks, 6218 comments, 48 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Dennis Kaiser:   New Content

OOPS. KINDA WENT CRAZY WITH THE 000s. JUST TAKE 3 OFF EACH FIGURE.

Submitted on Tuesday, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:24:48 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help