Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 14 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 8/21/19

Talk of Moving UK's Embassy in Israel

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment

From Consortium News

Brexit could open the way for a U.K. embassy in Jerusalem.
Brexit could open the way for a U.K. embassy in Jerusalem.
(Image by (Christoph Scholz, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons))
  Details   DMCA

Following U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton's talks with Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his ministers in London last week, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office has been asked to speed up contingency planning for the U.K. to move its embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, with an eye to an "early announcement" post Brexit.

The U.K. is currently bound by an EU common foreign policy position not to follow the United States in moving its embassy to Jerusalem. As things stand, that prohibition will fall on Nov. 1. FCO officials had previously been asked to produce a contingency plan, but this involved the construction of a £14 million new embassy and a four-year timescale. They have now been asked to go back and look at a quick fix involving moving the ambassador and immediate staff to Jerusalem and renaming the consulate already there as the embassy. This could be speedily announced, and then implemented in about a year.

U.K. embassy  in Tel Aviv.
U.K. embassy in Tel Aviv.
(Image by (I, Aviad2001, CC BY 2.5, Wikimedia Commons))
  Details   DMCA

Johnson heads the most radically pro-Israel cabinet in U.K. history and the symbolic gesture of rejection of Palestinian rights is naturally appealing to his major ministers: Home Secretary

Priti Patel, Chancellor Sajid Javid, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab. They also see three other political benefits.

Three Benefits Seen

Firstly, they anticipate that Labour opposition to the move can be used to yet again raise accusations of "anti-Semitism" against Jeremy Corbyn, the opposition leader.

Secondly, it provides good "red meat" to Brexiteer support in marking a clear and, they believe, popular break from EU foreign policy, at no economic cost.

Thirdly, it seals the special link between the Trump and Johnson administrations and sets the U.K. apart from other NATO allies.

Bolton also discussed the possibility of U.K. support for Israeli annexation of areas of the West Bank to "solve" the illegality of Israeli settlements on occupied territory. My FCO sources believe this is going to be much more difficult politically for the cabinet to agree than simply moving the embassy, due to lack of support on their own backbenches.

This is an insight into the future of British foreign policy if the Johnson government, and the U.K., both survive. In the massive defeat of the U.K. at the UN General Assembly two months ago over the illegal occupation of the Chagos Islands, the U.K. was in a voting bloc with only the U.S., Israel, Australia, Hungary and the Maldives, against the rest of the world. The Maldives had a particular maritime interest there, but the leadership of the others -- Donald Trump, Viktor Orban, Scott Morrison, Benjamin Netanyahu and now Boris Johnson -- constitute a distinct and extreme right-wing bloc. These are very worrying times indeed.

This article is from the author's blog site, CraigMurray.org.uk.

 

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Craig Murray Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Craig Murray is an author, broadcaster and human rights activist. He was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004 and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010.


Longer bio (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA's Absence of Conviction

Talk of Moving UK's Embassy in Israel

Condemned By Their Own Words

The Real Mueller-gate Scandal

Scotland Has Only One Move to React to Boris Johnson's Maneuvers

New Westminster Cabinet Far to the Right of Thatcher's

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282

(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 23 fans, 60 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2695 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

It seems to me that the Brits are the running dog lackeys of the US hegemon, a lot more so than when they fucked up their Suez operation. And they keep screwing up. A botched Skrypal operation, the White Helmut fake chemical attack in Douma fiasco, taking an Iranian oil ship, losing it, issuing a warrant to take it again using an effective warrant date 90 days later... but the elites are holding them close just the same. I guess the Russia Did It Op worked out okay after all.

Could a ruffled Boris could look any more subservient than he did next to John Robert Bolton as the US National Security Advisor promised that the UK will be first in line in the next round of trade deals? When did the NatSec get a public role in trade policy? I am sure the two crooks leading Commerce and Treasury can't be too keen about that.

Submitted on Thursday, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:55:23 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment