Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 11/30/21

Should Donald Trump's Persona be Taken at Face Value?

Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 506833
Message Dom Filanowski

[This is a supplementary article. For a greater understanding of context, please read "'The Science' is not Exactly Science" click here click here]

The Covid-19 pandemic is probably the only event in recorded history that became politicized before it was even known to have been eventful. Donald Trump's rhetoric, downplaying the WHO messaging and the severity of the novel coronavirus set the wheels in motion for the polarization that has plagued this event ever since. As a result, very few people are open to ideas that do not confirm their bias, a quality that is essential to critical thinking. Trump's "anti-establishment" persona has enabled the United States government to continue on its path of authoritarianism with much less resistance from the community than one might expect.

In addition to the radical mitigation strategies that were utilized for a pandemic with a relatively low magnitude of mortality [click here], the Trump administration and even the president himself have taken direct actions that are oddly in line with the so-called establishment. There is also a considerable amount of circumstantial evidence to question his nonconformist identity.

Donald Trump owes much of his political success to the Clinton campaign and the media, both of whom elevated Trump. In the trove of emails that were published by WikiLeaks in 2016, it was revealed that Trump was elevated as a "pied piper" candidate, which was supposed to help Hillary Clinton win the election [click here]. In 2015, Jeb Bush sarcastically tweeted a similar sentiment that proved to be wrong ["Jeb Bush tweets Trump-Clinton conspiracy theory. Here's a look at the 'evidence.'" click here]. The 2016 Alfred E Smith Dinner hot mic moment quickly vanished into obscurity. Trump and Clinton were caught praising each other and planning on working together after the election, in private, after sparring more harshly than a typical presidential race, in front of the camera. "Now, you notice there is no teleprompter here tonight, which is probably smart, because maybe you saw Donald dismantle his prompter the other day," Clinton said [click here], "And I get that. They're hard to keep up with, and I'm sure it's even harder when you're translating from the original Russian." This comment was a thinly veiled implication of treason. Trump was actually booed several times for his comments that evening.

In February 2017, shortly after Donald Trump was sworn into office, it was reported how he had already signed a dozen executive orders, and one of them gave the FBI access to NSA mass surveillance data. This unwarranted data collection of the telephone records, emails, and web-browsing history of US citizens, which was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden, in 2013, was later ruled unlawful in 2020 [.bbc.com/news/technology-54013527]. In absence of a search warrant and/or probable cause, the mass surveillance was also in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Executive Order 13773 was signed on February 9th, 2017. The order states:

...Sec. 2. Policy. It shall be the policy of the executive branch to:

...(c) maximize the extent to which all Federal agencies share information and coordinate with Federal law enforcement agencies, as permitted by law, in order to identify, interdict, and dismantle transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;

...(d) enhance cooperation with foreign counterparts against transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including, where appropriate and permitted by law, through sharing of intelligence and law enforcement information and through increased security sector assistance to foreign partners by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security;

While its stated goal was to crack down on threats like organized crime and human trafficking, these emotional ploys conceal the executive order's potential for abuse. Such authority often finds a way of going beyond its original intended scope, as was the case of J Edgar Hoover's COINTELPRO. Hoover collected files of damaging personal information and utilized blackmail to amass power.

The FBI's Counterintelligence Program, which was eerily similar to the Patriot Act [.aclu.org/other/more-about-fbi-spying], used extreme measures, many of which were illegal, to neutralize political dissidents and "subversive" groups in the name of "national security." Some of the covert tactics that were allegedly utilized by COINTELPRO include the infiltration of groups with informants, illegal wiretapping, forging documents, opening letters, planting false reports in the media, burglary, inciting violence, psychological warfare, and assassination. The Counterintelligence Program's reign of terror came to an end after members of an activist group (Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI) broke into an FBI field office and stole several dossiers before disseminating the information to numerous media outlets. The intelligence community of the information age has the same lack of accountability but with superior technology.

A few months ago, Yahoo! News published an investigative report that was hailed as a "bombshell" [click here]. Several mainstream sources made reference to the report which was based on interviews with more than 30 former US intelligence and security officials [click here click here click here]. According to the report, senior CIA officials under the Trump Administration allegedly targeted Julian Assange, the former editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, with an unprecedented campaign of covert operations. Some of the more sinister aspects of this campaign included proposals to kidnap or even assassinate Assange who was then quartered at the Embassy of Ecuador in London. Supposedly, Mike Pompeo, the former Director of the CIA, had a grudge with WikiLeaks over the "Vault 7" release, which exposed the capabilities of certain CIA hacking tools, and this is what fueled the campaign against Assange.

The WikiLeaks founder sought diplomatic asylum in the embassy after the British courts ruled he should be extradited to Sweden where he was accused of raping two women, allegations which he has denied. Assange's claim that he had requested asylum out of fear that he would eventually be extradited to the United States was widely ridiculed by mainstream media outlets at the time. In addition to the Justice Department's recent appeal for the extradition of Assange [click here], the assertions of the "bombshell" report more than vindicate his concern. Additionally, in 2016, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), a UN panel of human rights experts, declared that Julian Assange had been arbitrarily detained by Sweden and the UK, that he should be compensated for his detainment, and that Assange was "entitled to his freedom of movement" [click here].

No charges were ever filed against Assange in regard to the rape allegations in Sweden, and it is no fault of the accused that the Swedish government dragged its feet with the interview process. Likewise, the lack of sufficient evidence that existed in 2019, when the case was reopened, reflects the same lack of evidence that existed in 2010 when Sweden first filed an arrest warrant for Assange [.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11949341 click here].

Along with the more extreme plans which never materialized, the CIA campaign against Assange reportedly utilized some covert tactics that bear a striking resemblance to the actions taken by COINTELPRO. The CIA was able to conduct these "offensive counterintelligence" activities with virtually no oversite because of the way in which WikiLeaks, an unorthodox journalistic organization, was categorized as a "non-state hostile intelligence service." This allowed the CIA to perform covert operations without the authorization of a presidential "finding," the document that is usually required in addition to briefing the House and Senate intelligence committees. The term "non-state hostile intelligence service" was coined due to the lack of evidence that WikiLeaks was operating under the command of Moscow. Intelligence officials also petitioned the Trump White House (unsuccessfully) to redefine some high-profile journalists as "information brokers" to portray them as "agents of a foreign power."

Some of the alleged offensive counterintelligence activities utilized by the CIA include surveillance and disruption of numerous members and associates of WikiLeaks. The CIA gathered intel on their travels and was able to delineate their "patterns of life." The agency knew where these individuals were, who they were talking to, and what they were saying on a regular basis, along with the media platforms they used. This surveillance transitioned to disruption, the primary covert tactic used against WikiLeaks. The Yahoo! News investigative report (Kidnapping, assassination and a London shoot-out: Inside the CIA's secret war plans against WikiLeaks click here) states, "These [disruptive activities] included paralyzing its digital infrastructure, disrupting its communications, provoking internal disputes within the organization by planting damaging information, and stealing WikiLeaks members' electronic devices, according to three former officials." The Spanish security company that was hired by Ecuador to safeguard its embassy in London was compromised by US intelligence. Along with providing information about Assange's activities and the people who visited him at the embassy, the company installed hidden recording devices to spy on Assange.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Dom Filanowski Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dominic M Filanowski, II is a self-described writer-artist-activist and a cultivator of thought. He's a Philly-boy that truly knows the meaning of brotherly love. Educated in the field of graphic design, Dominic has a working knowledge of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Two Steps Back: The Yellow-Vest Response to Bad Planning

Commemorate 11-9 as a Day of Peace

Get the Shot . . .

The Unjust Condemnation of the Great Barrington Declaration

Home Run for Julian, Philadelphia: Bases Loaded

A Trump Presidency, the Path to Progressive Legislation?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: