Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Range Voting

By       Message Paul Cohen       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment, In Series: Balanced Voting

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 1890

(Image by justgrimes)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
Returning from a stay at a bed and breakfast, I email requesting that I rate the B&B. Recalling the cold bed with only one thin blanket and breakfast consisting of tepid coffee and a piece of dry toast, I clicked on the link for the survey but found just a single question. Did I enjoy my stay?

The available answers were:

      1. Yes

      2. Enjoyed very much

        - Advertisement -
      3. Thoroughly enjoyed it

      4. Perfect

      5. Outstanding

        - Advertisement -

This stands as a nice example of a positive voting system as described in an earlier article but it seems to be missing something - balance perhaps.

This story also illustrates a range voting ballot, in this case having a range consists of the five ratings listed above. To tally the votes from all the guests over time, the ratings are assigned numerical values, such as the ones shown, that are added or perhaps averaged, depending on how the results are to be used.

Like IRV, range voting allows the voter to register different degrees of approval or, in a slight variation, disapproval of candidates.

In another earlier article of this series I introduced a system of voting that I called Balanced Approval Voting and a reader correctly observed that BAV amounted to range voting with three scores in its range. Using BAV, a voter designates each candidate as one of:

      1. Disapprove

      2. Neither approve or disapprove

        - Advertisement -
      3. Approve

To tally the votes, we could use the indicated numeric values, 1, 2 and 3 or we could use the values -1, 0 and 1 as suggested in that earlier article. Whichever number assignments are used, the winner will remain the same so long as they are kept in that order and spaced evenly.

Well, actually that is not quite the case. To be certain of that claim we must specify that every voter specifies a rating for every single candidate.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

A concerned citizen and former mathematician/engineer now retired and living in rural Maine.

Paul Cohen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)
Series: "Balanced Voting"

A Voter's Quandry (Article) (# of views) 12/10/2018
Opposites (Article) (# of views) 10/20/2018
A First Experience with Ranked Voting (Article) (# of views) 06/13/2018
View All 35 Articles in "Balanced Voting"
Total Views for the Series: 30548   

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Pays Taxes?

Liberate Yourself from the Mainstream Media

Who Pays Taxes II

Rethinking Which Voting System is Best

Conservatives Without Conscience

Can Less be Better?