Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 4/20/18

Progressives Should NEVER Use Uber Or Lyft: Part 3

Author 87755
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Anthony Kalamar
Become a Fan


(Image by Creative Commons photo from Wikipedia; modified by the author.)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Not only are Uber and Lyft bad for workers, bad for cities, bad for the environment, and bad for democracy, they are a core part of the new post-truth, toxic economic and political culture that is endangering the US today.

(Click here to read the first part of this series)

(Click here to read the second part of this series)

- Advertisement -


Uber and Lyft Exemplify the New Post-Truth, Toxic Capitalism

How do you feel about this current "post-Truth" moment in our culture and politics?

- Advertisement -

Don't like the facts? Invent some "alternative facts" that support your case. Don't like the news? Then tell everyone it's just "fake news." While everyone's distracted by this, steal everything you can lay your hands on; destroy whatever gets in your way.

This isn't an exaggeration, it's just politics in the Trumpian era.

Guess what? Uber and Lyft play by the exact same playbook. And they're quite good at it, seeing as they'd been doing it for years before Trump ever got into office. In fact, through their selfish, destructive behavior, Uber and Lyft (and a few of their fellow Silicon Valley corporations) helped set the stage for the toxic, "post-truth" political culture we have today.

"Alternative facts?" They got em. And like compulsive liars, they keep piling on more and more. Uber and Lyft were key players in the birth of sharewashing--which, like greenwashing, means misrepresenting your business as more socially friendly than it really is, to avoid regulation. Again and again, Uber and Lyft have spread misinformation about themselves--claiming that they would reduce congestion, when they in fact added to it; promising to implement disabled-accessible services, which turn out to be insultingly inadequate; they lure drivers with promises of a good income, then cut rates and take more and more of each ride for themselves.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Anthony Kalamar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Anthony Kalamar is an independent scholar and writer on environmental and technology issues.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sharewashing is the New Greenwashing

Share like a Sherpa: Class Inequality in the "Sharing" Economy

Will "Ridesharing" Kill Ridesharing?

Progressives Should NEVER Use Uber Or Lyft

Progressives Should NEVER Use Uber Or Lyft: Part 3

Progressives Should NEVER Use Uber Or Lyft: Part 4