Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama, "Change in personnel, no change in policy." An opportunity gone wanting.

By       Message Dave Lefcourt     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/25/10

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

President Obama did what he needed to do yesterday, acting decisive when it counted in firing General Stanley McChrystal. The latter acted stupidly with arrogance and hubris and deserved his sacking.

After reading the story by Michael Hastings in "Rolling Stone" that cast McChrystal and his staff entourage openly discrediting and ridiculing Obama and most of his key staff advisors, it became clear the McChrystal removal was necessary.

It was hoped from this quarter that with McChrystal gone Obama would use the firing as the basis to conduct his own reevaluation of the Afghan war. But that hope was dashed almost immediately when he said, "This is a change in personnel, but it is not a change in policy," while naming General David Petraeus the new American commander replacing the discredited McChrystal. Well so much for "change you can believe in."

- Advertisement -

Petraeus, made famous for the successful "surge" strategy in Iraq (though in fact it was his co opting of the Iraqi Sunni inspired "awakening" movement and its turning against al Qaeda which Petraeus "Americanized" six months later and made it his own) will just head up and inherit the same failed policy that Obama has hitched his wagon to.

For what we have in Afghanistan is an unnecessary war fighting against an enemy (the Taliban) that never attacked us and where al Qaeda, which did attack us, is no longer located (presumed to be holed up in the Tribal areas of Pakistan). A country that has a hopelessly corrupt and quisling Hamid Karsai as its leader which the majority of Afghans do not support and have no allegiance. And in a country whose people are known to fiercely resist and successfully overcome all foreign invasions and colonial occupations whether it is the British, the Soviets and now the Americans. Our continued presence is absurd.

As we once were in Viet Nam, we are in a hopeless quagmire in Afghanistan. Changing the general in charge in Afghanistan is tantamount to changing the guard at Buckingham Palace. At least the ceremony in London is worth watching; rather meaningless but enjoyable. The ceremony anointing Petraeus as our new commander in Afghanistan was solemn and distressing. It just meant the continuation of more unnecessary death and dying for us and the Afghans.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

dglefc22733@aol.com
Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".