Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 30 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 6/3/19

Manufacturing War With Russia

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     (# of views)   5 comments
Author 28678
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Chris Hedges
Become a Fan
  (451 fans)

From Truthdig


(Image by Mr. Fish/Truthdig)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Despite the Robert Mueller report's conclusion that Donald Trump and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new Cold War with Moscow shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of NATO to Russia's borders, a move that has made billions in profits for U.S. arms manufacturers. It is used to demonize domestic critics and alternative media outlets as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the Democratic Party's betrayal of the working class and the party's subservience to corporate power. It is used to discredit de'tente between the world's two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and U.S. interventions overseas -- including in countries such as Syria and Venezuela. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a war industry and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their power and increase their profits. (70 percent of intelligence is carried out by private corporations such as Booz Allen Hamilton, which has been called the world's most profitable spy operation.)

"This began long before Trump and 'Russia-gate,'" Stephen F. Cohen said when I interviewed him for my television show, "On Contact." Cohen is professor emeritus of politics at Princeton University, where he was the director of the Russian studies program, and professor emeritus of Russian studies and history at New York University. "You have to ask yourself, why is it that Washington had no problem doing productive diplomacy with Soviet communist leaders. Remember Richard Nixon and Leonid Brezhnev? It was a love fest. They went hunting together [in the Soviet Union]. Yet along comes a post-Soviet leader, Vladimir Putin, who is not only not a communist but a professed anti-communist. Washington has been hating on him ever since 2003, 2004. It requires some explanation. Why do we like communist leaders in Russia better than we like Russia's anti-communist leader? It's a riddle."

"If you're trying to explain how the Washington establishment has dealt with Putin in a hateful and demonizing way, you have to go back to the 1990s before Putin," said Cohen, whose new book is "War With Russia? From Putin & Ukraine to Trump & Russia-gate." The first post-Soviet leader is Boris Yeltsin. Clinton is president. And they have this fake, pseudo-partnership and friendship, whereas essentially the Clinton administration took advantage of the fact that Russia was in collapse. It almost lost its sovereignty. I lived there in the '90s. Middle-class people lost their professions. Elderly people lost their pensions. I think it's correct to say that industrial production fell more in the Russian 1990s than it did during our own Great Depression. It was the worst economic and social depression ever in peacetime. It was a catastrophe for Russia."

- Advertisement -

In September 1993 Russians took to the streets to protest the collapse of the economy -- the gross domestic product had fallen by 50% and the country was convulsed by hyperinflation -- along with the rampant corruption that saw state enterprises sold for paltry fees to Russian oligarchs and foreign corporations in exchange for lavish kickbacks and bribes; food and fuel shortages; the nonpayment of wages and pensions; the lack of basic services, including medical services; falling life expectancy; the explosion of violent crime; and Yeltsin's increasing authoritarianism and his unpopular war with Chechnya.

In October 1993 Yeltsin, after dissolving the parliament, ordered army tanks to shell the Russian parliament building, which was being occupied by democratic protesters. The assault left 2,000 dead. Yet during his presidency Yeltsin was effusively praised and supported by Washington. This included U.S. support for a $10.2 billion International Monetary Fund loan to Russia during his 1996 re-election campaign. The loan enabled the Yeltsin government to pay huge sums in back wages and pensions to millions of Russians, with checks often arriving on the eve of the election. Also, an estimated $1.5 billion from the loan was used to directly fund the Yeltsin presidential campaign. But by the time Yeltsin was forced out of office in December 1999, his approval rating had sunk to 2%. Washington, losing Yeltsin, went in search of another malleable Russian leader and, at first, thought it had found one in Putin.

"Putin went to Texas," Cohen said. "He had a barbecue with Bush, second Bush. Bush said he 'looked into his eyes and saw a good soul.' There was this honeymoon. Why did they turn against Putin? He turned out not to be Yeltsin. We have a very interesting comment about this from Nicholas Kristof, the New York Times columnist, who wrote, I think in 2003, that his own disillusion with Putin was that he had turned out not to be 'a sober Yeltsin.' What Washington was hoping for was a submissive, supplicant, post-Soviet Russian leader, but one who was younger, healthier and not a drinker. They thought they had that in Putin. Yeltsin had put Putin in power, or at least the people around Yeltsin did."

- Advertisement -

"When Putin began talking about Russia's sovereignty, Russia's independent course in world affairs, they're aghast," Cohen said of the Washington elites. "This is not what they expected. Since then, my own thinking is we were pretty lucky after the 1990s to get Putin because there were worst contenders in the wings. I knew some of them. I don't want to name names. But some of these guys were really harsh people. Putin was kind of the right person for the right time, both for Russia and for Russian world affairs."

"We have had three years of this," Cohen said of Russia-gate. "We lost sight of the essence of what this allegation is. The people who created Russia-gate are literally saying, and have been for almost three years, that the president of the United States is a Russian agent, or he has been compromised by the Kremlin. We grin because it's so fantastic. But the Washington establishment, mainly the Democrats but not only, have taken this seriously."

"I don't know if there has ever been anything like this in American history," Cohen said. "That accusation does such damage to our own institutions, to the presidency, to our electoral system, to Congress, to the American mainstream media, not to mention the damage it's done to American-Russian relations, the damage it has done to the way Russians, both elite Russians and young Russians, look at America today. This whole Russia-gate has not only been fraudulent, it's been a catastrophe."

"There were three major episodes of de'tente in the 20th century," Cohen said. "The first was after Stalin died, when the Cold War was very dangerous. That was carried out by Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican president. The second was by Richard Nixon, advised by Henry Kissinger -- it was called 'the Nixon de'tente with Brezhnev.' The third, and we thought most successful, was Ronald Reagan with Mikhail Gorbachev. It was such a successful de'tente Reagan and Gorbachev, and Reagan's successor, the first Bush, said the Cold War was over forever."

"The wall had come down," Cohen said of the 1989 collapse of East Germany and the fall of the Berlin Wall. "Germany was reunifying. The question became 'where would a united Germany be?' The West wanted Germany in NATO. For Gorbachev, this was an impossible sell. Twenty-seven point five million Soviet citizens had died in the war against Germany in the Second World War on the eastern front. Contrary to the bunk we're told, the United States didn't land on Normandy and defeat Nazi Germany. The defeat of Nazi Germany was done primarily by the Soviet army. How could Gorbachev go home and say, 'Germany is reunited. Great. And it's going to be in NATO.' It was impossible. They told Gorbachev, 'We promise if you agree to a reunited Germany in NATO, NATO will not move -- this was Secretary of State James Baker -- one inch to the east. In other words, NATO would not move from Germany toward Russia. And it did."

"As we speak today, NATO is on Russia's borders," Cohen said. "From the Baltics to Ukraine to the former Soviet Republic of Georgia. So, what happened? Later, they said Gorbachev lied or he misunderstood. [That] the promise was never made. But the National Security Archive in Washington has produced all the documents of the discussion in 1990. It was not only [President George [H.W.] Bush, it was the French leader François Mitterrand, it was Margaret Thatcher of England. Every Western leader promised Gorbachev NATO would not move eastward."

- Advertisement -

"What do you end up with today?" he asked. "Betrayal. Any kind of discussion about Russian-American relations today, an informed Russian is going to say, 'We worry you will betray us again.' Putin said he had illusions about the West when he came to power."

"Trump comes out of nowhere in 2016 and says, 'I think we should cooperate with Russia,'" Cohen said. "This is a statement of de'tente. It's what drew my attention to him. It's then that this talk of Trump being an agent of the Kremlin begins. One has to wonder -- I can't prove it -- but you have to think logically. Was this [allegation] begun somewhere high up in America by people who didn't want a pro-de'tente president? And [they] thought that Trump, however small it seemed at the time that he could win -- they really didn't like this talk of cooperation with Russia. It set in motion these things we call Russia-gate."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Chris Hedges Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Chris Hedges spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas Morning News and The New York Times, for which he was a foreign correspondent for 15 years.

Hedges was part of the team of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Coming Collapse

The Radical Christian Right and the War on Government

Why the United States Is Destroying Its Education System

Rise Up or Die

This Is What Resistance Looks Like

The Most Brazen Corporate Power Grab in American History

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments


Charles Homer

Become a Fan
Author 511996

(Member since Aug 27, 2018), 1 fan, 107 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

As shown in this article, Americans have recently been warned that war is a certainty:

click here

It must be somewhat comforting to know that, given the certainty of war, the current Commander-in-Chief has the best interests of those Americans who are willing to lay their lives on the line for their homeland at heart and that the Trump Administration has taken steps to "restore the arsenal of democracy", that is, democracy "American Style".

Submitted on Monday, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:44:42 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 

lila york

Become a Fan
Author 11671

(Member since Feb 18, 2008), 99 fans, 68 articles, 105 quicklinks, 2559 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Pence, Pompeo and Bolton are all over the map screaming that the US is going to war. We, the people, need to stop these psychotics. At least call your reps and tell them to stop them. Trade wars lead to hot wars, and Trump now has trade wars in place on the world - Mexico added last week and India next. Soon the US will be isolated on the planet - economically and militarily. We are so f**ked.

Submitted on Monday, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:29:03 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
 

lila york

Become a Fan
Author 11671

(Member since Feb 18, 2008), 99 fans, 68 articles, 105 quicklinks, 2559 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I posted the video of Stephen Cohen's On Contact interview here click here


Submitted on Monday, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:55:11 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Mohammad Ala

Become a Fan
Author 8028

(Member since Oct 1, 2007), 9 fans, 18 articles, 25 quicklinks, 774 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Arms sales by Russia and Western countries have made them billions of dollars. These arms in the hands of dictators such as Saddam Hussein of Iraq and crazy Saudi Arabia rulers have brought misery to the region.

Many people have been killed especially elderly and children. Who has given the right to Russia and Western countries to drop bombs on people?

Nowadays, the rule of force has replaced the rule of law especially by countries that have nuclear bombs. These countries are not abiding by international laws and orders.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:49:47 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

John Lawrence Ré

Become a Fan
Author 78374

(Member since Apr 17, 2012), 20 fans, 2 articles, 1220 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

The burning question for the Strangeloves running the MIC-NATO war machine is whether they cross the thin green net-profit line from cold war to war. Earth's future may hang on their decision.

But in either case Russia demonization provides a pretext for more than just war profiteering" it allows the security state to consolidate its control over american culture and the zeitgeist of the 2020 tipping point elections.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:18:34 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment