Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 11/28/18

Mandatory Minimums a Monstrous Miscarriage of Justice

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   4 comments
Author 509684
Message Dana Bruce Thibault

(Image by JobsForFelonsHub)   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Mandatory-minimum sentences are designed to prevent high-level offenders from getting off easy with good lawyers. Instead they often make it easier for the bad guys to avoid hard time while crucifying the least culpable and the innocent. How can this monstrous miscarriage of justice be?

Instead of forcing judges to impose stiffer sentences, mandatory minimums have almost completely taken juries and judges out of the justice process. In the hands of ambitious prosecutors who want the highest body count in the shortest time, mandatory minimums quickly became a cudgel to browbeat defendants into taking a plea agreement and turning in as many other people as possible. For 97 out of every 100 people charged, their constitutional right to a trial by jury and sentencing by an experienced and considerate judge is denied them and replaced with a prosecutor whose motivation is racking up numbers to feed the prison industry.

Here's how it works in the federal system. A drug user/dealer is arrested and charged, facing a long mandatory-minimum sentence. If he fights the case with a jury trial, he faces only a one in twelve chance of success. Juries and judges are blindered, prevented from hearing personal history, character witnesses, extenuating circumstances, or anything other than the essential, mechanical facts of the charge. Did he possess the substance? Did he sell it? It is made clear to the defendant that he has virtually no hope of winning in court. The pressure to plea is extreme, and includes the very real threat of sentencing enhancement if a plea is refused. The defendant has little choice other than negotiating a plea agreement with the prosecutor.

Now the body-count game begins. If the defendant wants any reduction in sentence, he must name names. The public, well versed in fantasy police and court procedure on TV, believes the prosecutor will work his way up the ladder to catch the bigger fish. That happens, but it is a difficult journey, met with increasing resistance and fear of retaliation the higher one goes, subject to a law of diminishing returns. And the top of the ladder is rarely reached due to rampant corruption. Why struggle to catch one big fish when you can catch three or four lesser fish in a system that counts all fish equal?

- Advertisement -
Consequently, as much and often more effort is expended in going laterally or down the ladder. "Tell me everyone you know who uses drugs" is a common opener. When a dealer does turn in his source, that person usually faces an even longer mandatory sentence, resulting in even more cooperation. Downstream, however, lesser users and participants, often facing the same penalty as their dealer, feel unfairly charged and are more likely to insist on a trial. All too often, a chain of drug busts results in a grotesque inversion of justice, where the top players get the least time while the small fry get stuck with the lengthy mandatory minimums.

And thanks to massive, enthusiastic misapplication of the organized-crime RICO statutes, anyone else who was in the room or even knew about the transaction can be charged with the same crime in the form of conspiracy. An otherwise uninvolved girlfriend who happens to be in the house or takes a phone message can be charged with the entire chain of crimes of all players as co-conspirator. Facing ten or twenty years with no one left to "cooperate" on, she is most likely to take it to court, naively believing in the justice system to find her innocent. The for-profit prisons house many of these relative innocents doing hard, long time while the top criminals that mandatory minimums were designed to punish are often out free, maybe wearing a wire and sometimes getting paid big bucks to turn in more bodies for the count.

The "FIRST STEP" act currently in the Senate is a mostly cosmetic attempt at justice reform that only slightly reduces mandatory minimums and gives inmates a chance to earn a little more good time off, but does nothing to correct the monstrous miscarriage of justice that mandatory minimums create by putting all the power of jury and judge in the hands of prosecutors with virtually no accountability.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Dana Bruce Thibault Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A Lover of Truth in a dying world of Lies.

Former Air Traffic Controller, mortgage broker, director of The Sophia Institute and felon for growing marijuana; lifelong student of the sciences, hidden truths and conspiracy facts. Favorite (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Last Time We Let an Immoral Degenerate Onto the Supreme Court We Got Citizens United

House Republicans Condemn Thousands of Children to Cruel Death

God Blesses Houston

Khashoggi was not Strangled

Isreali Attacks on US Democracy Dwarfs Russia's

Weisselberg Immunity Could Explode the Entire Hive of Trump Crime