Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 7/17/17

Keith Ellison Just Beat Back a Right-Wing Assault on Religious Freedom

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   1 comment
Author 29155
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Nichols
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

From The Nation

The congressman objected to a proposal that would have unjustly targeted Muslims.

Rep. Keith Ellison
Rep. Keith Ellison
(Image by Center for American Progress Action Fund)
  Details   DMCA

Can Democrats defend the most basic premises of the Bill of Rights in a Republican-controlled House that is run by hyper-partisan Speaker Paul Ryan and that, at Ryan's direction, so frequently dances to the authoritarian tune of a Trump administration that disrespects and disregards the Constitution?

Yes, they can. Congressman Keith Ellison just prevailed in a high-stakes struggle to defend freedom of religion as it is outlined in the First Amendment, and as it has been understood since Thomas Jefferson explained it in his final letter to the Danbury, Connecticut, Baptists: "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State."

One of the most right-wing members of the House, Arizona Republican Trent Franks, proposed an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would, in fact, have made a law respecting an establishment of religion. Franks, a staunch defender of President Trump's executive orders restricting travel by Muslims, sought to require Secretary of Defense James Mattis to "conduct two concurrent strategic assessments of the use of violent or unorthodox Islamic religious doctrine to support extremist or terrorist messaging and justification."

The amendment targeted only Islam and was so vague in its referencing of "unorthodox Islamic religious doctrine" that it invited abuse. The amendment also mandated that one of the two reviews be conducted by "non-governmental experts from academia, industry, or other entities not currently a part of the United States Government" -- opening up the process to further abuse.

Click Here to Read Whole Article