Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 5/3/20

Judging the Credibility of Joe Biden's Accuser

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   1 comment
In judging the credibility of the accuser alleging a sexual assault against former vice president Biden the standard should not be "just because she says it, it is true." Actually the standard is an objective one that is not a mystery. Every day juries are tasked with the burden of judging witness credibility. How do people cast in the role of triers of fact do that?

Here are a couple of examples how the law views this subject.

Congress has passed a law that describes how credibility ought to be determined. 8 U.S.C. ┬ž 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii) is the statute that sets out this test. It is used for judges hearing immigration cases dealing with asylum. I've edited it to take out unnecessary verbiage.

"Considering the totality of the circumstances, and all relevant factors, a trier of fact may base a credibility determination on the demeanor, candor, or responsiveness of the " witness, the inherent plausibility of the " witness's account, the consistency between the " witness's written and oral statements, " the internal consistency of each such statement, the consistency of such statements with other evidence of record " and any inaccuracies or falsehoods in such statements ""

In U.S. v. Foster, 9 F.R.D. 367, 388 (S.D. N.Y. 1949) the jury was instructed:

"This judging of testimony is very like what goes on in real life. People may tell you things which may or may not influence some important decisions on your part. You consider whether the people you deal with had the capacity and the opportunity to observe or be familiar with and to remember the things they tell you about. You consider any possible interest they may have, and any bias or prejudice. You consider a person's demeanor, to use a colloquial expression, you "size him up" when he tells you anything; you decide whether he strikes you as fair and candid or not. Then you consider the inherent believability of what he says, whether it accords with your own knowledge or experience. It is the same thing with witnesses. You ask yourself if they know what they are talking about. You watch them on the stand as they testify and note their demeanor. You decide how their testimony strikes you."

Compare these tests with a recent article. https://medium.com/@eddiekrassenstein/evidence-casts-doubt-on-tara-reades-sexual-assault-allegations-of-joe-biden-e4cb3ee38460

Two takeaways from this article and other news reports that contain similar information, it is significant that Ms. Reade was a sexual assault victim advocate and if her current story is to be believed, she waterdowned her allegations in the beginning when she joined seven women who complained only about space boundaries not being observed by the former vice-president and she was a big advocate of Putin and Russia posting and deleting texts praising them.

The graphic description she now offers would be something she could easily have learned about from her clients in her role as an advocate. Why did she water it down? Her fondness for Russia and Putin would support a conclusion that she had a motive to lie about this alleged incident. Judging her credibility, what does she have to gain by bringing a graphic charge that can't be disproved and can only be explosive to the election? These two factors raise questions about her credibility. It begs the question, does she strike you as "fair and candid or not?"

 

Rate It | View Ratings

David Tiffany Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in



BACKGROUND

Experienced civil litigation attorney: Admiralty law; employment law [discrimination]; construction defect litigation; personal injury and wrongful death litigation; business litigation in both State and Federal (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Affordable Health Care, a Constitutional and Practical Approach to the Problem

President Trump and the Iranian Pirates

Limits on the President's Pardon Power

Sexual Preference is Covered By Title VII; The Decision is Not a Stretch

The Manafort Dilemma

Judging the Credibility of Joe Biden's Accuser

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: