Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Is There a War on Christianity or is it on Evangelizing?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert De Filippis       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   67 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 5/4/13

Author 86186
Become a Fan
  (29 fans)

From IMGP9445
(Image by mattbuck4950)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
br />IMGP9445 by mattbuck4950

Two Republican Congressmen fell for another Fox story. From   "Congressmen Scalise and Gohmert Fall for Debunked Fox News Story on Supposed Plan to Court Martial Christians."

I have to admit, I wish I had done a bit more investigation before commenting on an online post on this topic. But my comment stimulated an interesting interchange that raised my awareness on one of my favorite topics.

My interchange was with two sincere evangelical Christians. During the interchanges I formed two opinions: 1. The so-called war on Christianity, or culture war if you prefer, may really be a war on Christian evangelizing. 2. Usually, it only takes a couple of interactions with certain Christians, to be hit with the knockout question, "are you disputing God's word?"

- Advertisement -

This kind of interchange is a fascinating process as long as you don't think you're going to change anyone's minds. Because why would someone who knows the word of God even consider changing his or her mind? I wouldn't. But then, I'm an agnostic, so mind changing doesn't count.

I know it doesn't count because I was reminded by a Fundamentalist Minister's claim of my religion, Unitarian Universalism, "there's no there, there." Sounds like music to this agnostic's ears, even though it's not true.

But when you believe you have the truth on God's existence and nature, you can't possibly understand how an agnostic can find peace and contentment living without your certainty.

- Advertisement -

But I digress. Getting back to evangelizing. I made the mistake of saying I believe to have religion or no religion is personal. Big mistake. I forgot the Christian evangelist's commitment to convince everyone else of their point of view.

I will give them credit for their intention, even though I think its misguided. They believe they have been commanded to go out and evangelize the good news because only true Christians will be saved; true being those who claim Jesus as their personal savior. So self-serving as it may be, to them, it's a good thing to do.

There's also the fervor that I often encounter with evangelizing Christians. It reminds me of the fervor that drove our imperialism and inspired the spirit of manifest destiny while we conquered and eliminated whole nations of people, destroyed their cultures and took their lands.

It must be driven by the same good intentions to save people for Christ. Christians have been doing it for a long time. You know, destroying people to save them when they burned them at the stake, coerced them to reject their own religions and convert or die, be so supportive of Israel because in the end, the Jews there will be converted to Christ.  

So is there really a war on Christians or a war on Christian's evangelizing? I vote for the latter.

Back to the word of God. There are several Bibles, not to mention other ancient texts like the Nag Hammadi Scriptures, Dead Sea Scrolls, etc. Which one is actually the word of God? Of course to a literalist, it must be the one they read. But it only takes a horizontal reading of the key events in the New Testament to find numerous irreconcilable differences in the "facts".

- Advertisement -

None of this seems to influence the Christian evangelist literalist who believes every word is inspired by God.

To me, religions were formed from a set of propositions that attempted to explain a lot of what they didn't understand when they were formed. And for us Earthlings, propositions can never really be proven beyond a doubt. The best we can seem to do, even in science, is to find the one with the preponderance of evidence. And using the Bible or its derivatives as evidence to prove the truth of the Bible makes me dizzy.

I think your decision to believe or disbelieve is a very personal thing. So I must respect the evangelizing Fundamentalist Christian who sincerely believes in his or her own way.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Author, columnist, and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I've authored and published seven books: "You, Your Self and the 21st Century,"The Flowers Are Talking to Me," and "Faith (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth