Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts    H2'ed 7/18/21

Interview with a Professor of Philosophy: Is Nietzsche Still Peachy?

Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 517692
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Hawkins
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

Nietzsche Street Art
Nietzsche Street Art
(Image by @markheybo)
  Details   DMCA

Interview with a Professor of Philosophy: Is Nietzsche Still Peachy?

by John Kendall Hawkins


Dear Dr. L-

I would like to interview you and ask some questions about your new book, Moral Psychology with Nietzsche"


I'm at GMT+7 but I'm flexible for a time. We can Zoom or I can send questions with follow-up. Spontaneity versus polish. Same questions.


Thanks for your interest. Where would the interview appear?

BL


Probably C-

J


OK. Send me the questions, I'll try to get you responses, but it's quite hectic for me right now.

BL


Okay, Dr. L,

Here are my 10 Questions. Batter up!

TEN QUESTIONS FOR DR LEITER ON MORAL PSYCHOLOGY WITH NIETZSCHE


1. Throughout his work, but especially in The Gay Science, Nietzsche focuses on the death of God. How did he mean that then, and how does it apply now? Was postmodernism a cause or effect of the death of God?


2. In contrast, Voltaire famously said that if God did not exist we would find it necessary to invent Him. Can you speak to that invention? Will we need to re-invent God?


3. Nietzsche once described man as being on a tightrope between beasts and the Overman. Does he ever reach the ubermensch or does he backslide? How do we tell?


4. "Consciousness is the last and latest development of the organic and hence also what is most unfinished and unstrong. Consciousness gives rise to countless errors that lead an animal Or man to perish sooner than necessary, "exceeding destiny," as Homer puts it. If the conserving association of the instincts were not so very much more powerful. and if it did not serve on the whole as a regulator. humanity would have to perish of its misjudgements and its fantasies with open eyes, of its lack of thoroughness and its credulity-in short, of

its consciousness; rather, without the former, humanity would long have disappeared." Kaufmann, The Gay Science, 11.


Nietzsche here compares instinct to consciousness, clearly honoring the integrity of the former and distrusting, seemingly, the misleading nature of consciousness. And yet, today, we seem to have reversed this polarity and look for profundity and meaning in consciousness. Indeed, your new book Moral Psychology with Nietzsche, seems to speak to this reversal. Is this true?


5. The notion of a moral psychology seems almost quaint today, and yet, paradoxically, just the kind of thinking we need. It seems like we've become transactional and relativized, with lots of gray areas that mire us down. How does one justify a moral psychology anymore? And where does Nietzsche fit into that thinking?


6. Some academics see William James as the last great American philosopher engaged in moral psychology; his work was specific to our experiences as a culture. And, going another way, I recall that Nietzsche once said that the only 'psychologist' he'd ever learned anything from was Dostoyevsky. I can see that. Nietzsche was very much the Underground Man. Somehow, this all makes me think of the 75 year hostile engagement Americans have had with Russians. Is there something we glean, some political or psychological insight we can glean from a refreshed study of these two 'psychologists'?


7. An interesting chapter in your new book comes at the end when you compare the moral psychology of Aristotle, Kant and Nietzsche. These are three major, well-studied views of moral psychology, as you point out. Each view is troubling in its own way, the former two perhaps seen anachronistic or inappropriate in our postmodern age, but, surely, Nietzsche's inherited traits model would trouble people the most -- despite, paradoxically, the fact that we live in a designer baby paradigm now (I'm thinking of the Chinese doctor who recently cloned humans and 'accidentally' enhanced their brains). Nietzsche's rejection of all previous unexamined forms and functions, his philology, helped get us here. Beyond considering whether he unintentionally aided Nazi eugenicists in his Will zu Macht, did he see this great new awakening of Man, encompassed, say, in the Singularity?


8. Following from that consideration, is the notion of 'naturalistic' Nietzschean psychology appropropriate for our age? It seems to me that one could argue either way. The far more frightening way is a vision that we are indeed at the threshold of the Ubermensch, that we have not only killed God but pulled on his moccasins for a test ride. Are we trying to find a way for machines to think like us, or are we trying to figure out a way of justifying our merge with machines as brave new beings?


9. Following that, Nietzsche, for all of his cantankerous eloquence, paints a picture of the herd versus the nobles. In a world of 7.5 billion people, and everyone wanting neoliberal democracy with smart refrigerators, where does his seemingly aristocratic posture fit in? Can he teach the masses? Or will he be forever consigned to the few and the proud? In short, who is your intended readership for Moral Psychology with Nietzsche? Is his naturalistic psychology even consistent with a democratic outlook?

10. There's a school of thought that says we've already debauched the best of Nietzsche. I don't know if we can do amor fati, or if we even want to think about eternal recurrence in age of cloning, and who doesn't want to go bunker mentality when they see pop stars incorporating "What Does Not Kill Me" into broken heart songs and N. getting the Che treatment on t-shirts? Does he have shelf life? And how would you sum up the wisdom N. brings to the table of the modern IKEA world order?

JH



Thanks, I'm not sure it would be a productive use of my time to answer these questions, which are fairly far afield of my book.

BL



(Article changed on Jul 19, 2021 at 3:30 PM EDT)

 

Rate It | View Ratings

John Hawkins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Kendall Hawkins is an American ex-pat freelance journalist and poet currently residing in Australia. His poetry, commentary, and reviews have appeared in publications in Oceania, Europe and the USA, such as Cordite, Morning Star, Hanging (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Chicago 7: Counter Cultural Learnings of America for Make Money Glorious Nation of Post-Truthvaluestan

Finding the Mother Tree: An Interview with Suzanne Simard

Sonnet: Mother's Day Poem

Dylan at 80: A Sonnet of Appreciation

Assange: "Send Him Back" to Australia

Trump's Coy Mystery: The Kiss of Death

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

No comments  Post Comment

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment