Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Hacking Dirty Government Secrets Is Not a Crime

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 66949
Message Ted Rall
Become a Fan
  (28 fans)

From Smirking Chimp

Julian Assange and the future of WikiLeaks
Julian Assange and the future of WikiLeaks
(Image by YouTube, Channel: CGTN)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

British goon cops acting at the request of the United States government entered Ecuador's embassy in London, dragged out WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and prepared to ship him across the pond. After this event last month most of the mainstream media reacted with spiteful glee about Assange's predicament and relief that the Department of Justice had exercised self-restraint in its choice of charges. "Because traditional journalistic activity does not extend to helping a source break a code to gain illicit access to a classified network, the charge appeared to be an attempt by prosecutors to sidestep the potential First Amendment minefield of treating the act of publishing information as a crime," reported a pleased The New York Times.

At the time, the feds had accused Assange of hacking conspiracy because he and Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning allegedly discussed how to break into a Pentagon computer.

Bob Garfield of NPR's "On the Media," a veteran reporter who should and probably does know better, was one of many establishmentarians who opined that we needn't worry because Assange isn't a "real" journalist.

- Advertisement -

This being the Trump Administration, self-restraint was in short supply. It turns out that the short list of Assange charges was a temporary ploy to manipulate our gullible English allies. Now Assange faces 17 additional charges under the Espionage Act and a finally-concerned Times calls it "a novel case that raises profound First Amendment issues" and "a case that could open the door to criminalizing activities that are crucial to American investigative journalists who write about national security matters."

Corporate media's instant reversal on Assange -- from rapist scum to First Amendment hero within minutes -- elevates self-serving hypocrisy to high art. But that's OK. Whatever gets Assange closer to freedom is welcome -- even the jackals of corporate media.

May we linger, however, on an important point that risks getting lost?

- Advertisement -

Even if Assange were guilty of hacking into that Pentagon computer...

Even if it had been Assange's idea...

Even if Manning had had nothing to do with it...

Even if Trump's DOJ hadn't larded on the Espionage Act stuff...

Assange should not have faced any charges.

Included in the material Manning stole from the military and posted to WikiLeaks were the "Afghan War Logs," the "Iraq War Logs," files about the concentration camp at Guanta'namo and the "Collateral Murder" video of the U.S. military's 2007 massacre of civilians in Baghdad.

- Advertisement -

For the sake of argument let's assume that Assange, without Manning, had personally hacked into a Pentagon computer and in doing so discovered proof that U.S. occupation forces in Iraq and Afghanistan were guilty of war crimes, including torture and the mass murder of civilians for fun -- and put that evidence of criminal wrongdoing online. Would Assange deserve a prison term? Of course not. He would merit a medal, a ticker-tape parade, a centrally-located handsome statue or two.

Even if Assange were "guilty" of the hacking charges, so what? The "crime" of which he stands accused pales next to the wrongdoing he helped to expose.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ted Rall Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ted Rall, a political cartoonist, is the author of "The Anti-American Manifesto." He was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1963, raised in Kettering, Ohio and graduated from Fairmont West High School in 1981. His first cartoons were published (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Revolution Will Not Be Deactualized

Coverage of the anti-NSA Protest is an Example of a New Way to Disseminate Government BS

Why Trump is Doomed (It's Not the Nazi Thing)

Now, A Postmortem By Someone Who Actually Saw Trump's Win Coming

Hillary Cheated

Our Suicidal Ruling Class: Why Won't the Rich and Powerful Try to Save Themselves?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


B. Ross Ashley

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Aug 29, 2008), 5 fans, 3 articles, 211 quicklinks, 306 comments, 3 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Assange is not a criminal, and certainly not a traitor (as he owes no allegiance to the US.) He exposed criminal behaviour by the US government.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jun 4, 2019 at 10:49:51 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

David Pear

Become a Fan

(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 46 fans, 74 articles, 317 quicklinks, 3350 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Well said Ted.

The almost all the American people did nothing, not even squawk while the government took away the Bill of Right. Some even cheered that the "government was keeping us safe".

After Snowden, they rewrote the Patriot Act as the Usafreedomact and the media cheered. The public didn't understand they had been screwed again. The only opposition came from a lonely libertarian Ron Paul.

For the last 20 years we have been living under a declared state of emergency,Proclamation 7463, which is basically marshal law.

The public has been desensitised to torture, murder and mayhem---its even seen as unpatriotic not to applaud it.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jun 5, 2019 at 2:18:48 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment