Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 55 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/16/19

Electoral or Popular Vote for President? Can Americans do Fractions?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   7 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Gary Flomenhoft
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

United States electoral college, votes by state LOC 2008626928
United States electoral college, votes by state LOC 2008626928
(Image by (From Wikimedia) Nolan, Jacqueline V.; Congressional Cartography Program (Library Of Congress) /, Author: See Source)
  Details   Source   DMCA

Bush II and Trump were both elected President by winning the electoral college, while losing the popular vote. Putting aside voter suppression, caging, registration stripping, removing voting booths in Democratic districts, interstate crosscheck, and other tricks Republicans engaged in (See, does this really represent the will of the people? No, not really. It's a perverse result, but let's not throw out the electoral college baby with the plurality takes-all bathwater, that really needs to go.

I've been told that one reason for the Electoral college is that the first 5 or so elections would have been decided by New York City otherwise. Everyone agrees it's meant to give smaller, rural states more say in our federal system. Full disclosure, I'm from a small state (Vermont), so I like the concept. But as in all other "winner takes all" elections in the US, the outcome is idiotic if the "winner" is allowed to win with a plurality. Let me give you some examples:

Colorado 1992:
Bill Clinton gets 40.13% of the vote, George HW Bush gets 35.87% of the vote, and Ross Perot gets 23.32% of the vote.

Do the math: 35.87 (Bush) + 23.32 (Perot) = 59.19% of the people voted against Clinton and he still wins all 8 electoral votes. That's a landslide against Clinton. How stupid is that? See for yourself:

How about 1980 in Massachusetts: Reagan gets 41.90%, Carter gets 41.75%, and Independent John Anderson gets 15.15%.

Do the math: 41.75 (Carter) + 15.15 (Anderson) = 56.9% voted against Reagan and he still wins all 14 electoral votes. Really dumb.

How about the pivotal Florida "hanging chad" election in 2000 decided by the Supreme Court stopping the recount:

George W. Bush 48.847%, Al Gore 48.838%, Ralph Nader 1.635%, and other candidates .68%.
Do the math: 48.838 (Gore) + 1.635 (Nader) + .68 (others) = 51.153% voted against Bush and he still wins all 25 electoral votes. Winner takes all is a total farce.

The country is not blue and red by state. Every state is a purple mix:
US voter Registration by county:

Nebraska and Maine already allocate some electoral votes by Congressional District. The solution is much simpler. Allocate electoral votes by percentage of the vote received. I know that's proportional representation, and it's something those libtard, communist, pinko, fags in Europe and nearly every other democracy in the world use, but maybe that's not the problem. Maybe Americans just can't do fractions?

Let's go back to Colorado in 1992:

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Inspiring 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Gary Flomenhoft Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter Page       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Gary Flomenhoft is a decentralist who denies the legitimacy of the US Empire, which consistently commits all four Nuremburg war crimes: crimes against peace (aggressive war), conspiracy to commit crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why There Will Never Be Gun Control In The US

Why Do They Have Billions And We Have None?

How To Explain Complicity Of "Liberals" In The War Crimes Of Obama/Clinton and sudden outrage over Trump's Travel Ban

The Time Machine in Australia-Revisited in the Age of Covid

Covid-19 and Vietnam, JFK, and 911, a Smorgasbord of Lies

A Tale of Two Parties and the end of "Winner Takes all"

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend