Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
Refresh  

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Brute isolation: Trump and the art of unraveling the Iran deal

By       Message Pepe Escobar     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/22/17

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (175 fans)

From Asia Times

- Advertisement -
The Trump administration wants a completely different deal, or it will unilaterally pull out. What follows could be incendiary

From youtube.com: President Trump delivering a speech at the United Nations {MID-166222}
President Trump delivering a speech at the United Nations
(Image by YouTube, Channel: ABC15 Arizona)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Contrary to a barrage of spin, the P5+1 meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly to assess implementation of the Iran nuclear deal did not go especially well, as diplomats confirmed to Asia Times.

US secretary of state Rex Tillerson was forced to concede Tehran is abiding by the deal. But once again he hammered the new US meme -- now it's about Iran not fulfilling "expectations."

At a tense table, Tillerson -- for the first time -- met Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. At least the spin was not explosive. "There was no yelling," he said later. "We didn't throw shoes at one another. It was not an angry tone at all."

- Advertisement -

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini -- not exactly the brightest bulb in the room -- was compelled to stress there was no doubt the deal was being respected. She even warned, "all member states are considered to be bound by its implementation. The international community cannot afford to dismantle an agreement that is working and delivering."

Russia and China won't renegotiate the deal -- and that's final. And the EU members of the P5+1 -- France, the UK and Germany -- will also stick to it, as Mogherini herself confirmed.

By now, even bears stranded on melting Arctic glaciers know President Trump has added a cliffhanger, having announced that he has "decided." Nobody knows what he has decided, even Tillerson. And yet, even the commander of US Strategic Command, Gen. John Hyten, has admitted, "the facts are that Iran is operating under the agreements that we signed up for under the JCPOA."

- Advertisement -

What has happened is that the Trump administration has changed the narrative from being about a technical, nuclear-centered agreement, to one that encompasses Iran's geopolitical reach in Syria, Iraq and Yemen, as well as its missile program and cyber operations -- all non-nuclear issues that Mogherini herself stressed were "outside the scope" of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action).

I followed the nuclear negotiations in Vienna in 2015 for Asia Times. Even then the US delegation was doing everything to include ballistic missiles, something that was thoroughly rejected by other parties, especially by Russia and China.

So for all practical purposes, the Trump administration wants a completely different deal, or it will unilaterally pull out. Technically, that means going against a UNSC resolution supported by international law. So what about the "path of moderation"?

At the UN pulpit, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani delivered a measured, elegant, cultured and at the same time scathing speech thoroughly debunking Trump's assertions with actual facts. The overall theme was "the path of moderation." A particular pearl: "Moderation is the synergy of ideas and not the dance of swords." The contrast with the bellicose, Manichean Trump Doctrine was stark.

Rouhani never ceases to point out that the JCPOA could become "a new model for international relations" -- a framework to be considered, for example, in the case of the intractable DPRK. German chancellor Angela Merkel, on the record, agrees. But now Rouhani has also been forced to stress that Tehran's response to a possible US abrogation will be conditioned by how the Europeans respond.

The new Roi Soleil, French President Emmanuel Macron, has eagerly stepped into the fray, posing as a mediator between Washington and the other P5+1 members. But in fact Macron's touting of new "pillars" -- restrictions on ballistic missiles; a follow-on deal that would apply after 2025; and an "open discussion with Iran about the current situation in the region" -- amount to endorsing the Trump administration's changing of the rules.

- Advertisement -

If Trump decides the US is going to pull out of the JCPOA, Tehran has stated, on the record, that it will remain committed, as long as the other P5+1 members stay -- and they will. The problem will be when the Trump administration, supported by Capitol Hill, subsequently takes the inevitable path of an extra barrage of sanctions against Iran -- with possible incendiary consequences.

What's clear is that neither "RC" -- the Russia-China strategic partnership -- nor the Europeans will isolate Tehran. For "RC" in particular, it's all about Iran's destiny as a key hub in the interpenetrating Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and North-South Transportation Corridor, its future full membership of the SCO and even, possibly, BRICS Plus, and its capacity to be a future supplier of natural gas to Europe. Moreover, Rouhani has repeatedly stressed that, whatever happens, Tehran will never aim to build a nuclear weapon.

Trump's fateful decision in fact conditions and frames how he will deal with North Korea. Pulling out of the JCPOA will send an unmistakable message to Pyongyang and also complicate the efforts of "RC" to defuse the situation. The DPRK will never bother to even consider negotiating with a "compassionate nation" that refuses to live up to multilateral commitments.

And all this sound and fury from the US will, ultimately, signify only one thing: another multi-trillion-dollar, unwinnable war in Southwest Asia, simply to indulge the wet dreams of assorted Beltway armchair generals.

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jun 2, 2011), 40 fans, 62 articles, 2653 comments, 2 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

We install and tolerate madmen in the top positions of government, then are astonished when madness infects all of our policies and dealings with the rest of the world community.

I keep plugging my Peace Dividend plan, not because it draws attention to me, but because it is the only plan on the table, extreme and outrageous as it is, to confront the imperial neocon sociopaths, disable the war machine, isolate the lunatics in Congress, and exile the warmongers from power.

If there's a better plan, I'm all for it. If there's a better way to mobilize the insouciant public, let's go for it. If there isn't, what alternative do we have? Waving signs, shouting peace mantras, singing "Give Peace A Chance"?

The Peace Dividend strategy is so outside-the-box, it could work. It focuses the diffuse energy of what's left of the anti-war movement in this country, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY incentivizes 150 million Americans who right now are too preoccupied with surviving, TO PAY ATTENTION. It literally PAYS THEM TO PAY ATTENTION.

Is this crude? Is this bribery? I don't think so but frankly don't give a flying f*ck if it will steer America off its current horrifying, self-destructive obsession with bomb-bomb-bomb diplomacy.

Forget who sent you there. Just look at this and get behind it.

PEACE DIVIDEND


Submitted on Saturday, Sep 23, 2017 at 1:33:33 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

ThirdEyeOfTheStorm

Become a Fan
Author 70364

(Member since Aug 20, 2011), 14 fans, 4 articles, 1 quicklinks, 1958 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Has the US EVER made a treaty or trade agreement that it hasn't broken? Ask the Indians (previous owners) about the word of the US, they will tell you blatantly that there is no integrity to be found there. Eminent domain and manifest destiny, is the philosophy of the "exceptional people" and their Empire.

SunTzuSez, "The art of war is deception". What fool would take the word of such a critter? I'll tell you. A dead and defeated fool.

We have no conscience, no moral compass. We, the Americans are murderers, pure and simple. There is no way to sugarcoat it, to make it palatable. This is the bitter truth.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:07:06 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment