Duluth, MN (OpEdNws) February 6, 2011: George Dennis O'Brien (aka G. Dennis O'Brien) has written his short 185-page book THE CHURCH AND ABORTION: A CATHOLIC DISSENT (Rowman & Littlefield, 2010) for his fellow practicing Catholics. Many practicing Catholics are evidently afraid to debate the questionable teachings of the Catholic bishops regarding abortion publicly. But not O'Brien. He holds a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Chicago (1961) and is the author of the book HEGEL ON REASON AND HISTORY (University of Chicago Press, 1975). But he's now retired after a long and distinguished career as an academic administrator. His retirement may have contributed to his courage to debate the questionable teachings of the Catholic bishops.
Nevertheless, as a reprisal for debating the teachings of the Catholic bishops about abortion, O'Brien's local bishop could deny him communion at Sunday Mass. Local bishops have the authority to make fools of themselves whenever they want to. For example, Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted recently declared St. Joseph's Hospital in Phoenix could no longer be considered to be a Catholic hospital because an abortion was performed in the hospital in an emergency situation to save the mother's life. Everybody agrees that he had the authority to make a fool of himself as he did. Such is the frightening authority of the Catholic bishops. So who knows what O'Brien's local bishop will do to him for publicly debating the questionable teachings of the Catholic bishops regarding abortion?
Even though this book has been written by a practicing Catholic for his fellow practicing Catholics, non-Catholics who are concerned about the abortion debate in the United States might want to read O'Brien's book. Even if you happen to disagree with him occasionally, as I myself do, you'll probably find the book stimulating and thought provoking to read.
Disclosure: Even though I was a Jesuit seminarian for a number of years earlier in my life, I am not a practicing Catholic at this time. Moreover, I have published an op-ed piece online titled "The Questionable Ethical Teachings of the Catholic Bishops Regarding Abortion in the First Trimester Should Be Debated" at OpEdNews.com on January 3, 2011. From what O'Brien says in his book, he probably would not accept my reasoning in my article, just as I am not impressed with everything he says in his book.
Nevertheless, throughout his dispassionate book, O'Brien comes across as an attentive, intelligent, reasonable, and responsible American citizen who is addressing his fellow practicing Catholics about public discourse and debate in the United States regarding abortion.
But O'Brien has evidently not asked himself the crucial question that Americans concerned about the antiabortion zeal of the Catholic bishops should ask: What's in it for the Catholic bishops to stir up antiabortion anguish? In a word, money. By stirring up antiabortion anguish, the Catholic bishops can keep conservative antiabortion Catholics stirred up and willing to contribute their money to the bishops. The greed of Catholic bishops and priests has been well known at least since Dante's INFERNO.
In the twentieth century, the Catholic bishops and priests stirred up anticommunist fervor, because the communist regimes were officially against religion. The communists in the former Soviet Union, for example, made the practice of religion against the law; the Soviet communists wanted to put the Catholic bishops and priests out of business. As a result, the Catholic bishops and priests fomented anticommunist fervor among Catholics. But since the Supreme Court of the United States legalized abortion in 1973, antiabortion fervor has replaced anticommunist fervor as a way for Catholic bishops and priests to keep Catholics contributing money to them.
Moreover, we should never forget that the dubious ethical judgments of Catholic bishops contributed enormously to the priest sex abuse scandal.