Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 57 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Life Arts   

A Practicing Catholic Debates the Questionable Teachings of the Catholic Bishops Regarding Abortion (BOOK REVIEW)

By       (Page 4 of 5 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

Thomas Farrell
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

Next, I should discuss pathos. In the abortion debate, the Catholic bishops stir up pathos by referring to the loss of innocent human lives through abortion in the first trimester.

 

Unfortunately, we have not heard the Catholic bishops speak about the loss of innocent human life in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, where noncombatants are killed through American action and referred to as "collateral damage" (i.e., the loss of innocent human life). If the Catholic bishops are concerned about the loss of innocent human life, why aren't they leading antiwar protests against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq? I guess that leading antiwar protests would not help the bishops make money from conservative Catholics. So the Catholic bishops are selective in their concern about the loss of innocent human life. They know a money-maker when they see one.

 

Next, I should discuss logos. O'Brien centers his attention on logos in his many-faceted critique of the Catholic bishops. Fetzer also centers his reasoning on logos in his fine chapter about abortion in the first trimester. So do I in my above-mentioned article about abortion in the first trimester. So there is more than one way to use logos to discuss abortion. But the Catholic bishops appear to believe that their way of thinking deserves to prevail over all other ways of thinking, because they fantasize that they have some special authority due to their fantasy about being successors of Jesus's apostles. But the NEW YORK TIMES' editorial writers have given the Catholic bishops a pass by referring to their ethical teachings regarding abortion as "religious doctrines."

 

In other words, centuries before John Henry Newman (1801-1890), the Roman Catholic convert who became a Catholic cardinal and who was beatified by Pope Benedict XVI on September 19, 2010, used the expression "the whole man moves" in 1867 in his book APOLOGIA PRO VITA SUA, Aristotle in effect understood that "the whole man moves." Aristotle understood that logos, pathos, and ethos should work together to prompt people to move to action, such as the action of voting for a particular course of action. But O'Brien centers his attention on logos, on trying to get people to change their thought-world. (The expression "the whole man moves" is sexist. I have no problem with the idea of using the expression "the whole person moves," except when I mean to indicate exactly what Newman said.)

 

Related Reading: For an introductory discussion of Newman's rhetorical thought, the interested reader should see Walter Jost's book RHETORICAL THOUGHT IN JOHN HENRY NEWMAN (University of South Carolina Press, 1989). For an excellent discussion of Aristotle's view of ethos, the interested reader should see William M. A. Grimaldi's article "The Auditors' Role in Aristotelian Rhetoric" in the anthology ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: HISTORICAL APPROACHES, edited by Richard Leo Enos (Sage Publications, 1990, pages 65-81).

 

Now, Albert Ellis is famous for pioneering rational-emotive-behavioral therapy. He claims, correctly in my judgment, that when people change their thought-world, their emotional responses to events and even their behavior will change as a result. O'Brien clearly aims to examine the thought-world of the Catholic bishops. Good for him.

 

But how do we move to change our thought-world? What moves us to change our thought-world? Are we supposed to be moved to change our thought-world by simply having O'Brien set forth certain implications of the antiabortion thought-world as presented by the Catholic bishops?

 

Usually, something needs to move us to consider changing our thought-world before we reach the juncture of examining alternative thoughts to our already established thought-world, such as the thoughts and implications that O'Brien works out. Aristotle suggests that alternative thoughts alone will probably not move us to change our thought-world. He suggests that pathos and ethos need to be added to the mix of thoughts (logos) to persuade us and move us to action. But in his dispassionate book, O'Brien centers his attention on logos.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend