Israeli bloggers and the vengeful judges: Judge Abraham Heiman's despicable fraud upon the court

Dear Sir:

Following your inquiry, we herein inform you that the reference for imprisonment in the Prison Service is an Arrest Warrant/Detention Warrant, signed by a judge -- original only! Regarding FOIA Officer -- there is a permanent element in the Prison Service Legal Bureau, who is appointed on the Freedom of Information Act.

FYI.

Truly,

Eti Gover, Senior Warden

Inquiries and Complaints Coordinator, Prison Service.

__________

Judge Abraham Heiman's previous fake "protocol" in the bloggers' case is subject of an appeal before the Israeli Supreme Court

The October 26 spectacle was not the first time that Judge Abraham Heiman conducted a sham/simulated court hearing and produced a fake/"draft" "protocol" in the bloggers' case. Also on September 11, 2017, he produced a "protocol", which was produced in such a sloppy manner, that it could easily be proved to be a fake/"draft".

Moreover, following challenges to validity of the September 11, 2017 "protocol" document, Judge Heiman issued decisions, which fully documented his intention to defraud - leaving the parties and the public in the dark regarding the question, whether a document, which he had served as "protocol", was indeed an authentic, valid and effectual court record.

(Image by Public - fake record of the Tel-Aviv District Court)   Details   DMCA

I have nothing to add but repeat my September 10, 2017 decision.

Inasmuch the Requester has claims regarding the authenticity of the protocol, he should address it using the appropriate procedure, if such procedure exists, which is not a request to inspect in instant court file.

__________

Judge Abraham Heiman's deceit in the August 15 protocol in the bloggers' case is the matter in an appeal, which was filed in the Israeli Supreme Court on October 01, 2017 [Zernik v State of Israel et al (7631/17) ]. [viii] The appeal raises the question:

Is a court permitted to serve on a person documents in a criminal process, with the intention that their recipient accept their authority as valid court decisions or judgments, and at the same time hold the authenticity of the same documents as valid court records a riddle?

Immediately upon filing of the appeal, the Supreme Court imposed fake, unlawful sealing on the entire court file in its public access system.

(Image by Public - fake record of the Israel Supreme Court)   Details   DMCA

Figure. Zernik v State of Israel et al (7253/17) in the Supreme Court - appeal from State of Israel v Shem-Tov et al (14280-04-17) as viewed in the Supreme Court's public access system - "sealed". Even the court caption is hidden.

__________

To this date the case has not been assigned to a justice and no decision has been rendered either.

Widespread corruption of the courts

The Human Rights Alert-NGO submission for the 2013 Periodic Review of Human Rights in Israel by the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) focused on documenting the invalidity of case-management systems of the courts. The submission was incorporated into the HRC's final report with the note: "Lack of integrity in electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the District Courts and the Detainees Courts in Israel". [ix]

The Human Rights Alert-NGO submission for the 2018 Periodic Review of Human Rights in Israel by the UN Human Rights Council expanded the previous submission, and added full documentation of numerous cases, where such invalidity of court records was employed for abuse of human rights. The latest submission, currently pending review, claims: "Incompetence and/or corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in Israel". [ⁱ]

LINKS

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).