It's an international movement, in fact, called Housing First, kicked off in the 1980s by Canadian psychologist Sam Tsemberis, that has been adopted in cities and towns on three continents.
The Finns estimate that simply giving homeless people housing will cost the country 15,000 Euros per year per homeless person less -- than the current cost of jails, emergency medical services, courts, crime, etc.
Housing the homeless in America will require building or acquiring housing for homeless people who are capable of taking care of themselves, and providing mental health services and institutions for those who are so impaired they can't care for themselves.
The problem here is that having government house the homeless involves the government spending money, which means we'd have to raise that money by increasing taxes, which means that the billionaires who control the political systems of most of America loudly object.
Morbidly rich people, after all, don't have to interact with homeless people on the streets or worry about homeless people peeing in their yards or breaking into their houses in search of food or things that can be sold to acquire food.
This isn't rocket science.
Just give people housing. And run our economy in ways that working people at the bottom of the economic ladder are making enough money to be able to afford to live in the communities where they work.
Wealthier democracies around the world have largely done it by purchasing or building those homes and apartments and providing housing to people who have none.
We did it here in the 1960s with LBJ's Great Society programs that cut poverty in this country about in half in a decade. Until Reagan destroyed them.
We talk about homelessness in America as if it's a normal state of nature or the predictable outcome of the human condition. It is neither.
Homelessness is the consequence of greed, pure and simple. Greedy wealthy people who the Supreme Court allowed to own politicians and then refuse to pay their fair share of taxes.
If we could just get past that Republican obstacle, we could end homelessness here in the US, too.
People who are homeless because they are mentally ill or addicted need a place to live and mental health services. People who are homeless because of poverty need housing and either a good job or a reasonable subsidy.
Yes, it may involve directing money and resources to a few people who are "unwilling to work" and thus would be deemed by Republicans as "parasites." A healthy society can afford a few such people; the quality of life for everybody else will improve so much it's actually a great investment, as the Finns have shown.
"House the homeless" and "Make sure working people can afford a place to live."
It's a simple solution that has been embraced by countries all around the world. Time to repudiate the failed Reaganomics experiment and take it seriously again here in America.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
1
