Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H2'ed 8/5/16

Reaching Beyond the Candidates with Bob Koehler

By       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page. (View How Many People Read This)   1 comment, 7 series
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
Become a Fan
  (87 fans)

JB: I read this morning that Trump's fundraising has skyrocketed despite the rash of seemingly purposeful gaffes of his. And more surprising is that the moolah is pouring in from small donors. I wouldn't have predicted that, would you?

BK: I wouldn't have predicted anything about Trump's campaign success. The media devote endless negative attention to him and have so far failed to destroy him, almost as though he has magic powers. His unbreakable popularity is a conundrum of immense proportions. Certainly his supporters feel alienated by the centrist/neocon establishment, and perhaps they view any assault on him as a positive. Maybe that's totally it. His negatives are campaign positives. It's not clear what he actually stands for. Some progressives see him as more liberal than conservative -- that his real values are left of center, but he's pretending to be a rightwinger to win the election. I don't believe this, but I find it fascinating that others do.

Donald Trump
Donald Trump
(Image by Gage Skidmore)
  Details   DMCA

JB: What do you make of his gaffes, some of them quite egregious and outlandish? Throwing a baby out of a rally? Not knowing basic foreign policy facts? Who the heck knows what he knows? He seems to be taunting us with his popularity which isn't tied to any positive metric: trustworthiness, experience, values, etc. What an outlier he is!

BK: He's a conqueror, a dominator, an emperor. He's Mussolini. He can say anything he wants, seemingly. He speaks impulsively. I think all of these gaffes have general appeal to a certain part of the electorate because they have felt repressed for decades (since the end of Jim Crow) by political correctness. Trump brings hope to racists!

JB: Yuck. There's a raging debate going on whether Trump is trying to "throw" the election because he doesn't really want to be president. I'd already read that he's committed to turning over the executive functions to his VP. I believe that is unprecedented. Pence could become virtually an acting president without running in a single primary or receiving a single vote. What's going on here?

BK: Whatever is going on is unprecedented. Maybe only the perspective of history will tell us (fifty or a hundred years from now). Maybe Trump's agenda begins and ends with his ego. My guess is that it's more than that -- maybe every theory about him is partially correct. One thing that's clear: his values don't fit into a neat, establishment package. He's no more crazy than most Republicans (and most center-right Dems) about foreign policy, but the craziness is unavoidably apparent because he doesn't speak in PC code language. Once again, I think it's his impulsive directness, far more than any policy position or pretend policy position, that is his biggest appeal.

JB: Let's talk about the Bernie legacy for a moment. Many are disappointed that he ultimately endorsed Hillary, especially with all the betrayals along the way. What did Bernie bring to the mix in 2016 and how, if at all, will it change the way we look at politics?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Other Series: View All 30 Articles in "Hillary Clinton"

Other Series: View All 22 Articles in "Military/Foreign Policy"

Other Series: View All 195 Articles in "Activism"

Other Series: View All 18 Articles in "Progressives"

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: