Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 60 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 2/2/18  

Menace and Mush: Trump's State of the Union

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Robert Borosage
Message Robert Borosage
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

Unmentionable is the extent to which the administration has made the government, as Trump stated in Davos, "open for business." Tax cuts for the wealthy and the rollback of Obamacare took priority in the first year. Deregulation features rollback of protections for workers, consumers and civil rights and the environment. Government accountability translates into open season for corporate lobbies and entrenched interests. His judicial appointments are packing the courts with pro-corporate judges.

Trump's executive orders stripped millions of workers of the right to overtime pay, empowered employers to pocket the tips of tipped workers, and gave financial advisers a free pass to cheat the workers in their retirement accounts. The betrayal of the "forgotten working people" that he constantly invokes is shameless and complete.

"Our military is no longer undermined by artificial timelines"

On national security policy, Trump presented himself, as he always does, as tougher than Obama. He took credit for defeating ISIS, boasted about doubling down in Afghanistan, scorned the "terrible Iran nuclear deal," promised to stop North Korea's nuclear buildup occurring because of "failures of past administrations," moved to expand, not close, use of Guantanamo prison, and revive sanctions against Cuba and Venezuela.

Many commented on Trump's failure to mention the Russian interference in our elections and those of our allies. There was no sign of Trump's campaign skepticism about "stupid wars." The threat posed by catastrophic climate change is consigned to the memory hole.

Strikingly, Trump mentioned China and Russia only in passing. Yet in its recent strategy documents, his administration has declared that the growing confrontation with China and Russia poses a greater threat than terrorism.

As Secretary Mattis put it in presenting the National Defense Strategy, "[W]e will continue to prosecute the campaign against terrorists that we are engaged in today, but great power competition, not terrorism, is now the primary focus of U.S. national security." [emphasis added]. China and Russia are tagged as "revisionist powers" posing the "central challenge to US prosperity and security."

In response, Trump's National Defense Strategy calls for a military force that is dominant across the full "spectrum of conflict" -- from Special Forces to nuclear weapons, and across the full range of "theaters" -- from cyberspace to outer space, from the Russian border to the South China Sea. This, of course, is a charter for massive expansion of military spending.

In his speech, Trump called for "fully funding the military" and for rebuilding our nuclear arsenal, but did not bother to inform Americans that a new Cold War against both China and Russia is now the primary focus of the Pentagon, not the war on terror.

Perhaps the president retains his desire for better relations with Russia. Perhaps he is ignorant of the stated change in security priorities. Perhaps he thought it would distract from his posturing on MS-15 at home and terrorists and North Korea abroad. It is, however, truly bizarre that one of the more ominous developments in Trump's first year in office went without mention.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Borosage Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert L. Borosage is the president of the Institute for America's Future and co-director of its sister organization, the Campaign for America's Future. The organizations were launched by 100 prominent Americans to challenge the rightward drift (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Symbolic Blather: Washington's Congenital Disease

Republicans in Congress Think You're an Idiot

The Pentagon's Plan for Never-Ending War

Whose Side Are You On: The Moral Clarity of Occupy Wall Street

The Real Deal on Trump's Trade Tantrums

The Geniuses Who Brought You the Iraq War Are at It Again

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend