361 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 62 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/10/16

Bowing to Democratic Party pressure, Sanders pledges to back Clinton

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   11 comments

Patrick Martin
Message Patrick Martin

When "Today Show" host Savannah Guthrie asked if he had "overreacted" to reports that Clinton had called him unqualified, and responded in kind, Sanders replied with praise for the Democratic frontrunner.

"Here's the truth," he said. "I've known Hillary Clinton for 25 years. I respect Hillary Clinton. We were colleagues in the Senate, and on her worst day, she would be an infinitely better president than either of the Republican candidates."

"She's qualified?" Guthrie asked. "Of course," Sanders replied, and dismissed the three-day controversy as "media stuff."

The entire episode began with a deliberately prepared trap, when Sanders gave a lengthy interview to the editorial board of the New York Daily News. The tabloid ripped a single sentence from the hour-long discussion as the basis for a screaming headline accusing Sanders of insensitivity toward the families of the children killed by a deranged gunman in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012.

This was followed by further claims, by the media and the Clinton campaign, that Sanders had botched his answers to questions about breaking up the major banks and about US policy towards Israel. Then came Clinton's declaration that Sanders "hadn't done his homework," transmuted by the Washington Post into a headline claiming Clinton had said Sanders was not qualified to be president, and Sanders' response along similar lines.

The sequence of events demonstrates the orchestrated and manipulated character of the 2016 election campaign. Once Sanders had made his statement that Clinton was "not qualified," the entire Democratic Party establishment came down on him. This was particularly noticeable among Sanders' own colleagues in the Senate, where 40 of 46 Democrats have endorsed Clinton and none have endorsed Sanders.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid denounced Sanders' comments about Clinton, but not Clinton's about Sanders, saying, "Everybody knows she's qualified. So he shouldn't be doing that."

Senator Dianne Feinstein of California said, "I'm very concerned about the tone. I think it's inordinately destructive, and I think it shouldn't happen. I think this kind of disparagement doesn't do Senator Sanders any good and doesn't do Senator Clinton any good and doesn't do the Democratic Party any good."

Senator Claire McCaskill tweeted: "C'mon Bernie. Not qualified? Remember what we all have to do together in November." McCaskill, Feinstein and Reid have all endorsed Clinton.

The exchanges between Sanders and Clinton came with a pivotal New York primary only 10 days away. While Clinton holds a lead of about 250 elected delegates, Sanders has won seven out of eight contests over the last two weeks.

Sanders has not deviated from his pledge, made when he entered the race for the Democratic nomination a year ago, that he would support the nominee of the party convention, whoever it was.

Asked on the "Today Show" Friday about his plans if he lost the nomination, Sanders called it a "fair question," then declared, "We have brought out and seen so much excitement on the part of young people, who have so much hope for this country, who want to make this country a better place. We will continue that revolution."

Given that Sanders has defined his "political revolution" as motivating his supporters to work for Democratic Party candidates for Congress and state office as well as the White House, this amounts to a pledge by the former "independent" senator that he is unalterably committed to the Democratic Party. The so-called "democratic socialist" is seeking to reinforce the political monopoly that big business exercises through the two-party system of Democrats and Republicans.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Patrick Martin Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Patrick Martin writes for the World Socialist Website (wsws.org), a forum for socialist ideas & analysis & published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI).
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Low-wage, No-raise Economy

Mounting political crisis in Washington amidst talk of removal of Trump

US House of Representatives votes to abolish Medicare

Nearly One Million US Workers Cut Off Unemployment Benefits

Obama hails deal to impose record cuts in social spending

US House of Representatives approves plan to destroy Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend