Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 9/7/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (149 comments)

High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's Theory Falls Apart

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

911 Commission co-chairs claim that they were misled, perhaps deliberately, by the Bush administration and Pentagon brass. Because 911 was an act of mass murder overtly covered up by the Bush administration, the many lies by Bush amount to more than mere obstructions of justice or cover ups. They amount to high treason --a mechanism by which this administration seized power unconstitutionally. Holes in Bush's theories are holes in Bush's theories. Lack of evidence in support of Bush does not refute his critics who point them out. Bush's many lies and overt efforts to obstruct justice, it is hoped, will bring about the 'controlled demolition' of this illegal and illegitimate regime.

Instead of making a big scene and dropping a bombshell so-to-speak, the commission 'compromised' and deferred to the justice department so that it could pursue criminal investigations.

Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.

Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon

As we are all well aware, criminal charges were never made and it looks like interest in pursuing 'justice' wasn't a top priority for the Department of Justice.

The panel agreed to a compromise, turning over the allegations to the inspectors general for the Defense and Transportation departments, who can make criminal referrals if they believe they are warranted, officials said.

"We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. "It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
Liberals have been shouting the Bush Administration for some time now. In fact, the hatred for our administration is so strong that Republicans had to concoct rhetoric in order to deal with the anger. "BDS" short for Bush Derangement Syndrome is all that the GOP die-hards could come up with to combat the allegations of impropriety and lawlessness that best characterizes President Bush and his administration of bandits.

--Did the Pentagon Lie To 9/11 Commission?

I recently posted NTSB data indicating that Flight 77 never dropped below 273 feet after take off and could not, therefore, have crashed into the Pentagon! Damien followed up with NTSB data contradicting every Bush administration statement with regard to Flight 93, another mysterious crash characterized by the lack of airliner wreckage. [See: NTSB Filght Data: Official 'Explanation' of Flight 93 is a Criminal Fraud!; NTSB Flight Data: Flight 77 Could Not Have Crashed into the Pentagon]
Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts -- since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today -- and the United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts.

Pilots for 911 Truth

Damien, a regular contributor to The Existentialist Cowboy, has put together an exhaustive survey of disturbing holes in the official theories concerning Flight 93 which we have been expected to believe crashed in PA. Following is Damien's report:


The evidence discrepancies from Flight 77 are echoed in the absurdities of Flight 93. This from Pilots for 911 Truth:

1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations. 2. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times. 3. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt. 4. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion. 5. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests. That's right, the flight data recorder has the plane impacting upside down at 40 degrees to the horizontal. You could google all day and never find an image showing where the huge tail hit the ground! You will only ever see vertical impact photos. The only photo shows a smoke plume more consistent with a smaller ordinance explosion. There are no heavy kerosene fumes filling the sky. According to FDR data there was 17.01 tons (5,500 gals) of fuel left at time of impact. Yet the EPA found no ground contamination from jet fuel. Unbelievable! "We (were) literally surrounded by debris, and there's a very strong odor of scorched earth," witness Jim Parsons reported. "It doesn't smell like jet fuel, it smells like ... How do you describe it? Burned earth. It smells like burned earth." - Pittsburgh Channel (09/11/01) The impact hole is 75' wide and the aircraft is 125' feet wide. (See also here) The volume of debris is too small. The only photos released by the authorities showing small debris. Multiple witnesses at the Shanksville site reported on the lack of debris. The FBI claims that it recovers 95 percent of the plane and sent it on to United Airlines. That would be about 60 tons of plane debris. I defy anyone to produce evidence that 60 tons of plane debris was taken from Shankesville or forwarded to UA. Lies! Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller reported that they had found "unspecified human remains and enough minuscule pieces of plane debris to fill one-third of a dumpster." That's right, 1/3 of a dumpster! This dumpster! The "recovered" remains, allegedly from Fl93, are anomalous and are suggestive of evidence tampering. -- A terrorist passport found in the streets of New York that "survived" the WTC attacks and a Koran and materials recovered from Mohammed Atta's car all apear to be staged evidence, as does the unmarked red bandana and terrorist driver's licence recovered at Shanksville. When 200 airline seats are totally destroyed you don't expect to find unmarked red bandanas and bibles! The human remains (600 lbs) does not compare with the passenger weights (4 tons). Modern, high temperature crematoria take 2 hours to burn bodies yet we are expected to believe that 4 tons of human remains disappeared ("vaporised") in an instant leaving only 150- 600lbs of tissue shreds. The temperatures were simply not high enough to dispose of that volume of human remains in such a small time frame. If the bodies burned above ground they would have left a recognizable offensive smell (burnt tissue like at a BBQ) that would have been noticed just like at other aircraft crash sites. Carbon based objects such as humans, luggage and seating require oxygen to burn. If they were burned above ground they would have produced larger amounts of smoke than was seen. Had they passed into the ground they would not have burned because there was no oxygen; they might have been shredded, but not consumed by fire. So if the seats burned above ground then 200 seat frames would be there somehwhere. They're not. Instead, we have this. Officially, the largest piece found of Fl 93 was a seven-foot-long piece of the fuselage skin, including four windows. Given that the wings are 125' wide with a 40' high tail then that's a load of baloney right there! There is no verifiable evidence chain of custody on the debris, human remains or FDR. The FBI refused to allow either the FAA or NTSB carry out investigations required of them by law and which they had undertaken as standard procedure for ALL previous aircraft crashes occuring in the US over many decades. The FBI did NOT carry out any forensic evaluation of the crash nor permit anyone else to do so. That's a profoundly unprofessional course of action given that one caller from Fl 93 late in the flight said a bomb had possibly blown up in the plane. Neither the NTSB or the FAA handled the evidence, only the FBI. Isn't that their job? -- yes it is, but they have no legal authority to prohibit, hinder or obstruct legally mandated inquiries by the FAA and the NTSB that should have taken place. They were forbidden from doing so. The FBI also had clear obligations in regard to the handling of evidence which they failed to fulfill. The usual investigative procedures in regard to flight crashes and the handling of evidence were not followed in regard to 911. Whatever happened at Shanksville, the official 911 account is baloney! In Aug 2006 a Russian plane, almost identical in size to Fl93, crashed in Siberia. They recovered 140 bodies and huge amounts a debris. But nothing like that at Shankesville.

--Damien


Damien's report is a damning critique and proof that the Bush cabal cover stories about Flight 93 violate the laws of physics and "Occam's Razor'. Bush's cover stories raise infinitely more questions than his theories have been able to explain .

Any theory that raises more questions than it explains must be discarded.

The FBI released the following footage, apparently an effort to put to rest 'outlandish' conclusions based upon NTSB flight data indicating that Flight 77 NEVER reached an altitude less than 273 feet since its first ascent upon take-off! Now --keep in mind that this FBI footage is supposed to put to rest those 'outlandish conspiracy theories' that Bush warned us about. Please keep in mind that this video is not intended to create even more 'outlandish conspiracy theories', though, I am sure that had been the result. Therefore, after watching the following video, please resist the urge to call up the FBI while yelling FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD!!!

No 757 Visible in Video of Pentagon Crash

The video was requested by Flight77.info, a group seeking 911 information that the government has been withholding. A statement from the group notes that the 'video does not ...show the plane in flight.'

I would venture to say that Flight 77 is not visible in the video simply because it was not video taped 'crashing into the Pentagon. It was not video taped crashing into the Pentagon because it never crashed into the Pentagon.

My assertion not merely a challenge to the Bush administration to put up or shut, it is consistent with "official" flight 77 data released to Pilotsfor911truth in response to their FOIA request.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/

Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
149 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Great Job Len by Bob Gormley on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:26:47 AM
thanks bob by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:26:15 AM
Excellent by Bia Winter on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:21:54 AM
You really think Obama will touch 9/11? by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:44:34 AM
you're right about Obama by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:02:12 PM
The Big Lie by Wolfie on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:04:49 PM
I'm constantly amazed over the magnitude by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:11:17 PM
As I consider the puzzle by pft on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:29:40 PM
Where's the Anger? by Rafe Pilgrim on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:37:32 AM
We can't wait on "history" by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:52:07 PM
You're losing me by Nick van Nes on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:07:37 AM
NIST and WTC 7 by gravity32 on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:19:21 AM
Good stuff, Len, but .... by Keith Mothersson on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:09:58 AM
Video fakery by Cassie on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:26:04 AM
witnesses by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:55:12 PM
I address all these issues... by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:22:55 PM
Energy weapons by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:13:01 AM
I finally located the video of Albury Smith on 9/11 by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:05:30 PM
The witness by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:50:23 PM
THE TALKING POINTS WERE PLANTED by Len Hart on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:32:17 PM
Why fool the editors? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:09:33 AM
I never thought I'd get into this but... by Cheryl Abraham on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:11:36 AM
no airliner struck the Pentagon by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:45:53 PM
Shhhhhh.... by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:09:32 PM
shhhhhh by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:41:42 AM
All Politicians Guilty Of High Treason by arlen custer on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:25:38 AM
Congress with Nancy and Harry in the lead by Susan Nelsen on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:29:30 AM
you make dishonest assumptions and raise strawmen by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:03:02 PM
Len, don't waste your time ... by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:54:24 PM
Re: '...don't waste your time..." by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:37:23 AM
You two are a hoot by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:04:28 AM
I think Bill OReilly also attended Harvard for his Masters by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:31:26 PM
The saga by Kahnaya Wasahtoha on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:45:35 PM
Lied to the 911 Cover-up Commission by Philip Dennany on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:03:48 PM
"Covering" crashes by Alan Williams on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:23:32 PM
Have you personally met the 911 hijackers? by ken on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:02:04 AM
Honey by richard on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:41:50 PM
911 commission by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:30:14 AM
Some clarification is needed here by ken on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:16:14 AM
RE: Some clarification is needed here by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:39:40 AM
Pawn to king bishop three by Nemo on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:04:56 PM
Lest We Forget. The Pentagon Impact Point. by Ishmael1 on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:10:08 PM
here's some data by shirley reese on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:01:35 PM
the Official Story defies physics, economics, policy & data by Jack Flanders on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:45:43 PM
Re: "Official Story defies physics, economics, policy & data by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:20:58 AM
Despicable cowards by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11:01 AM
"Despicable cowards" by Jack Flanders on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:32:29 PM
Quite a conspiracy by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:20:51 AM
making up your own facts? by Jack Flanders on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:03:47 AM
Then argue with these people, Jack by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:21:34 AM
wrong again by Jack Flanders on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:22:12 AM
I haven't been proven wrong once by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:50:31 PM
Your evidence is unreliable by Jack Flanders on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:56:46 PM
Your evidence is nonexistent by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:36:32 PM
So where's the video? by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:49:06 AM
More sophistry from the "truth" movement by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:37:44 PM
Official smoke screen exposed by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:29:12 PM
Smokescreen? by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:31:14 PM
The hole was insufficient by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:47:20 PM
Way too many assumptions by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:42:23 PM
No assumptions, just physics by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:21:59 PM
"No assumptions, just physics" by Jack Flanders on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:09:59 AM
one more observation by Jack Flanders on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:13:59 AM
"The hole was insufficient" by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:39:12 AM
Here's a thought, Len by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:34:15 AM
some "thought" by Jack Flanders on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:24:00 PM
Diversion by pft on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:37:26 AM
Re: High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' by Munich on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:01:26 AM
high treason and mass murder by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:50:33 AM
covering crashes by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:13:50 AM
You didn't cover this one by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:23:50 AM
Your list was meaningless by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:14:07 PM
If they were there by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:36:29 AM
Mohammed Atta by Bia Winter on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:21:42 AM
How gullible can you get? by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:54:26 PM
Re: How gullible can you get? by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:12:02 AM
What fallacy? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:38:53 AM
Real dumb comment? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:37:46 AM
It's real simple... by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:58:33 AM
re: It's real simple... by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:55:21 AM
Not you again... by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:55:03 PM
BFD by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:56:10 PM
"I'll bury" said it, not me... by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:03:27 PM
Thanks, but I know what I said by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:50:23 AM
Flight 77 by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16:52 PM
Your blatant hypocrisy and obfuscation by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:37:46 PM
Albury this doesn't sound like you... by Ron R. on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:20:13 PM
Who's jumping to conclusions? by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:09:32 AM
your problem by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:02:29 AM
What "problem"? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:22:32 AM
Just plane high! by Hal Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:01:24 AM
Global Hawks by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:31:43 AM
Global Hawk wing span by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:07:08 AM
Thanks for sharing by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:28:05 PM
N.O.R.A.D by Nemo on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:35:30 PM
NORAD question by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:42:56 PM
In September Clues... by Bob Smith on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:34:14 AM
From author John Kaminski... by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:45:37 PM
SOS from albury by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:45:49 PM
HAHAHAHA.... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:18:23 PM
KABOOOOOM!!!!! by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:39:26 PM
Hey Len... by Sheila Samples on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:29:45 PM
Calling "I'll bury" Smith by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:47:37 PM
Everybody duck, the feces is flying everywhere by Scott on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:24:41 PM
Duck, everyone. Feces flying everywhere by Scott on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:38:34 PM
the idiocy of people who believe bush about ANYTHING . by Len Hart on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:25:48 AM
B-25 Mitchells by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:15:43 AM
You can't argue with the physics.... by Bob Smith on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:34:36 PM
No, you can't by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:38:52 PM
Energy and matter by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:31:22 AM
Job opportunity by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:46:45 AM
Of Crooks and idiots by Len Hart on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:55:27 AM
Catch the new Discovery channel summary this Sept. 8th? by editnetwork on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:26:56 PM
Would it have made more sense by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:04:06 PM
A FEDERAL GRAND JURY SHOULD INVESTIGATE BUSH by Len Hart on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:45:11 AM
REAL investigation by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:37:20 AM
ad hominems and labels, failure to read by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:29:37 AM
Deja vu by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:30:10 PM
Bush defenders believe in JUNK SCIENCE by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:01:59 AM
SO.... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:36:37 PM
9/11 was an inside job by Robert Moran on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:27:11 AM
Just a hunch by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:33:05 AM
Hunch? by Rafe Pilgrim on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:27:02 AM
Give ME a break by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:23:09 AM
Bush's 'army' of official conspiracy nut jobs... by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:00:52 PM
This has already been explained by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:10:45 PM
knock yourself out but knock off the stupid ad hominem by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:25:28 PM
That's some conspiracy, doofus by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:07:56 PM
Re: Aubrey, the doofus by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:19:47 AM
Once again, for the slow learners by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:13:20 AM
No army - just the scientific method and better theories by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:58:53 PM
physics by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:46:26 AM
That's called begging the question (or just plain lying) by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:20:12 AM
That's called spouting unsubstantiated nonsense by ken on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:55:41 AM
Great news for United Airlines by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:03:53 AM
Albury, the MORON by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:19:23 AM
NTSB by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:11:08 PM
Re: Albury by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:40:59 PM
Let's try this one more time... by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:53:13 PM
Tell'm Albert by Nemo on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:36:33 PM
Who's the chickensh*t who flagged this comment? by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:22:25 PM
Crooks and idiots by Len Hart on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:52:55 AM
Neither by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:53:09 AM
Note to the editor by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:30:53 AM
I think he's really Mr Murphy! by Bia Winter on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:35:23 AM
You apparently don't think by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:58:02 PM
Mr. Smith is Mr. Smith - I am Mr. Murphy by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:32:59 PM
Mr. Murphy by tim bristol on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:00:04 PM
Please cancel that request by tim bristol on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:04:19 PM