Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Don't Regulate. Confiscate.

By       Message Stephen Fournier     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

The Supreme Court said a couple of weeks ago that the Constitution forbids us from legislating a limit on the amount of money people can spend to manipulate public opinion. The First Amendment to the Constitution, which says Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech, gives us all an unlimited right to influence our fellow citizens by buying their attention with paid advertising. Even to the point of denouncing candidates for office on election day, an activity that federal election laws were intended, unconstitutionally, according to five justices, to regulate.

The decision is frustrating to those of us who believe that the political power of vast wealth is destroying our country and our way of life. Still, the case is a close one, and it’s hard not to be sympathetic to principled arguments against limitations on speech, even paid speech.

The problem may not be that people have an unfettered right to influence public opinion with money, but that anybody has enough money to do it. If the Constitution keeps us from telling the rich how much they may spend to influence us, it doesn’t limit our authority to tax wealth, even when our purpose is to limit the political power of those with too much of it. Maybe we should start there, with confiscatory taxes that don't allow for much in the way of bribery, graft, and public relations.

It’s true that confiscatory taxes will cut down on the volume of political advertising we’re exposed to, but the stuff we get at election-time is seldom informative and always narrow and one-sided. To ensure that candidates for office have access to the public, whether or not they can raise money, we should commandeer the air waves for political discussion. The commercial networks and cable broadcasters, all of whom utilize public property to make their money, would have to give up some substantial blocks of time for public use. The Constitution places no limits on Congress’ power to regulate the use of the air waves and public utilities.

We would have to override the objections of the entertainment industry, which now controls broadcasting and reaps obscene profits from our elections. These predators supply the tools of manipulation to our rich proprietors day in and day out. It’s not the Supreme Court or the Constitution, but the corrupt power of the commercial media to influence public opinion that stands between voters and regulation in the public interest. Ironically, they’ve disinformed us so consistently over the past few years that their messages are no longer credible, and this makes them vulnerable.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Hartford, Connecticut, lawyer, grandfather, Air Force veteran. Author/publisher, Current Invective www.currentinvective.com

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Capital Murder in Texas

Fort Hood Mystery

Censored: Media Consolidation Debate

Yoo Disbarment Sought

All In for Rotten AIG

Connecticut Congressman Dodges Impeachment Questions