Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   9 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

One Step Forward, Three Steps Back

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Mary Shaw     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 6
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
On Election Day, tolerance in the USA took a huge step forward with the election of our first African-American president.

On at least three other fronts, however, tolerance took a step backwards in a somewhat different direction. Californians passed Proposition 8, to ban same-sex marriage in that state. Similar marriage bans were approved in Florida and Arizona.

While an African American can now win election to the highest office in the land, gays and lesbians remain second-class citizens, and cannot enjoy all of the benefits that the state has to offer, simply because of whom they happen to be sexually attracted to. It is absurd.

I hear all kinds of excuses: If you allow a man to marry another man, the next thing you know, people will want to marry their pets. Sorry, folks, but that Rick Santorum slippery-slope argument is as ridiculous today as it was when it was used to oppose interracial marriage 45 years ago.

And I hear them say that it's God's word. However, the bible also condones slavery, and forbids working on the Sabbath under punishment of death. I have yet to see the homophobes in recent decades give equal time to these other words of God.

Conservatives point their fingers and denounce the "gay agenda". Yet, the gay agenda is nothing more than a desire for equal treatment under the law. No special rights, just the same rights that we heterosexuals enjoy.

Conservatives claim that same-sex marriage will destroy the institution of marriage. But they don't answer the question of how. Anyone who feels that his own heterosexual marriage would be threatened if gays could marry obviously has some very deep personal issues that cannot be fixed through legislation.

And their fears have already been proven baseless. For example, Massachusetts has permitted same-sex marriages since May of 2004, and that has not led to the end of civilization in that commonwealth as feared by the right-wing homophobes.

I have no doubt that the anti-gay double standards will fade over the coming generations, just as Jim Crow has become a thing of the past, at least on paper.

In the meantime, though, the bigots are hard at work trying to write inequality into their state constitutions.

And these extreme reactions to a nonexistent threat lead me to ponder: What are these people really afraid of?


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

No Excuse for Racial Profiling

No, Dan, America is Not a Christian Nation

Tea Party Talking Points, Translated

Racism Then and Now

They Still Cling to Guns and Religion

The Myth of the Christian Right