"He believes in creating safe, inclusive and welcoming schools that prioritize student well-being and academic success."
-- - Andreas Farmakalidis' website
For the past three elections in LAUSD BD3, I have endorsed and voted for incumbent Scott M. Schmerelson and had anticipated doing so again this year. While he is often too timid a leader for my taste, he was at least usually on the right side of public education issues. His extensive experience as an education professional provided an important voice on the Board, even if the majority was in the pocket of the Charter School Industry and refused to listen.
Going into 2023, I had high hopes for Schmerelson. Dr. Rocio Rivas' victory in the 2022 election had finally given pro-public education Board Members a majority and the chance to bring needed change to the District. Freed from the minority, Schmerelson would have his time to shine.
Unfortunately, my optimism was quickly dashed when at an LAUSD Board meeting on January 17, 2023, Schmerelson supported the notorious North Valley Military Institute (NVMI) charter school and was the lone vote in their favor. While he would later reverse course and write a letter in favor of their charter revocation by the Los Angeles County Office of Education, his original position was very concerning. The history of NVMI was well documented and no Board Member should have been supporting them, especially one who ran on a platform of holding privately operated charter schools accountable for the public funds that they receive.
My concern was further heightened when I received an email from Schmerelson's Chief of Staff taking the position that my proposed "Improving Special Education Within the LAUSD" Board Resolution "runs counter to and does not align with the IDEA, [and] as a result, it is not feasible for the District to pursue." It is hard to understand how a proposal to protect the ability of parents to fully participate in the IEP process could run counter to the law that enshrines the right to a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)for students with Special Education needs.
Schmerelson has since backtracked from this email and promised to look into the possibility of sponsoring a resolution that addresses at least some of the concerns expressed in my proposal. While some preliminary steps have been taken, the lack of progress has been disappointing, considering that I have been pushing the proposed resolution for over 14 months. While I hope that he will eventually follow through as promised, the results at this point are uncertain.
Schmerelson answered questions about PROP-39 Co-Locations, Student Safety, and Governance for the LAUSD Candidate Forum series. Unfortunately, he did not answer the questions about Special Education, which would have given insight into his position on my proposed resolution. He also skipped the questions about the budget.
With the concerns expressed above, I cannot bring myself to vote for Schmerelson in this election. Can any of the other five candidates seamlessly replace the current Board Member?
Dan Chang is "Definitely Not."
While he is running as a change agent, Chang is embracing endorsements from past LAUSD Board Members who have brought dysfunction to the district while pushing for the expansion of charter schools without ensuring that they were properly regulated. Since he did not answer any of the 25 questions in the LAUSD Candidate Forum series, potential voters are left wondering what his positions are for these issues facing the school district that he wants to help lead. His website is also short on specifics.
Perplexingly, Chang has made a point of emphasizing his involvement in the "turnaround" of Locke High School even though the record shows that the Green Dot takeover of this public school was a failure. Furthermore, his bragging about his role in the success of this charter school chain is undermined by the fact that it has closed several of its franchises, disrupting the families whose children attended the schools.
Elizabeth Badger is also "Definitely Not."
A perennial candidate, Badger is making her third attempt for the BD3 seat (in addition to candidacies for State Assembly and City Council). Unfortunately, she has made no visible effort between races to promote change within the LAUSD. During the 2020 race, I noted that her answers to my candidate questionnaire showed a lack of specificity that made it apparent to me that she had not used the previous five years to immerse herself in District issues. This time around she did not even bother to answer any of the questions in the LAUSD Candidate Forum series.
Raquel Villalta is the final "Definitely Not."
As I showed in my endorsement of BD7's Lydia Gutierrez, under the right circumstances I am willing to overlook a difference in political values as long as there is an underlying support for public education. Unfortunately, Villalta is not only a right-wing extremist who supports bigoted groups like the one that violently demonstrated in front of Saticoy Elementary School in June, but she is also supportive of charter schools.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
